Translate

Thursday, December 25, 2014

Scientific Arguments for God's Existence 2

Big Bang arguments

The proof of the failure of the Big Bang theory
1. There are many problems with the Big Bang theory as explanation for the moons, stars, and planets.
2. That such a large structure could form so quickly after the Big Bang calls into question some of the traditional theories of how the universe evolved, Williger said, since it is difficult to explain how gravity could pull together such an immense cluster in a relatively short time . . . . “A successful theory has to explain the extremes,” said Williger. (Discovery News Online, Gerard Williger of NOAO,  01/09/2001)
3. Using the Hubble Space Telescope astronomers detected a new galaxy bright with stars almost as old as the big bang.  In the Science Daily magazine this galaxy, with redshift 7.6, was called the “strong contender for the galaxy distance record.”
    According to theory, stars did not form till the end of the “dark ages” about 400,000 years after the big bang.  Young galaxies emerging from the fog of particles might have had enough energy to evaporate the fog and bring the first stars to light, the article says.  Still, to see a galaxy so soon after the dark ages was unexpected.  An astronomer from UC Santa Cruz said, “We certainly were surprised to find such a bright young galaxy 13 billion years in the past.”  The current age estimate for the whole universe is 13.7 billion years. (Feb. 13, 2008 — The NASA/ESA)
4. In the June 2001 issue of Astronomy Magazine, astrophysicist Mark Sincell lists “The Eight Greatest Mysteries of Cosmology:”
a. How multidimensional is the universe?  (We don’t understand gravity.)
b. How did the universe begin?  (How did an explosion produce such smoothness?)
c. Why does matter fill the universe?  (There should be an equal part of antimatter[1].)
d. How did galaxies form?  (“The details are devilishly difficult to understand.”)
e. What is cold dark matter3?  (What is the other 95% of stuff that must be out there?)
f. Are all the baryons[2] assembled in galaxies?  (Astronomers have only found a tiny fraction of what they expect.)
g. What is the dark energy?  “Physicists have tried to calculate the observed dark-energy density from accepted theories of physics, but their results don’t jibe with reality.  So far, the computed value is roughly 10^60 times greater than the observed value.  (Others say the number could be off by a factor of up to 10^130, but let’s not quibble over the details.)”
h. What is the destiny of the universe?
Some answers are known but mostly cosmologists really don’t know very much at all.
a. For instance, inflation is still the rage, but the author says: “What drove inflation?  Nobody knows.  Physicists have suggested different models to describe the inflating universe, but all the solutions are mathematical conveniences with no particular physical basis.”
b. Regarding dark energy, “The biggest problem with this idea is that no one has any idea what dark energy is.  ‘So far, all we’ve been able to do is name it,’ says [Michael] Turner.  ‘It could be the energy associated with nothing [sic!], or the influence of hidden spatial dimensions.’”
5. The only sound and logical theory of cosmic creation, a cosmos that works perfectly like a huge Swiss watch, is intelligent design. When there is intelligent design there must have been an intelligent designer with an ability of thinking, feeling and willing. That person all men call God. He did it by emanating the atoms, somewhat similar to a Big Bang or Outflow, and controlling these atoms into their specific places in the cosmos.
6. Just as an engineer is rather at home or on holiday then in his office, similarly God transcendent is at home in heaven and God immanent is on duty creating or evolving the cosmic prison house or the material world for us, spirit souls.
7. God exists.

NOTE:
1. Antimatter is material composed of antiparticles, which have the same mass as particles of ordinary matter but have opposite charge.
2. A baryon is a composite subatomic particle made up of three quarks (as distinct from mesons, which comprise one quark and one antiquark).
3. Cold dark matter (or CDM) is a hypothetical form of matter that interacts very weakly with electromagnetic radiation (dark) and most of whose particles move slowly compared to the speed of light (cold). It is believed that approximately 80% of matter in the Universe is dark matter, with only a small fraction being the ordinary "baryonic" matter that composes stars and planets.

The argument of the problems of the Big Bang theory
1 a. In the beginning there was nothing. Then out of nothing appeared matter. “Nothing” in the Big Bang theory does not refer to an absolute nothingness. As seen in the Casimir effect, the so-called empty space is filled to the brim with energy. ”Nothing” means nothing to activate it. Or, “Nothing” means nothing of our material experience.
1b. Problem - The Law of Conservation of Mass-Energy says, matter cannot be created, nor destroyed, only converted from one state to another. But there was no known converter. God has nothing material in Him.
1c. This law is in agreement with the description of the Vedas on the creation of the universe, namely the transformation of more subtle material elements (unknown to gross material instruments, and also ultimately moved by God) to gross elements.
1d. Thus, no transformation of matter can take place without an non-gross-material cause.
2a. Nothing decided to pack itself into a tiny dense dot.
2b. Problem - What was the mechanism that packed nothing into a dense dot? Gravity only works on matter. And gravity came later, after the Bang, into existence. Also, when we talk about nothingness, we can't talk about density, for total volume is opposite of total density.
2c. Solution - let's guess that gravity formed in that first split of a second perfectly, to pull it all together.
2d. Problem - the unanswered question then is: “what caused the gravity? Gravity is an energy or function and its existence implies the existence of its source or controller, the energetic. That energetic also has to be conscious of the purpose for what to use the energy of gravity.
2e. Solution – let’s assume it was a random quantum fluctuation that caused gravity.
3a. Problem – The Big Bang is a prediction from the general theory of relativity but it does not take quantum mechanics into consideration. Modern physics has no quantum gravity theory, which is needed to describe the tiny dense dot.
3b. Solution – let's assume physicists will solve the quantum gravity theory sometime in the future.
4a. The tiny dot exploded.
4b. Problem - there could only be two types of explosions, chemical and nuclear. This explosion could not have been chemical, since there were no chemicals yet. It couldn't have been nuclear either, since there were no atoms yet.
4c. Solution - let's assume the dot was able to explode.
5a. Matter expanded rapidly.
5b. Problem - what mechanism would expand it? If gravity formed perfectly in step 2 to condense vacuum, that same gravity would prevent the dot from expanding.
5c. Solution - let's assume there was some sort of a mechanism to send that matter flying outward.
6a. Intense heat caused by the explosion produced protons, neutrons, and electrons.
6b. Problem - there could be no heat without an energy source.
6c. Solution - let's assume there was some mysterious source of heat.
7a. The explosion followed extremely precise mathematical formulas.
7b. Problem - Explosions follow no formulas, they can only follow chaos. For example, if the universe expanded only 0.1% faster, the present rate of expansion would have been 3000 times greater, and not made our solar system. Had the universe expanded only 0.1% slower, the universe would have only expanded to 3,000,000th of its present radius, and then collapsed.
c. Solution - let's assume somehow it happened rightly.
8. Gas clouds begin to condense to form stars.
9a. The Big Bang only produced hydrogen and helium, other elements were produced from those two.
9b. Problem - there's a "gap at mass 5 and mass 8 problem". There are no stable atoms of mass 5 or mass 8. Neither proton, nor neutron can be attached to a helium nucleus of mass 4. Hydrogen bomb explosions can only produce hydrogen 2, which in turn forms helium 4. Because of that gap at mass 5, the chain reaction cannot continue. The same gap is repeated at mass 8.
9c. Solution - let's assume the other elements did get produced.
10a. First generation stars, composed of hydrogen and helium, explode to produce stars with heavier elements.
10b. Problem - no first generation stars have been found. Plus, even over 15 billion years, there would be not enough time to produce all the stars we have today.  Supernova explosions that should have produced new heavier stars occur only once or twice in a century. There are trillions of stars in the universe, which are second and third generation stars (exploded one or two times). They would need trillions of centuries to form. Couldn't they have exploded at a faster rate before? Not according to what we observe. Stars at the outer edges of the universe are, theoretically, snapshots of the beginning of time, and yet, we don't see more explosions when looking at the outer edges of the universe.
10c. Solution - let's assume heavier stars did form somehow.
11a. Intricate structures of solar systems, galaxies, clusters, and super-clusters, are formed.
11b. Problem - How could all the forces in the universe get fine-tuned by themselves to create a universe that works like clock-work?
11c. Solution - let's imagine this still happened.
12. The Big Bang theory is not a bonafide scientific theory. The universe is intelligently designed.
14. God, the Big Mind and Intelligence behind the creation of the universe, is the only plausible explanation.
15. God exists.

The arguments of Big Bang theory
A:
1. By the early 1980s these problems threatened the foundations of modern cosmology.
2a. The horizon problem stated that it was highly improbable to get a uniform universe during an expansion when different sectors had no way to be in thermal equilibrium.
2b. The inflation theory rescued the big bang: it smoothed out those temperature differences by expanding them to astronomical scales.
3a. The flatness problem stated that it was highly improbable to get a universe finely balanced (flat) between the extremes of positive and negative curvature.
3b. The inflation theory diluted any initial curvature by spreading it out to hyper-astronomical dimensions, so that our local region (the “observable universe”) appears flat, like a bacterium on a large beach ball might think it is living on a flat surface.
4a. The lumpiness problem stated that it is highly improbable to expect an explosion of a sea of particles to condense into stars and galaxies.
4b. However, the inflation theory generated matter out of vacuum energy that leftover temperature fluctuations in the “comic microwave background” were able to condense into lumps – the seeds of the first galaxies.
5. To accept the inflation theory to these problems one has to believe that something can come from nothing, and that the something would undergo a one-time, somehow expansion from the size a tennis ball to the size of the whole universe, 26 orders of magnitude, in about a trillion trillionth of a second.
6. God created the universe. That uncreated mover all men call God.
7. God exists.
B:
1. The Alternative Cosmology Group (ACG) was initiated with the Open Letter on Cosmology written to the scientific community and published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004. The text of the letter is as follows:
2. "The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed -- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
3. But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors. Without the hypothetical inflation field, the big bang does not predict the smooth, isotropic cosmic background radiation that is observed, because there would be no way for parts of the universe that are now more than a few degrees away in the sky to come to the same temperature and thus emit the same amount of microwave radiation.
4. Without some kind of dark matter, unlike any that we have observed on Earth despite 20 years of experiments, big-bang theory makes contradictory predictions for the density of matter in the universe. Inflation requires a density 20 times larger than that implied by big bang nucleosynthesis, the theory's explanation of the origin of the light elements. And without dark energy, the theory predicts that the universe is only about 8 billion years old, which is billions of years younger than the age of many stars in our galaxy.
5. What is more, the big bang theory can boast of no quantitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation. The successes claimed by the theory's supporters consist of its ability to retrospectively fit observations with a steadily increasing array of adjustable parameters, just as the old Earth-centered cosmology of Ptolemy needed layer upon layer of epicycles.
5a. God Immanent did all the magic; adjusting, energizing and engineering while emanating all the multiverses out of His pores.
5b. God Transcendent is in heaven, regularly creating the material world, to function as a prison house for those who, like Adam and Eve, were and will become disobedient to God.
6. God exists, heaven exists.

The argument of the Flatness Problem
1. The expansion rate of the universe appears to be very finely balanced with the force of gravity; this condition is known as flat.
2. If the universe were the accidental by-product of a big bang, it is difficult to imagine how such a fantastic coincidence could occur. Big-bang cosmology cannot explain why the matter density in the universe isn’t greater, causing it to collapse upon itself (closed universe), or less, causing the universe to rapidly fly apart (open universe).
3. Since any deviation from perfect flatness tends to increase as time moves forward, it logically follows that the universe must have been even more precisely balanced in the past than it is today. Thus, at the moment of the big bang, the universe would have been virtually flat to an extremely high precision. This must have been the case (assuming the big bang), despite the fact that the laws of physics allow for an infinite range of values. This is a coincidence that stretches credulity to the breaking point.
4. Balance however testifies for one who created a balance to fine-tune the universe for life. Such a great task could have been done only by God.
5. God exists.

The argument of the “lumpiness problem”
1. Astronomers have found a mind-bogglingly large structure — so big it takes light 10 billion years to traverse — in a distant part of the universe.
The discovery poses a conundrum to a fundamental tenet of modern cosmology, which posits that matter should appear to be distributed uniformly if viewed at a large enough scale.[1]
NOTE: After accounting for potential survey biases -- such as NASA's Swift telescope and other gamma ray trackers looking more often in one part of the sky or another -- scientists found a region roughly 10 billion light-years away in the direction of the constellations Hercules and Corona Borealis that had a disproportionate number of gamma ray bursts.
2. The newly found structure is more than double the size of the previous record-holder, a cluster of 73 quasars referred to as the Huge-LQG, or Large Quasar Group, which spans 4 billion light-years. It is six times larger than the 1.4-billion-light year diameter Sloan Great Wall.
NOTE: Light travels at about 671 million miles per hour, or about 6 trillion miles per year.
3. This is the “lumpiness problem” of big bang cosmology: how do you get lumpy objects from a smooth beginning?  It was hard enough to explain relatively small lumps, like galaxies, or clusters of galaxies.  Now, such an immense structure compounds the lumpiness problem by many orders of magnitude.  The new structure is inferred from the distribution of gamma ray bursts.
4. Istvan Horvath of the National University of Public Service in Budapest, Hungary says: “For now I have ‘no idea’ how something that big could have evolved.”
5. Whether it evolved quickly or slowly the forces or energies for developing something that big must have been designed or created by the greatest brain that has thinking, feeling and willing. This is the description of God’s activity.
6. God exists.

Reference:
1. News: space.com/23754-universe-largest-structure-cosmic-conundrum.html

The argument of the “flatness problem”
1. There are a couple of problems with the standard Big Bang model. The first is called the flatness problem---why is the universe density so nearly at the critical density or put another way, why is the universe so flat? Currently, the universe is so well-balanced between the positively-curved closed universe and the negatively-curved open universe that astronomers have a hard time figuring out which model to choose. Of all the possibilities from very positively-curved (very high density) to very negatively-curved (very low density), the current nearly flat condition is definitely a special case. The balance would need to have been even finer nearer the time of the Big Bang because any deviation from perfect balance gets magnified over time. For example, if the universe density was slightly greater than the critical density a billion years after the Big Bang, the universe would have re-collapsed by now.
2. Consider the analogy of the difficulty of shooting an arrow at a small target from a distance away. If your angle of shooting is a little off, the arrow misses the target. The permitted range of deviation from the true direction gets narrower and narrower as you move farther and farther away from the target. The earlier in time the universe's curvature became fixed, the more finely tuned the density must have been to make the universe's current density be so near the critical density. If the curvature of the universe was just a few percent off from perfect flatness within a few seconds after the Big Bang, the universe would have either re-collapsed before fusion ever began or the universe would expanded so much that it would seem to be devoid of matter. It appears that the density/curvature was very finely tuned.
3. Perfect balance and fine tuning always happens under control and control is an ability of a person.
4. Only God could balance and fine tune the creation and maintenance of such a big body like the universe.
5. God exists.

The argument of the inflation theory
1. Alan Guth invented the inflationary big bang to explain away the flatness and horizon problems, which indeed suggest the universe is a "put up job."
2. In 1981 he claimed that the universe doubled in size a hundred times in a trillionth of a second, going from the size of a marble to “outta sight” in less than the blink of an eye namely at around 1000 times the speed of light in a process called inflation.
3. In fact Andrei Linde speculated Guth understated the inflation speed by a factor of 10^1,000,000.
4. Overbye has reported that, Guth and another MIT professor, Ed Fahri, found that, “If you could compress 25 pounds of matter into 10^-24 centimeters, making a mass 10^75 times the density of water…a bubble of false vacuum, or what Guth called a ‘child universe’ would be formed. From outside it would look like a black hole. From the inside it would look like an inflating universe.” (page 229, Bye Bye Big Bang, Hello Reality by William C. Mitchell)
5. The original theory of the 80s agrees well with observations. However, the theory has been developed over time to take into account quantum effects and this more advanced version of the theory predicts that one is more likely to end up in regions of space which do not look like ours. So rather than explaining flat space and so on, it transpires that the theory predicts pretty much any kind of outcome and so doesn't explain the appearance of our region of space at all - unless it is argued that we happen to live in a region that inflated by just the right amount to give rise to flat space etc, but then you could argue that without inflation!
6. Now it is well known that highly improbable conditions are required to start inflation. Worse, inflation goes on eternally, producing infinitely many outcomes, so the theory makes no firm observational predictions.
7. Thus, some of the inflation theory’s creators including the author, are having second thoughts. As the original theory has developed, cracks have appeared in its logical foundations.
8. Even these few things are enough to see that the best explanation for the fine tuning and balance in the universe is intelligent design by the greatest designer all men call God.
9. God exists.

The argument of the instant galaxies
1. The z8_GND_5296 farthest and oldest galaxy yet (700 million years after the Big Bang in the material cosmological view, or redshift 7.51) was already fully mature, creating stars hundreds of times faster than the Milky Way does and is “richer in heavy elements” than expected – requiring multiple generations of stars to have formed, aged, and exploded.  This “exceptional” galaxy so near the beginning requires cosmologists to invent special conditions that are not acting or known today.
2. The BBC News echoed the discovery: “there are already quite surprisingly evolved galaxies in the very early Universe.”
3. Fully evolved galaxies in the very early universe exist because of creating powers which can belong only to a person who knows what laws are needed to create and maintain the complex clock like structures of galaxies. Such a great task can be done only by God.
4. God exists.

References:
1. Nature magazine: Light from farthest galaxy yet discovered breaks through cosmic fog, 23 October 2013
2. http://news.sciencemag.org, ScienceShot: The Universe's Farthest Galaxy … So Far, 23 October 2013

The argument of the early maturity of galaxies
1. A new Hubble survey “found that the assorted range of galaxy types seen today were also present about 11 billion years ago, meaning that the types of galaxies seen today, which astronomers described as a ‘cosmic zoo,’ have been around for at least 80 percent of the universe’s lifespan.”  The survey pushes back the early maturity of galaxies from 8 billion years to 11.5 billion.
“This is the only comprehensive study to date of the visual appearance of the large, massive galaxies that existed so far back in time,” co-author Arjen van der Wel of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany said in a statement. “The galaxies look remarkably mature, which is not predicted by galaxy formation models to be the case that early on in the history of the universe.” (September 13, 2013)
2. The sudden appearance of various groups of galaxies already in mature states is like the Cambrian explosion in the fossil record (The Cambrian period began 570 million years ago and the Cambrian Explosion occurred about 540 million years ago over 2-3 million years or less. At the time of the Cambrian Explosion, nearly every animal phyla (=the major taxonomic group of animals and plants) on Earth (more than 70) suddenly appeared).
3. This discovery falsifies the materialistic scientist’s cosmic evolution theory and proves intelligent design by a great designer who can create the complex structures of galaxies in an instant. This great designer can be only God.
4. God exists.

The argument that the universe is not eternal
(from a discussion between William Lane Craig and cosmologist Sean Carroll on the beginning of the universe and the Kalam Cosmological Argument)
1. Carroll pointed out that the Borde Guth Vilenkin (or BVG) theorem that the universe had a beginning only works within relativity but does not take quantum effects into account. Given a lack of a complete theory of quantum gravity, he argued that Craig can not claim that the universe began to exist.
2. This is partly true. One thing known for certain about quantum gravity is something called the holographic principle. Precisely put, the holographic principle tells us that the entropy of a region of space (measured in terms of information) is directly proportional to a quarter or any amount (1/2 complete) of its surface area or any related measurement (radius, diameter). The volume of this region is then actually a hologram of this information on its surface.
3. Another thing that it tells us is that the entropy, or the amount of disorder present, always increases with time. In fact, not only is this law inviolate, it is also how the flow of time is defined. Without entropy or disorder, destruction i.o.w change, there is no way to discern forwards and backwards in time.
4. However, if the holographic principle links the universe’s entropy and its horizon area then going back in time, all of space-time eventually vanishes to nothing at zero entropy, at the beginning of the creation. Thus Carroll’s argument is unsound.
5. The universe is not eternal but created.
6. By the way this also undermines claims made by atheists like Hawking and Krauss that the universe could have fluctuated into existence from nothing. Their argument rests on the assumption that there was a pre-existent zero-point field or ZPF. The only trouble is that the physics of a ZPF requires a space-time to exist in. No space-time means no zero-point field, and without a zero-point field, the universe can not spontaneously fluctuate into existence.
7. One other point of Carroll’s was his view that regardless of the physics discovered, the sort of supernatural explanation Craig gave could no longer be considered valid. Carroll, being a physicist, naturally believes that whatever the final answer is it will come in physical terms. After all it is not every day that scientists speak of God or supernatural agents. Instead they expect explanations to come in material terms with equations.
8. But Carroll may be ruling something out too quickly. A holographic universe entails a world made of information. And information requires a mind to know it. Information never just floats, information is of a mind, who knows it.
9. “All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force…We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is a matrix of all matter.” – Max Planck
10. God exists.

The argument of parallels of Vedic wisdom and the ideas of Nassim Haramein
(INTRO: Kilauea, Hawaii (May 7, 2013) - A groundbreaking paper published last week sheds new light on the theory of gravity and the potential to significantly impact global issues facing the human race, including alternative energy sources.)
1. Nassim Haramein, Director of Research at the Hawaii Institute for Unified Physics (HIUP), has authored a paper titled “Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass,” which has been validated and published in the peer review journal, Physical Review and Research International. This paper discusses Haramein’s “Connected Universe” theory, which offers a new and alternative understanding of gravity through basic algebraic and geometric equations.
1a. Algebraic and geometric equations perfectly proof intelligent design.
2. Haramein’s work indicates everything in the universe is connected, from the largest to the smallest scale, through a unified understanding of gravity. He demonstrates that it is the space that defines matter and not matter that defines space.
2a. The Vedic understanding is similar to Haramein’s; everything in the universe is connected but the Vedas also say how; through Brahman, all pervading spiritual energy or atoms and the Supersoul, God immanent or Paramatma, who is within and without every atom. The Paramatma controls the spiritual and material atoms, and manifests or withdraws the qualities or energy or waves of these atoms, as one can dim or increase light. Both Brahman and Paramatma are emanations and features of God, Bhagavan or Krishna, who is in param-nirvana, transcendence, heaven, beyond matter.
3. Haramein claims that “matter is made up of 99.9 percent space.”
3a. At the time of creation, according to the Vedic descriptions, all is space. From 10% of space, by the control of the Paramatma, air, prana or vayu is created. This air is the atoms of space or ether, but without the sabda, vibration quality of ether. The element air means all the gaseous or airy elements.
From 10% of the airy elements, the element fire is created. They can explode, give of light or burn. From 10% of the fiery elements and due to the presence of Paramatma, water is created. This water includes all the liquid elements we find in nature. From 10% of the watery elements, earth is created. Earth means all the solid types of the elements. Thus we can see that of all the elements in the universe the element of space is the greatest. And all other elements are a transformation of space or ether atoms. And space is all pervading throughout all the elements as the fifth dimension. Dimension 1 to 4 being the solid, fluid, luminous, gaseous. Haramein says matter is made up of 99.9 percent space. The Vedas say 90% ether, and the other 10 % is also ether but as a transformation of ether.
All the transformations of energies are according to the laws of thermodynamics. The material atoms are put into motion or transforming by the powers of the Paramatma.
4. Nassim continues: “Quantum field theory states that the structure of space-time itself, at the extremely small level, vibrates with tremendous intensity. If we were to extract even a small percentage of all the energy held within the vibrations present in the space inside your little finger, it would represent enough energy to supply the world’s needs for hundreds of years. This new discovery has the potential to open up access and harness that energy like never before, which would revolutionize life as we know it today.”
4. Dr. Albert Einstein postulated way back in 1917 the existence of energy in empty space. He said that the energy in space counterbalanced the effect of gravity and provided stability to the universe from collapsing on itself due to gravitational pull. He called it ‘Cosmological Constant.’  However, he withdrew later his postulation as a mistake when Astronomers found that the universe was not actually stable but was expanding. When Dr. A. Resiss and others found in 1998 that the universe was not only expanding, but expanding with an increasing pace, astronomers then revived the concept of Cosmological Constant with doubled conviction invoking it as the cause for accelerated expansion of the universe.  Further, satellite studies in 2006 established that about 73 percent of the universe consisted of some invisible energy. (This figure now stands revised to 68.3 percent based on the Planck satellite data released in 2013).  A comprehensive study in 2007 by Dr. Jesper Sollerman and Dr. Tamara Davis of Copenhagen University convincingly established that Einstein’s Cosmological Constant is this invisible energy.  Quantum Physics provides the raison d’etre for the existence of energy in empty space.
5. At the basis of Haramein’s research is a bold prediction about the charge radius of the proton, which was recently verified by experiment. Less than a month after Haramein sent his paper to the Library of Congress, the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland released a new measurement for the size of the proton, confirming Haramein’s prediction.
6. “Protons are the primary building blocks of our universe – they are at the center of every atom and therefore are everywhere and in everything,” said Chris Almida, Executive Director of the Resonance Project Foundation, parent organization of HIUP. “It is critical that we accurately understand proton structure if we are to even begin to understand the ‘connected universe.’ Nassim's prediction was confirmed and is exactly right (within the margin of error of the experiment), whereas the Standard Model theory is off by a significant amount.”
6a. The Vedic wisdom states on this that the material energy is composed of the smallest particles called paramanus. This is the atom; atoms cannot be cut further. The paramanus are components of the six kinds of quarks (elementary subatomic particles), the six types of anti-quarks and the leptons (the electron, positron and neutron). These are the smallest particles known in the western science. Each of these particles is a little smaller then 10^-18cm. The size of the atom of the western materialistic science is 1 angstrom (10^-10cm).
6b. The paramanu according to the Nyaya-Vaisesika is 0.79x10^-22. This is its usual size, one sometimes find other figures because this paramanu, being a living entity is elastic: it can shrink or expand.  The radiations waves or energies, the modes or the gunas of the paramanus all differ. They mix to give varieties of quarks (elementary subatomic particles) and leptons. If these assemble then we get for example, mesons an elementary particle having a mass between that of an electron and proton (these particles were originally named mesotrons by Heisenberg), protons, antiprotons, hadrons, baryons, neutrons. Atoms and molecules are composed of these particles. The further combination of these particles will give the elements or the objects of unlimited varieties of qualities of our world. The qualities, modes or guna’s means in relation to rupa, sparsa, sabda, rasa and gandha (form, touch, sound, taste and smell). The paramanus are the building blocks of the universe and the gunas are like the concrete that bind the paramanus.
6c. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics describes basic principles of everyday life, namely the universal law of decay; the ultimate cause of why everything ultimately falls apart and disintegrates over time. The atom however does not fall apart, because it is the smallest particle. The combination of atoms combine or disintegrate. The Vedas describe that it is the Paramatma or parama-atom, which we could also call the God-particle, who energizes the qualities or structures of the atoms, to keep particles together or fall apart, which we measure as time. The Paramatma causes time.
7a. All in all, it is not surprising that there are similarities between the Vedic wisdom and the discoveries of Nassim Haramein since he took inspiration from Vedic and Buddhistic texts for the ideas of his theory.
7b. The maintenance of these tremendous energies in the universe have an inexhaustible source and director of that energy or an energetic, all men call the inexhaustible, great God. Just as various electrical devices have various users of the energy, and a powerhouse and engineers at the beginning.
9. God exists.

The proof of the cosmological tale
1. In the August 2001 Sky and Telescope journal the editor Rick Fienberg in his editorial opening tries to explain the seemingly contradictory and illogical statements from modern cosmology.  He imagines a conversation with a non-astronomer:
“The universe began with the Big Bang.”
“Where did it happen?”
“'It didn’t happen anywhere; it happened everywhere. Now the universe is expanding.”
“Into what?”
“Not into anything; space itself – space-time, actually – is expanding and carrying the galaxies with it.  Astronomers used to think the expansion was slowing down as galaxies tugged on each other with gravity. Now they think the expansion is speeding up.”
“Really?  What’s pushing it?”
“Something scientists call the ‘cosmological constant’ or ’vacuum energy.’ Most people just call it ‘dark energy.’”
“Oh, so it comes from dark matter?”
“No, that‘s different. Dark matter, like ordinary matter, pulls on stuff with its gravity. Dark energy pushes on stuff.”
“So the universe has been expanding faster and faster since the Big Bang, pushed by dark energy?”
“Not exactly. In the first fraction of a second after the Big Bang, the universe inflated like a balloon, but over the next few billion years the expansion slowed.”
“But you just said it’s speeding up.”
“It is now, but it wasn’t in the distant past, except during the early burst of inflation. It took a while for the outward push of dark matter to overcome the inward pull of dark matter and begin to accelerate the expansion.”
“Oh. Well, what exactly is the dark energy?”
“Nobody knows. Some astronomers think it has something to do with quantum physics or higher dimensions.”
“Hmm. How about the dark matter – what’s that made of?”
“Nobody knows that either. Some of it may be made up of black holes1, small planets, or dead stars too faint to see in telescopes. But most of it is probably made up of subatomic particles that haven’t been discovered yet.”
“The whole thing sounds made up to me.”
2. After this impasse, Fienberg comments:
“Of course, it’s not all made up – it’s backed up by abundant data, much of it very recent and very compelling. Nevertheless, modern cosmology is so counterintuitive that it sounds like nonsense. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that more people say they believe in a religious story of creation than in the story told by cosmologists.”
3. We have discussed these ‘abundant data’; they are not ‘compelling’ at all. The only sound and logical theory of cosmic creation, a creation or cosmic order that works perfectly like a Swiss watch, is intelligent design. When there is intelligent design there must have been an intelligent designer with an ability of thinking, feeling and willing. That person all men call God.
4. God exists.

NOTE:
1. The hole is called "black" because it absorbs all the light that hits the horizon, reflecting nothing. A black hole is a region of spacetime from which gravity prevents anything, including light, from escaping. Black holes of stellar mass are expected to form when very massive stars collapse at the end of their life cycle. After a black hole has formed it can continue to grow by absorbing mass from its surroundings. By absorbing other stars and merging with other black holes, supermassive black holes of millions of solar masses may form. There is general consensus that supermassive black holes exist in the centers of most galaxies.

The argument of the complexity of the Big Bang event
1. Before the Big Bang and very early in the expansion of the Big Bang's beginning, the physical, chemistry and gravitational laws guiding them were very clearly in play - precisely and comprehensively. Otherwise an ordinary bang or explosion always causes chaos. The question is where did they come from?
2. These laws guiding the universe can’t have created themselves.
3. Newtonian or classical physics, and all sciences derived from physics, rest squarely on the principle of locality, the idea that correlated events are related by a chain of causation. And so everything has a cause and no law invented itself.
4. The laws and the mechanisms of the Big Bang had to work comprehensively and in perfect timing and synchronization, otherwise we would not have the universe that eventually developed, or subsequently, an earth habitable for life.
5. Within 10 to the -37 seconds of the Big Bang's beginning expansion, there was a phase transition that caused exponential cosmic inflation or expansion.
6. Afterward, simple atomic nuclei formed within 3 minutes of the Big Bang's beginning.
7. All the necessary primary elements were produced; hydrogen with just the right amounts of helium and lithium, etc. All the critical primary elements came together via the laws of gravity. The question here again is from where and how this law of gravity popped up.
8. The Big Bang had to have just the right extreme temperatures, just the right size, rate and speed of expansion, just the right rate of cooling. Within 10 to the -6 seconds of the Big Bang beginning, protons and neutrons developed, etc.
9. All this is evidence of great precision amongst the required interactive mechanisms, processes, physics, chemistry, laws of motion, energy, etc. The many scientific laws that precisely guided/framed/controlled the many staggeringly complex processes, were already there at the very beginning.
10. If key components had occurred differently immediately even within minutes upon the expansion away from the Singularity the universe that resulted would have been impossible.
11. Thus the complexity of the Big Bang is evidence of a highly controlled event that could have been done only by God.
12. God exists.

The argument that Big Bang means Big Brain
1. How all of a sudden there can be an explosion, by chance? Before an explosion takes place, there must be some arrangement. The bomb is prepared by somebody. The bomb is kept by somebody. The bomb is brought and put by somebody. After some time it explodes, activated by somebody. But brainless people give noble prize to rascals speaking: “By chance suddenly there was an explosion.”
2. Explosion was there because God was there. There was somebody, some brain, and that brain is God’s. Explosion is the proof of the existence of God.
Because we can accept something that is going on – what is proven. Can you show us an explosion suddenly by chance?
Because you say “there was explosion” that means there is God.
3. Then where did God come from? That is God. God is eternal, always existing. Just like I am, you are, also eternally existing. We are changing body. We are not the body. We are spiritual atom. Matter or the smallest subatomic particles are also eternal. They also have no “coming from.”
4a. We have never seen a pile or group of particles independently acting or getting into motion.
  b. But persons moving things, balls, particles etc. that we can prove. We see this always within our experience.
5a. The particles in nature are moved, clustered, ordered, kneaded into planets, evolved or grown into plants, animals, humans etc. by super-humans called gods.
5b. Is there one all-pervading God, many gods in a hierarchy or are all equal?
The universes have as their reflection the human states or kingdoms, because this finite material world is the prison house part since the material body is the prison cell of the spirit soul.
Thus there is a hierarchy of gods and on the top is the best God. The best means the Supreme in opulences such as intelligence (The Big Brain behind the Big Bang), wealth, power, good personal qualities, beauty, wisdom, love.
6. God exists.

The argument of the universe as a big juggling exhibition
1 . The universe means the total or the whole of the 10^23 planets, stars, moons etc. , according to western science or cosmology, the result of the Big Bang. Beyond this there is maybe some more universes and unlimited darkness, space. According to the Vedic science of the East, beyond these 10^23 circling balls there are 8 round walls so the whole universe looks like a huge ball. The first wall is 10 times thicker than the diameter of the space within. The second wall is 10 times thicker than the first wall. The third wall is 10 times thicker than the 2nd etc. And there are even more than 10^23 planets because there are many subtle, invisible planets.
2. All the 10^23 flying balls are circling. This is put up and kept up by a Supreme Juggler as in our experience only a juggler has balls systematically circling in the air.
3. Thus God immanent exists. But He is also transcendental to all this turmoil and turning. Who likes to live in such a hubble-bubble?
Just as a juggler does his art or work in a circus or theater but his real life of pleasure and love is at home.
Nor does God like to live within this closed small, finite ball-like universe. He likes the freedom in the infinity of the spiritual paradise.
4. God immanent is an expansion of God transcendent. This God in the universe is duty-bound to Generate, Operate and Destroy (G-O-D) the prison-house of matter for the rebel of/in paradise/heaven.
5. God exists. Heaven exists.

The argument of the Big Bang ‘explosion’
1. Most people think of the big bang as an explosion in space; however scientists use the term to describe the beginning of space, time, matter and energy.
2. Four characteristics—a singular beginning, cosmic expansion, and constant laws of physics including the law of decay—define a big bang universe.
3. The similarity between the Vedic description of the universe, written thousands of years ago, and the current scientific understanding of the universe is evidence for supernatural inspiration of the words of the Vedas.
4. That supernatural inspiration about the detailed knowledge of the universe could have come only from God.
5. God exists.

The argument of the Big Bang
1. The big bang is NOT a big “bang” as generally people understand the expression. This phrase reminds them of images of bomb blasts or exploding dynamite that yield disorder and destruction.
In  World  War  II,  there  were  many  big  bangs,  but  nothing positive  came  out  of  them.  They were all destructive.
The atomic explosions over Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn’t create a television, radio or computer.
Then  why  should  we  think that a  big  bang  created this  precisely  designed  and marvelously  varied  universe?
2. In truth, this “bang” represents an immensely powerful yet carefully planned and controlled release of matter, energy, space, and time within the strict confines of very carefully fine-tuned physical constants and laws which govern their behavior and interactions.
3. The power and care this explosion reveals exceeds human potential for design by multiple orders of magnitude.
4. The power to move dead matter and by that to create a well designed order so great like our universe can come only from God.
5. God exists.

The proof that the ultimate cause is in heaven; there is no need of a cause of heaven because it is all or most perfect
1. God must be the cause of the Big Bang. He is the Big Brain behind the Big Bang because explosions always have a personal cause.
And the cosmic order proves that the explosion and the materials or atoms are, after exploding, guided into all the forms of nature: planets, flora and fauna.
2. God doesn’t live here, ultimately. He expanded a form to do the material world; after all who likes to be eternally exploding or emanating and imploding matter. And pleasing and punishing the fallen foolish living entities, who are chasing after the shadows or inferior matter.
He delegated a director and creator of the prison house of the material world.
3. Thus God resides in heaven
a. There is no need of a cause behind heaven and God. That world is all perfect.
Just as deluded living entities don’t bother about or need another world; matter is ok for them, as the worm living in excrement.
b. Or just as the kingdom of Rama (-raja) is the ultimate and beyond the prison of the kingdom, so heaven is the ultimate and beyond the cosmic prison-house. Thus heaven is the ultimate perfection and has no cause or something higher.
4. God or the Ultimate and Supreme Personality of Godhead, along with Heaven, exists.

The proof that a tiny airplane is flying in the sky and it is making so much sound but millions and trillions of planets are floating and there is no sound
1. The earth has two movements. It is rotating and also going around the sun but we cannot feel any movement or hear any sound.
The speed of the earth rotating on its axis is 1,675 km/hour or 465 meters/second.
The earth’s speed around the sun is about 30 km/s (108,000 km/h), which is fast enough to cover the planet's diameter (about 12,700 km) in seven minutes, and the distance to the Moon of 384,000 km in four hours.
The earth has a layer of atmosphere. The space through which the planets move is not with the friction as in the earth’s atmosphere.
2. To get the airplane flying one needs a creator of the engine, the vehicle etc. One needs a pilot, a maintenance crew. For the more perfect earth planet, for example, one also needs engineers, creators etc. and a pilot.
So many arrangements are necessary to fly 500 passengers in a Boeing 747; for food, drinking, sitting, sleeping, music, television, wifi (computer network), doctors (first aid), toilet etc.
3. The earth has 7 billion human passengers;
    approximately 30 million animal species that equals many trillions of animal passengers;
    Around 400,000 plant species that equals many trillions of plant passengers.
There must be a grand maintenance company behind this huge flying city, country or ball.
4. Airplanes fly for pleasure but they crash. And, the flying and the destiny of the plane is suffering or something mediocre. Planets never crash. Life in this prison house of matter is suffering, ignorant and temporary.
5. God’s expansion, the creator, creates and controls matter.
    God, the controller and enjoyer of the spiritual energy is in the spiritual world as the prison director is in the jail and the president or king in their palace.
6. God, who is in His many forms, but who is One, exists.

The Argument of the Supreme Architect
1. The universe consists of 10^80 atoms building blocks- atoms.
Everything is in a constant coming and going; we see creation maintenance and destruction of the flora fauna humans and planets. This is all done by a group of Supreme engineers, architects, masonries and builders or contractors.
2. This world is imperfect, faulty and deficient. There is disease, old age and death. There are the calamities of nature. There is interpersonal cold and hot wars. On the whole there is more suffering then pleasure. The creation is a masterpiece of art but not paradise.
3. An architect, engineer, contractor or builder makes his own house the best.
Similarly, the supreme architect, engineer, builder- God- lives in a paradise or heaven.
4. God and His original abode in the spiritual world or heaven exist.

The argument of the mind of all matter in the universe
1. “The ultimate cause of atheism, Newton asserted, is ‘the notion of bodies having, as it were, a complete, absolute and independent reality in themselves.’”
2. The 1925 discovery of quantum mechanics solved the problem of the Universe’s nature. Bright physicists were again led to believe what is for atheists the unbelievable — that the Universe is mental.
3. According to Sir James Jeans an astronomer, mathematician and physicists of Princeton University: “the stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter…we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.”
4. Matter cannot produce mind but rather a thoughtful mind can produce structures of matter. If we leave all the molecules or atoms of the brain on a pile under Mother Nature’s sky no brain or mind will ever be produced by thunderbolts, high pressures or typhoons. But a person with a mind can create e.g. a computer.
5. This means mind pre-existed to matter.
6. A mind is a property of a person and the mind of the universe can only be God’s.
7. God exists.

The argument of the miniature universe
1. If some man creator would make a miniature cosmos, with all the 10^23 planets, rotating stars and star clusters, moons and planets circling, with the clouds and winds moving, the flora and fauna, that human creator would be glorified for making this huge, fine piece of art.
2. Such a miniature cosmos would never ever arise spontaneously, by chance or evolution from a pile of atoms. No chance. The chance would be 0.000 x 10^infinite.
3. God, the creator of the material world exists.

The argument of unbelievable history
1. The chunk or singularity or totality of material atoms in chaos had a Big Bang. By this the basic, and only existing at that time, particles of matter created first gas, then clouds of matter, then planets. Then 8.400.000 forms of life.
2. Suppose you have to make a movie of this theory. Each step of this scenario needs a huge movie company with several engineers, industrial designers, architects, building companies etc. etc. etc. and the head man (producer).
3. Similarly, God and gods emanate and evolve the planetary systems.
4. God exists.

The argument of the smooth “big bang” and “big crunch” model
1a. Science finds that the “big bang”, the cause of the creation of the universe, was a gradual evolution. This is established by measuring the background radiation in the universe.
1b. Science in great detail registers the effect of this “Big Bang”. They describe that the universe has design, and esthetic and powerful energies. By seeing what the Big Bang brought forth, we see the Creator is God, the Supreme Person.
Person according to the dictionary means someone thinking, feeling and willing.
Design means thinking.
Esthetics, beauty means feeling.
Energy means will power.
1c. There is a creator and controller of the universe. The cause of the universe must have had the properties of God. By qualifying the indescribable Bang to have all these potencies science conforms to the Vedic definition of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
1d. God exists.
2a. Where is He, who is He?
This is the world of laws. Kala (time), karma (activity), klesa (miseries firm the body and mind, demigods or material nature and other living entities) and guna (the ropes of maya goodness, passion and ignorance).
The lawgiver or king lives beyond the world of laws in a palace or paradise.
And a king (as in Ramaraja or Dwarakaraja) is wise, blissful with all opulence (rich, powerful, beauty), all good qualities (such as saintliness).
2b. So God is in heaven and is full of all opulence.
3a. How the creation took place
The evolution or emanation smooth big bang within the shells of the universe took place according to Vedas from Brahma, the creator of the planets, stars and moons, with all their residents.
There is also an expansion, processed from Garbhodakasayi Visnu.
He is also within the shells of the universe. From His navel bursts out or grows a lotus flower on which Lord Brahma sits. Brahma and the creation ingredients come forth from this Visnu, through the stem of this lotus flower.
4. Another evolutionary “Big Bang” is from MahaVisnu. He emanates the 35 million universes, from the pores of His body. From each pore comes one universe. From Him expands the above Garbhodakasayi Visnus (also 35 million).
5a. MahaVisnu expands, bangs or flows forth from MahaSankarsana, who is an eternal extension of Balarama in Dvaraka, who is an eternal expansion from Balarama in Vrindavana, the ultimate abode of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krishna. Balarama is from the original Krishna, the Supreme and first of the Personalities of Godhead. These personalities can be compared with the prison-director, the minister of justice, the King in His office (Maha-Visnu), the King in His palace (Maha-Sankarsana), and the King and his brother in His holiday resort (Krishna and Balarama).
5b. Krishna, God, exists.

The argument by sun and maintenance
1. Steadily giving out light the sun will continue to do so for about 150 trillion years, according to the Vedas.
2. The sun is already shining for 150 trillion years.
3. Therefore, the question is what causes the sun to steadily giving light.
4. As behind shining electric bulbs is the creator of the bulb, and the engineer and director of the electricity powerhouse, so behind this design, creation and maintenance of the sun is God.
5. God exists.

The argument of the supervision of order
1. We find in nature many laws like the law of gravitation, the laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics.
2. Just as in any state, the government or the king makes different laws and supervises their subjects that the laws are carried out, so the laws of nature had to be generated and supervised by some intelligent being.
3. So, for everything that happens according to those laws there has to be a supervisor or controller.
4. Man can create small laws and control limited things in his domain, but nature’s grand laws had to be created by a big brain, an extraordinarily powerful person who can supervise that those laws are carried out.
5. Such an extraordinary, omnipotent person can be only God.
6. Hence, God exists.

The argument of the nature of established laws
1. Physical or scientific law is a scientific generalization based on empirical observations of physical behavior. Law is defined in the following ways:
a. Absolute. Nothing in the universe appears to affect them. (Davies, 1992:82)
b. Stable. They are unchanged since they were first discovered (although they may have been shown to be approximations of more accurate laws).
c. Omnipotent. Everything in the universe apparently must comply with them (according to observations). (Davies, 1992:83)
2. Some of the examples of scientific or nature’s laws are:
a. The law of relativity by Einstein.
b. The four laws of thermodynamics.
c. The laws of conservation of energy.
d. The uncertainty principle etc.
e. Biological laws
i. Life is based on cells.
ii. All life has genes.
iii. All life occurs through biochemistry.
iv. Mendelian inheritance.
f. Conservation Laws.
i. Noether's theorem.
ii. Conservation of mass.
iii. Conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum.
iv. Conservation of charge .
3. Einstein said that the laws already exist, man just discovers them.
4. Only an omnipotent, absolute eternal person can give absolute, stable and omnipotent laws for the whole universe.
5. That person all men call God or Krishna.
6. Hence God exists.


Arguments from Quantum mechanics

The argument of quantum mechanics
1. According to some experiments in quantum mechanics it is now proven that there are forces by which information spreads through the universe instantaneously, much faster than the speed of light. This is called quantum non-locality.
2. We know that nothing happens without consciousness or direction.
3. That all-pervading consciousness that is instantly transmitting information belongs to a superhuman person.
4. This is the dictionary definition of the person called God.
5. Therefore, God exists.

Argument from quantum physics
1. Sub-atomic particles seem to come into existence from nowhere. Nowhere means no designations, forms, names, qualities, activities; the quantum vacuum is not empty but has a super high energy density which is undetectable by the material senses and its measuring instruments. Or alternatively, this vacuum is another dimension then gross matter.
2. Either God is creating or manifesting the particles- the position of theism- or nothing is creating them- the position of atheism-. Creating means being brought from non-manifestation to manifestation.
3. It makes no sense to say that nothing is creating them. The particles also cannot come into existence by accident. nihil sine causa. ex nihilo nihil fit- from nothing, nothing comes. There is always causa causens – real cause, causa efficiens – mechanical cause and causa primaria- first cause. Every why has a therefore. There is no accident; we have called something chance for which we can't see a cause. No clock runs strikes or rings just like that. The course of nature is the art of God.
4. Therefore, God does exist.

The evidence of the conscious observer
1. How the concept of consciousness is something not material—nonphysical and non-chemical is proven by various experiments. In modern physics this is already a basic principle for the last fifty or sixty years, but not widely admitted or taught in the schools.
2. In modern physics or quantum mechanics the materialistic scientists realize that in order to describe physical processes you have to include the observer in the picture; you can't describe these things without accounting for the observer, and so they made an analysis. This was, for example, done by von Neumann, one of the modern physicists.
3. He analyzed the difference between the observer and the observed. For example, when a man looks through a microscope at some object, you can draw the line between the observer and the observed object.
4. Now, according to the physicist's idea, physically there are equations which describe all the molecules and forces of interaction on the observed side. And there's another kind of equation that goes in quantum mechanics, which corresponds to the observer's side, and this equation is completely different from the first equation.
5. So this indicates that the observer must be something different in nature from the observed.
6. The boundary between the observer and the observed can be moved and is kind of arbitrary. You can move the boundary back so now the observed becomes the eyeball and the microscope and the object, and the observer is still on the other side. And the basic idea is you can move this boundary back, step by step, and on one side you can put, at least in principle, more and more of the parts of the body into the observed system, but on the other side you still have the observer, and he continues to be described by an equation that can't be reduced to the force laws that are used to describe the observed.
7. So the conclusion is that the observer must be something nonphysical. He's not part of the physical body at all and that is basic in quantum mechanics.
8. There's also another line of evidence here. It's the inspiration. For example the mathematician Gauss who lived in the nineteenth century was solving various mathematical problems.
9. A very difficult mathematical problem, the person never solves by figuring it out consciously, step by step. What happens is that one tries very hard to figure out the solution for a long time, but nothing happens, and then all of a sudden the answer comes to him.
10. This is what many times happened to Gauss and he wrote down how, when and where.
11. There are many examples of sudden inspiration of various people in the fields of mathematics, art, philosophy, science etc.
12. The intelligence from where a sudden inspiration comes is the form direction of the nonphysical, transcendental Supersoul or God who is the observer of our soul’s desires, and rewards these according to karma.
13. God exists.

The proof of consciousness that preceded material reality
1. Materialism stated that consciousness is an 'emergent property' of material reality and thus has no particular special position within material reality.
2. However: “The stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter... we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.” (The mental Universe - Richard Conn Henry - Professor of Physics - Johns Hopkins University)
3. Thus consciousness preceded material reality and Quantum Mechanics (QM) reveals that consciousness has a special, even central, position1 within material reality.
4. The consciousness that preceded material reality is a property of a person all men call God.
5. God exists.

NOTE:
1. QM represents reality in terms of wave functions or probability functions. So how do we get from probability to actuality? That occurs by observation or conscious awareness, which shrinks probability down to a singular perception. All measurements or observations therefore depend on consciousness.

The quantum argument from love
1. Nothing exists, quite literally, in the beginning. All is at rest.
No qualities and activities are manifest in matter.
2. As Quantum Physics says, the universe at work is just that positively charged void. The quantum vacuum at time zero is not empty but has a high energy density, but inactive.
3. "Love" is the thing that caused this cosmic imbalance within nothingness, resulting in the appearance of things.
4. Therefore, God and His Goddess, the Supreme Lover and Beloved or the Supreme Beloved and Lover, the Causes of all love, exist.

Arguments from history

The proof of the 3.8 Billion year-old photosynthesis
1. “What we concluded is that, by discounting hydrogen peroxide oxidation, anoxygenic photosynthetic micro-organisms are the most likely mechanism responsible for Earth’s oldest iron formations,” Ernesto Pecoits of the Université Paris Diderot and lead author on the study told astrobio.net.
2. Microorganisms that photosynthesize in the absence of oxygen assimilate carbon by using iron oxide (Fe(II)) as an electron donor instead of water. While oxygenic photosynthesis produces oxygen in the atmosphere (in the form of dioxygen), anoxygenic photosynthesis adds an electron to Fe(II) to produce Fe(III).
3. “In other words, they oxidize the iron,” explains Pecoits. “This finding is very important because it implies that this metabolism was already active back in the early Archean (ca. 3.8 Billion year-ago).”
4. The abstract of the scientific research paper: "It is widely accepted that photosynthetic bacteria played a crucial role in Fe(II) oxidation and the precipitation of iron formations (IF) during the Late Archean–Early Paleoproterozoic (2.7–2.4 Ga). It is less clear whether microbes similarly caused the deposition of the oldest IF at ca. 3.8 Ga, which would imply photosynthesis having already evolved by that time. Abiological alternatives, such as the direct oxidation of dissolved Fe(II) by ultraviolet radiation may have occurred, but its importance has been discounted in environments where the injection of high concentrations of dissolved iron directly into the photic zone led to chemical precipitation reactions that overwhelmed photooxidation rates. However, an outstanding possibility remains with respect to photochemical reactions occurring in the atmosphere that might generate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a recognized strong oxidant for ferrous iron. Here, we modeled the amount of H2O2 that could be produced in an Eoarchean atmosphere using updated solar fluxes and plausible CO2, O2, and CH4 mixing ratios. Irrespective of the atmospheric simulations, the upper limit of H2O2 rainout was calculated to be pay-wall."
5. Atheistic science says the earth is 4.5 billion years old. The Vedas can agree with 2 billion years old.
Atheistic science teaches that it took 2 -2.5 billion years for the first life forms to come; the marine- or sea life. The Vedas say: “No, 2 billion years ago the creation of all the species started. God doesn’t need evolution. Yes, the beginning was sea life, but then very soon all the other evolutes.” Atheists say 4.5 billion because they see in the strata the marine fossils 2 billion years old, so they calculate it took 2- 2.5 billion years for these to come, so the earth is 4.5 billion. The Vedas say: “No, the earth population is since 2 billion years. The earth was created or again taken out of the Garbha ocean 2 billion years ago”
Life was manifest in the universe 2 billion years ago, again. The life comes and goes in cycles of Day and Night of the universe every 8.64 billion years. A Day is 4.32 billion years. A Night also 4.32 billon years. At the night of the universe, life in the universe is sleeping, but alive.
6. According to Srimad Bhagavatam 3.13, at the beginning of the day of Brahma, the earth is submerged in the Garbha Ocean and Lord Varaha brings it up. So the earth is not completely destroyed, but submerged. So there could be some iron there. The scientists could also have their dates wrong; in the first line of the article the scientists admit they are speculating when they say "discounting" and "the most likely mechanism".
7. The shells of the universe were created 155.521.972.949.116 years ago, but these shells are not visible for the telescopes; these are 2 billion yojanas away– this is on the scale of cosmic distances, many, many zillions of miles.
8. Atheistic science says that the Big Bangs in the quantum field started 10-15 billion years ago. From the Bang to gasses, condensing, etc to the earth planet is 5.5 billion years, by a gradual process.
9. Seeing the universe with 100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 perfectly round balls, some being cosmic lamps, circling in 5.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 orbits, never clashing,
the Vedas say it must have been a guided process by a Superhuman Engineer, Ball Thrower or Big Brain. He did it immediately, no need of evolving as in slow motion. So we come to the Big Bang/Brain taking place 2 billion years ago, not 10-15 billion y, by scientific reasoning.
9. B. The Big Brain evolved the Cosmos, along with a very detailed Manuel, the Veda.
In these Vedas, books of knowledge, we also find the history of the universe; all the data
we mentioned above.
10. God, the Supreme Person with the Biggest Brain, exists.
11. The History of the universe is as follows.
12. The modern Westerner knows atheism that explains that the predecessors of the monkeys and humans bubbled up from the primordial soup, which arose after the Big Bang. They say that the primitive humans came out of the hot Africa, mainly through the Caucasus area, to Central and Northern Asia Europe, because this was the only access by land to the north when the ice melted in the North and the North became habitable.
13. Directly south of the Caucasus spring the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. This area is the country of origin of Abraham's family. This is where Adam and Eve lived after they lost paradise or the Garden of Eden. The mountain "Ararat" in the southern part of the Caucasus is the mountain where Noah's Ark released the surviving species.
14. This is the homeland of the Indo-European Caucasian (white) race.
15. The Vedic literature has an origin story that is different from the previous, yet it has intriguing surprising parallels. According to the Vedas, everything starts with Sri Narayana, God, Krishna.
16. The Aitareya Upanishad states that He (God) thought: "Shall I bring forth the worlds?” And he brought forth the worlds. After being inspired by hearing mantra- divine sound- Brahma created the world. At the beginning of Brahma's life the mantra was Aum or OM, but later it became the mantra: klim krishnaya govindaya gopijanavallabaya svaha. These are names of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Krishna means All-Attractive, Govinda, the herder of wish-fulfilling cows, Gopijanavallabha, the one in love with the divine cowherd-women.
17. One of Brahma's sons was Marici. His son was Kasyapa Muni. From this Muni came, about 120 million years ago, at the beginning of this manvantara (era), the Indo-Europeans. Kasyapa Muni meditated near the Caspian Sea, which is named after him.
See step 12 and 13, how this is parallel with modern science and the western and middle-east religions.
18. From the marriage of Kasyapa and Aditi, Vivasvan, the sun god was born. Also the Sri Rama Avatara (incarnation, literally one who descends from the spiritual world to the material world), God, took His birth in Vivasvan’s family or the Surya-vamsa, the family of the progenitor Surya, the sun god.
19. From the marriage of Kasyapa and Diti came the Daityas - "of Diti" - or demons. They spread over the West (Europe). The names "Titans" and "Teutons" were given later and are derived from the word daitya.
20. Another son of Brahma was Atri. Soma or Candra (the divine manifestation or demigod, who governs the moon) came from Atri. Buddha (not of the Buddhists), the king of the planet Mercury came from Candra. A son of Buddha was Pururava. Ayu came from him. From Ayu came Nahusha and from Nahusha, Yajati. Yajati had five sons, including Yadu. From Yadu came the Yadu dynasty in which Krishna and Balarama appeared. The Vaisnavas consider Vishnu an expansion of Krishna, and thus under Krishna and Krishna as the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
21. From Yayati's son Puru came the Kuru dynasty in which Bhisma, Dhritarastra, Arjuna, Yudhisthira, Bhima , Duryodhana and Maharaja Pariksit were born.
22. Another son of Puru was Pravira. His son was Manasyu ("yu," the uniter) also called Menes, who according to Western historians founded the first dynasty in Egypt. The name Paurava's, Puru's descendants, later corrupted to "Pharaohs." Yadu and the other sons of Yayati were forced to work under Puru. Eventually they went out of Egypt and were persecuted. Here Judaism arose.
23. Egypt was named after Ajapati, the son of the Aja clan. Aja was the grandfather of Lord Sri Ramacandra. Sri Ramacandra appeared in the Surya-vamsa (family) of Vivasvan and Vaivasvata Manu. Another name for Suryadeva (an expansion of Krishna) God immanent is Ravi. Ra was their supreme God, the creator of this branch of the Surya vamsa. Siva or (Maha) Isvara, the controller of the material world, became Osiris.
The pyramids were built on the model of the smasana-cit altars for the Vedic cremation rituals. The positions of the various parts of the building reflect the positions of the stars and the upper parts points out for the soul, the Pitri-lokas, a kind of heavenly planets.
24. Also, some members of the Pandava family came to Egypt (and Europe) after Dvaraka, Krishna's residence on this planet, disappeared. They settled in Ishwar (God) laya (country) or Israel. From the Essenes (Isa means controller, a name of Siva. They were worshipers of Siva) came Jesus (Isa) Christ (of Krishna).
25. Three other rebellious sons of Yajati got kingdoms outside India. Yavana (or Turvasu) got Turkey, Persia. According to the Mahabharata (Adi Parva 85.34) Turvasu fought for Duryodhana on the battlefield of Kuruksetra. Anu was given Greece and Italy.
26. Again there was a migration, put in motion by Parasurama (also a descendant of Pururava) who drove out a branch of the Yadu's demonic Haihaya kings and followers, mainly to Egypt. They were kings there. Some came to Europe and mingled with the barbarians there and others settled in the border regions of Europe and Asia, Turkey and Greece.
27. Around 4000 BC Druhyus, the fifth son of Yayati, was exiled to Europe. From Druhyu came the Druids, who were in turn connected to the Dravidians, followers of the wise man ("vid") Drastha. Some barbarian tribes (more or less ksatriya) came from him. This settled mainly in France and England.
28. Around the same time the Saxena's, a ksatriya clan, were expelled from India. These were the Saxons, who settled in Western Europe.
29. The Kuruksetra war in 3138 BC, described in the Mahabharata and where the Bhagavad-Gita was spoken by Krishna, destroyed the global varnasrama-dharma system, or Vedic social-political system and it gradually fell into disrepair.
30. Before this the Vedic culture was more or less everywhere, but mainly in India. Civilization means living in a pleasant environment, such as the tropics. Therefore Patala-bhumi (the hellish or low land), the western hemisphere and particularly the north, were avoided.
31. Around 2000 BC various groups of India’s Indo-Europeans left to go to the west. Just as it had already happened before: to teach (such as a group of shamans, scholars, which later became known as Germans), to rule and to establish varnasrama-dharma system or to emigrate, because the river Sarasvati was dried up. Also some were exiled after the decline of the Vedic lifestyle.
32. In 800 BC the Kalatoya came to the West. They were from the area south of Kashmir. These became the Celts. They left India in 2000 BC when the river Sarasvati dried up. In 1000 BC they arrived at the Danube, the river that flows through the land of the Danavas or demons.
33. The people of Alinas (Hellenes) were one of the first who migrated from India (to Greece, in Greek "Hellas"). According to the Mahabharata (Adi Parva 174.38) Bhima and Sahadeva conquered the Pulindas (Greeks) because they had given up dharma.
33b. Thus in any part of the Earth we, mortals, can trace our origin and genealogical table or tree.
One of our common ancestors or forefathers is Kasyapa Rsi (=muni or sage), whose father is Marici. His father is Brahma, whose cause is Garbhodakasayi Visnu, who is from Maha-Visna, who is from Maha-Sankarsana. Above Him is Sankarsana or Balarama in Dvaraka, then above Him is Mula– or  Adi-Sankarsana or Balarama in Vrndavana, then Krishna, The First, The Supreme Personality of Godhead.
34. The word Norway is derived from the Sanskrit narak, or hell. Soviet comes from sveta (white). Russia from rushis or rsis (sages), who meditated there. Siberia from the Sanskrit word for inhospitable, camping. Scandinavia from Skanda, the commander of the denizens of heaven. They navigated on behalf of Skanda and worshiped Skanda.
The word Viking and the English "king" is derived from the Sanskrit singh (lion). The Vikings were big white-haired daityas.
35. The Alpine name is derived from "alpa", small. They are small compared to the Himalayas.
36. In many places in Europe murti's (images) of Krishna, Shiva and other divine manifestations were found.
37. According to the puranas, the history books of the Vedas, and the smaller puranas, the Upa puranas, there were floods around 11,000 BC to the end of the Ice Age. Vaivasvata Manu (Noah) and his family were, thanks to their boat, practically the only survivors. After twelve great wars between the deva's (divine) and the asuras (demons, the wicked) east of the Caucasus was assigned to the deva's and west to the asuras. Both were members of the Surya-vamsa.
38. Some asuras were along with Maya-danava exiled to South America, Patala bhumi / loka, or the inferior country under (and opposite of) Punya-Bhumi, the pious or prosperous land. Maya-danava is the engineer under the Danavas. His permanent residence is Talatala-loka (9000 yojanas south of the Bhu-mandala) where the UFOs, flying saucers, are created. The Mayans, followers of Mayadanava, called their land Amaraka of "Amaru" (immortal). Asuras often think that death is something that will not happen to them.
39. Evolution and Big Bang are wrong. Thus God did the Creation. God descended 5000 years ago.
40. Krishna, God, exists.

Arguments from philosophy of science

The proof that there is no proof that God does not exist; there is no evidence, and experience that non-gods (chance, forces, energies, nature) control the events in the cosmos. It can only be done by divine persons.
1. No scientists has been able to show or prove by experiment or even by theory all the steps from before the Big Bang to the molecules, amino acids, proteins, microbes, plants, fishes, reptiles, mammals to the 7 billion humans as per the year 2015.
2. Even if some scientist could imitate some steps of the process in nature then it was he, the person, who in his laboratory did, what the gods are already doing in nature; he made it in his laboratory, proving that there is no chance or mechanistic evolution in nature.
3. In human society no events are done by chance, forces, energies or nature.
4. The cosmos is created, maintained and active because of Gods, unseen persons. That is the only way it can be explained.
5. The hierarchy or system of divine managers of the cosmos ends with the Supreme Personality of Godhead in heaven as the hierarchy of managers of the prison house and state has at the top the king in his palace.
6. There is no proof or argument against God’s existence; that Brahman (spiritual light) or sunya (zero) or any non-god create and control.
7. God exists.

The argument of the supreme scientist
1. When we think calmly and carefully about this wonderful universe, we can see that everything is working under the control of a supreme brain. The arrangements in nature are perfectly ordered. Things would be at random without the careful planning of a scientific and engineering brain. It is a common understanding that there is a cause behind each action. A machine cannot run without an operator. Modern scientists are very proud of automation, but there is a scientific brain behind automation also. When we talk about “brain” and “operator,” these terms imply a person.
2. Examples of the wonderful creations of the Supreme Scientist, the Supreme Creator Krishna.
- The energy the sun emits in one second is greater than the whole amount of energy the human species has consumed throughout its entire history. Yet it is only one of the countless number of stars floating in the sky. This material universe is running like intricate, well-oiled clockwork according to great natural physical laws and principles. Scientists have gained great acclaim for making a few spaceships, whereas Krishna effortlessly produces gigantic spaceships, such as planets and stars, which are perfectly equipped and maintained. Each year the seasons change quite periodically, producing symptoms unique to each season.
-The molecular framework for each definite color or aroma is wonderfully unique. A little change in position of a few atoms in the molecule, a little variation in the geometry of the molecule or a slight change in the size of the molecule can cause a color to change from orange to red, a mild, pleasing aroma to become repellent and pungent, and a flavor to change from sweet to bitter.
-Charcoal, graphite and diamonds are all derived from the same element, carbon, and yet the shining and transparent diamond is extremely hard, whereas graphite is soft, black and opaque. This is due to the difference in the crystalline forms of these molecules. In the crystal lattice of the diamond, each carbon atom is tetrahedrally surrounded by four other carbon atoms at a distance of 1.54 angstroms (one angstrom = 10<-8> cm.). In graphite, by contrast, the three bonds of each carbon atom are distorted so as to lie in the same plane, the fourth bond being directed perpendicularly to this plane to link with a carbon atom of the neighboring layer.
In this way we can cite innumerable examples of molecular networks so fantastically and delicately arranged that chemists cannot but wonder about the most expert hand and brain who is making all these wonderful artistic arrangements in His laboratory. *
-Professor R.B. Woodward of Harvard, a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry (1965) and Professor A. Eschenmoser of Zurich took eleven years to synthesize the vitamin B12 molecule. Altogether, ninety-nine scientists from nineteen different countries were involved just to accomplish this one small task. Yet Krishna is making all these complex molecules at will, in a moment.
3. The Supreme Scientist (Inventor and Creator), God exists.

The proof of reincarnation (A) and liberation (B)
A
1. Ian Stevenson a psychiatrist and the director of the Division of Perceptual Studies at the University of Virginia School of Medicine became well known for his research into reincarnation, the idea that emotions, memories, and even physical injuries in the form of birthmarks, can be transferred from one life to another.
2. Over a period of 40 years, he recorded 3,000 cases of children around the world who claimed to remember past lives, providing thus a nowadays respected collection of scientific proof for reincarnation.
3. Many persons claiming to have lived before exhibit special skills, such as playing an instrument or speaking a language they appeared not to have learned. The many details that were recorded from them were all verified for example the name, living place, the names of family members and stories connected to them.
4. The Vedic wisdom similarly speaks about the soul reincarnating from one life to another carrying with him the particular way of thinking, feelings and desires. As long as there are material desires and material attachments to this material world one has to be born again.
5. It is seen that a particular soul takes birth in a particular family which has a similar mentality or talent; since the soul cannot choose in which family to take birth there must be a controller that guides his wanderings life after life.
6. That guide has to be all-pervading to know the mentalities of all the living entities.
7. This is the description of God who guides all the souls, life after life.
8. God exists.

The proof of the dynamite made tunnel.
1. Atheist: Our theory is that there was a big chunk and from that everything else came.
It exploded. A big bang occurred within some chemicals. If you think the term chunk outdated, it can be compared in modern science with a field or cloud of singularities, which are big banging and creating multi-universes.
2. Theist: Where did the chunk come from? As a hill of earth is composed of many sub-atomic particles in a specific, highly complex structure of atoms and molecules, you have to prove that impersonal forces will act, or are acting and create a primordial situation– the chunk. You have to put a collection of sub-atomic particles in a certain place and see what happens.
Where is the evidence that a chunk explodes automatically? We do not have that experience. There is an explosion within a mountain to create a tunnel when there is dynamite and the dynamite is provided by someone. How can an explosion take place without the hand of someone, a living entity? Where is the proof of matter acting automatically? First of all, the question will be, "Who made this chunk?" Then, the next question will be, "How did the explosion take place unless it was arranged by a living being?”
Is there any evidence that matter explodes without a living being's touch?
3. Atheist: Yes, the sun. There are so many explosions going on within the sun every day.
4. Theist: That is the philosophy of vriscika-tandula-nyaya - a hill of rice gives birth to scorpions. Explosions are going on, but behind all these explosions, all these transformations, is the Supreme Lord. If there is a gas leak or high voltage electricity in a house or factory and an explosion takes place, someone made the gas tank or pipes, or the electricity system in which the explosion took place.
Has anyone seen the Big Bang starting to create by nature or quantum fluctuations? As you say, “Show me. Seeing is believing.”
5. Atheist: Did you see the beginning?
6. Theist: We see a man-made planetarium, robots, dummies, plastic flowers etc. built by designers who are conscious entities. Therefore logically the Big Bang had intelligent designers, engineers and builders.
You are postulating the chunk and that it exploded, but you cannot explain how the chunk exploded. Sometimes we see that a patch of earth is heated by the sunshine and eventually causing it to crack. Sometimes we see miles of cracked clay. It is due to the sunshine drying it and at a certain point it breaks. Similarly, the total material energy in the form of a chunk, or a sea of particles, is agitated by the glance of Maha-vishnu and the modes of material nature begin to act. He can agitate the material energy, and the creation begins. Just like you'll find on the ground, so many flowers and grasses are coming up. How? By the sunrise, the glance of the sun. Where there is no sunshine, there the vegetables do not grow. We have got practical experience. If there is no sun, the field or the earth is not exploding with the vegetation. It is due to the sunshine. Therefore it is coming out. To the foolish person, the power behind the explosion is not visible. Naham prakasah sarvasya yoga-maya-samavritah [Bg. 7.25]. Krishna says that "I am not visible to everyone, they are being covered by the curtain of yoga-maya." Mudhah nabhijanati mam ebhyah param avyayam. Tribhir gunamayir bhavair mohitah. We do not know who is the architect of the material creation. That is Maha-vishnu, God immanent. There are many isvaras– controllers. Even in this material world there are innumerable isvaras, but the sastra has analyzed that the supreme isvara is Krishna. Isvarah paramah krishnah [Bs. 5.1]: "There is no higher isvara than Krishna." Krishna also says, mattah parataram nanyat: [Bg. 7.7] "There is no more. This is the end." As behind the designers, engineers and builders of the tunnel under the mountain, is the government, and the government is controlled by the president.
7. God exists, and enjoys in heaven.

The proof of eternal consciousness moving matter
1. Atheist: you say that it is life which makes matter move, but we scientists don't accept that.
2. Theist: How it is moving?
3. Atheist: It's a certain combination of matter.
4. Theist: You make it. That means experiment. You simply observe, but you have no experiment. Therefore it is not science.
You have to demonstrate knowledge.
You make in the laboratory or science institute, matter moving by this combination. Otherwise it is useless. Therefore two things must be there: observation and experiment, practical and theoretical. Theoretical—something is there moving. Now you make it practical to see that this chemical combination is the original cause. Now take the chemicals and make experiment.
b. First of all explain something theoretically, as on high school: "Hydrogen, oxygen-mix together it becomes water." It is faith. Then it is practically shown in the laboratory. So faith is the beginning. Theoretical knowledge means faith. Then experiment.
c. Atheist: “It is DNA, RNA”. Theist: If you know what is life or the cause, then why don't you replace it in a dead body and make it alive? What is that DNA? Put it into use. In the classroom you theorize: "This DNA is going this way, that way..." Now, who has made this arrangement, exactly going and in the same way all the time? You cannot manufacture DNA and the movements also. Very wonderful things are going on. You try to imitate nature, and you cannot; nature has better scientists then you.
d. You give any explanation except eternal consciousness. You give some alternative explanation than eternal consciousness; you say chance, just nature doing, quantum-so-and-so. But if you proof these forces in a scientific experiment you have proven that consciousness is the cause.
5. Atheist: It is some wonderful chemical mixture that we have not discovered yet, very mysterious chemistry. It is all based on this idea of a study of quantum forces, genes and chromosomes, genetics. We have so many words for describing how it happens.
Theist: Jugglery, word jugglery.
Atheist: DNA, RNA.
Theist: But still you can't explain the power force that activates them. You still can't explain the actual source of power that activates those chemicals.
6. Theist: Make an egg.
Atheist: In principle we can make all chemicals in the egg.
But they don't make life, yet.
Theist: In the future you can do everything, but at the end it is failure.
Atheist: The chemical composition of the egg can be synthesized.
Theist: I say that you do it, and make it egg-shaped, and now we have artificial incubation.
Why take the egg from the chicken?
Atheist: We can make the chemicals, but life cannot come out of that.
Theist: Then why do you say that life comes from chemicals? Why do you make this false propaganda? That is our protest. You cannot do it, and still you make false propaganda.
7. Atheist: Khorana from MIT, the Indian who got the Nobel Prize some years ago, is one of the big scientists in this molecular biology. He synthesized this code gene, one of the small fragments of the DNA molecule. It's supposed to be the basic molecule for all living systems. So the promise was about ten years ago that once they synthesized this gene, complete synthesis, then they'll be able to make life in the test tube. But it's not working. They have synthesized it now. We failed.
8. Life/ eternal consciousness/ God and the eternal soul cause matter to move.
9. God exists.

The argument of the science of science
1. Atheist: we can see that by these inborn laws of nature all these things are going on. We don't see where there is need of some person behind it. These things are going on. Each planet has its own gravitational force; therefore they are balancing each other in the universe.
2. Theist: You do that. You float one ball if you are so confident.
3. Atheist: I cannot do it, but nature is doing it.
4. Theist: You do not know who is doing. You are thinking everyone like you. Everyone is thinking that 'the other party is like me.' When a planetarium is seen, a child says ‘it is just going on’, but the only cause is a designer and constructor.
a. God– Lord Ramacandra- throws a stone,  it floats because He is God. When you throw a stone, it will drown. When God makes one big planet floating, it floats. You cannot do it.
b. You have no power to evaporate water and make it into a cloud and distribute it. Very easily it is being done. Then why don't you accept somebody's doing that? There are oceans and seas. Why you scientist cannot bring the water, make a cloud and pour water? Where is that science? When drops and streams come from your shower you know there is intelligence behind it. When similarly rain comes down from the clouds there is a superhuman intelligence behind it.
c. Anything you do or make, it requires intelligence. Similarly, God’s intelligence invisibly acts in Nature.
d. Just like someone has made a garland of flowers. Somebody intelligent has made this decoration. So who has made the flowers and leaves?  Someone made this garland, one red flower, then yellow flower etc, to make it very attractive, but who has made this flower? I am taking the flowers to make it more beautiful by setting them in this way, but who has made this beautiful flower? Whose brain is there?
You have to accept. Because you are somebody, you are trying to make something more beautiful by setting up the different flowers, so which somebody has made the flower?
e. That is intelligence. There must be some brain. That is philosophy. Philosophy means to search out the ultimate, the Absolute Truth, God, the first cause.
Janmady asya yatah [SB 1.1.1]. Athato brahma jijnasa. That is philosophy. Philosophy is the science of science. Sarva-karana-karanam [Bs. 5.1]. The first science.
5. Atheist:  Say what is God. What do you mean by God?
6. Theist: "God is the force moving the universe," A child can also see the force. But behind the force, who is there? Whenever there is force, there must be one person forceful, who is forcing. That is God.
7. God exists.

The argument that nature as the Supreme Cause cannot be shown and seen
1. Atheist: Nature has generated everything on its own. Just like theists say that God did it.
2. Theist: Where is that nature, generating everything? Where is that nature? Show me.
3. Atheist: Corn produces the seeds as well as the plant.
4. Theist: Then wherefrom the corn came?
5. Atheist: From itself. You see, we theorize that naturally…
6. Theist: Theorize, theorize. But we see corn is produced when the seeds are thrown on the ground, then corns are produced. Wherefrom is the corn coming. The corn is not dropping from the sky.
7. Atheist: Originally…
8. Theist: You have not seen an original coming by itself.
9. Atheist: Well, originally, we say, it was just some chance combination of atoms and molecules…
10. Theist: Chance means you are a rascal. Nothing takes place with chance. Plastic flowers are made by a person designing and creating. God, similarly, designs and creates the flowers and everything else in the cosmos from the original subatomic particles.
11. God exists.

The argument on the first cause
1. Atheists often argue that theists are trapped in an infinite regress.  They challenge, “If God made everything, who made God?” as if the only answer is a God-maker, who required a God-maker-maker, and so on.  But the argument clings just as much, if not more so, to the atheist.  Since nobody can think the universe came from absolutely nothing (i.e., no mass, no energy, no categories, no information, no concepts); since nothing or no-thing does not exist, everybody has to start with an eternal reality – an uncaused cause.  The question then becomes if the eternal reality is personal or impersonal.  But why then or how would an impersonal reality ever give rise to personality? We have no experience of such a happening; this has never ever happened. But personalities being productive of persons and impersonal or matter we see only and always. And how would a personal being be able to know it to be true, unless truth also presupposes personal cognition?  The personal uncaused cause is therefore a superior starting point.
2. A supreme person who is the uncaused cause of everything is a definition of God.
3. God exists.

The proof of God in every non-human movement of the material world
1. Darwin's theory begins in the ocean. He says that some fish-type animal climbed out of the ocean and began to breathe the air.
2. Challenge: Then wherefrom the ocean came?
3. “In the beginning on the planet there was great turbulence and the oceans were stirring, and then there was some lightning charge.”
4. Challenge: Wherefrom the lightning came? And wherefrom the ocean came?
5. “It all began from a primeval explosion.”
6. Challenge: Then same question, wherefrom the explosion came?
7. “That explosion began at time zero. Time began then, at time zero. And if you ask the question, "What was before that?" that's not a logical, sensible question. It's a question that should not even be asked.”
8. Challenge: You are beginning from zero. How you can begin from zero? Everything comes from nothing then. Space is an infinity of points, so time is an infinity of single instants, with no beginning and end.
9. “It all originates from a giant mass of primordial matter.”
10. Challenge: Then same question comes "Wherefrom the matter comes?”
11. “It's an accident.”
12. Challenge: Where is the accident? Nothing is accident, everything is cause and effect. In the beginning there was God. That is the beginning. Janmady asya yatah [SB 1.1.1]. Aham evasam agree [SB 2.9.33]. And Bhagavad-gita, aham sarvasya prabhavah mattah sarvam pravartate [Bg. 10.8]. This is proven philosophy. "Everything begins from God." Now you can say, "Wherefrom God came?" But that is God. God is eternally existing, He is not caused by any other cause, He is the original cause. Anadir adih: "He has no beginning, but He is the beginning of everything." This is the conception of God. Anadir adir govindah [Bs. 5.1]. That adi is Govinda, person, Krishna. Krishna says, aham adir hi devanam [Bg 10.2]. We find from the history. Brahma -the designer and creator of the material world- is the beginning. He is deva, one of the demigods. Krishna says, aham adir hi devanam. So He is the cause of Brahma also.  This is the only possible philosophy. It doesn't begin from zero or accident. This is not philosophy. As you eternal soul is the cause of so many bodies and other creations– house, technology, children etc. and are without cause, the first cause, so God is the cause of the Material Cosmic Prison. And He lives Himself beyond that Prison.
13. God and Heaven exist.

The argument of the magician of the hyper quantum mechanics
1. Lawrence M. Krauss is a theoretical physicist and director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University.
2. In his latest book, he claims to have shown why the latest physics proves that God is not necessary to explain the universe’s existence and features.
3. Krauss claims to demonstrate how quantum gravity not only allows our universe and other universes to pop into existence out of nothing (that is, without the agency of a divine being), but that quantum gravity actually appears to require nothing.
4. In the flyleaf, the publisher writes that Krauss has provided an “antidote to outmoded philosophical and religious thinking,” and a “game-changing entry into the debate about the existence of God and everything that exists.”
5. But has Krauss really proven that “God is dead”?
6. His fans may say so, but Krauss himself backs away slightly from such a bold claim. Rather, he admits that “one cannot rule out such a deistic view of nature.” This deistic view “bears no logical connection to the personal deities of the world’s great religions.” In other words, God may not be dead, but, according to Krauss, he certainly is not personal or presently active.
7. One reason why God, if he exists, may not be personal is that the universe appears to add up to nothing.
8. Only in a flat geometry universe (like ours appears to be) does the total “Newtonian gravitational energy” of each cosmic object equal zero. This happens because the negative energy of gravitational attraction cancels out the positive energy of motion. Therefore, the net energy of the universe is zero and if that’s the case, then the universe is essentially nothing. Krauss implies that if the universe really adds up to nothing, why then must we feel compelled to invoke “Someone” (like God) to explain its cause?
9. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite established the spatial curvature of the universe, Ωk, to be between -0.0174 and +0.0051, where 0.0000 represents perfect flatness. Consequently, Krauss does have a strong case for the total Newtonian gravitational energy of the universe being zero or very close to zero. However, there is more to the universe than Newtonian gravitational energy.
10. Imagine someone throwing a shot put straight up in the air, at one point when the shot’s upward kinetic energy exactly equals the downward gravitational energy, although its motion energy is zero, we cannot say the shot put is nothing. It is still a sphere of metal that weighs sixteen pounds.
12. Similarly, though the total Newtonian gravitational energy of the universe is zero, the universe still contains a huge amount of heat left over from the cosmic creation event and enormous quantities of dark energy, exotic dark matter, ordinary dark matter, and visible galaxies, stars, planets, dust, and gas.
Energy movements may be neutralized but we see movements and the substance and its order need a cause. Thus Krauss’s theory is very limited.
13. Further, Krauss proposes that virtual particle production serves as an analogy for how the universe came to exist.
14. Virtual particle production is a natural outcome of the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.
15. The quantum fluctuations in the universe’s space-time fabric generate particles, provided those particles revert to quantum space-time fluctuations before any human observer can detect their appearance. Since these particles cannot be detected directly, physicists refer to them as virtual particles. Krauss suggests that the entire universe may have popped into existence by the same means.
16. However, on this idea we have to make a note. For a system as massive as the observable universe, the time for it to arise from nothingness (the space-time fabric) and revert back to nothingness (the space-time fabric) must be less than 10-102 seconds (101 zeroes between the decimal point and 1). Arising, Generating Operating, reverting and Destroying can be only done by G-O-D (Generating-Operating-Destroying) or God doing this magic. The probability of a quantum outcome occurring increases in proportion to the passage of time. That is, the larger the time interval, the greater the probability that a quantum outcome, like the production of a virtual particle, will take place. This principle implies that if the time interval is zero, the probability for any quantum event is zero.
17. The space-time theorems prove that time has a beginning coincident with the beginning of the universe. Thus, the time interval at the beginning of the universe is zero. This eliminates quantum mechanics as a possible candidate for being the natural generator of the universe.
18. Krauss proposes that—in addition to the observable quantum mechanics constrained to space and time—there is an unobserved hyper quantum mechanics that exists beyond our universe. The Vedas call this pradhana (part of the causal ocean) the original stock of matter. Here some dimension (or dimensions) of time, entirely distinct from cosmic time, would permit space-time bubbles, independent of the space or time dimensionality posited to exist beyond our universe, to pop into existence spontaneously. In the Veda this is done by time (kala) personified – Maha Vishnu.
19. However, if the hyper quantum mechanics is anything like the quantum mechanics we observe, then the space-time bubbles must also disappear spontaneously within extremely brief time episodes.
20. Krauss acknowledges that his appeal to some imagined hyper quantum mechanics to explain the origin of the universe leads to a time episode problem. He suggests that the problem might be solved if the universe experiences a very aggressive inflationary expansion event before the hyper quantum mechanics forced the newly generated space-time bubble (our universe) to disappear.
Only God can do this. Only an engineer expands. There is no proof of another agent.
21. Inflation, the integral part of big bang cosmology, refers to the brief but rapid exponential expansion of the early universe by a factor of at least 1078 in volume.
22. For our universe, the inflation epoch lasted between 10-36 and 10-33 seconds. It occurred near the very beginning of the electroweak era, during which three forces of physics existed: gravity, the strong nuclear force, and the electroweak force.
23. The electroweak force is actually a blending of electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. This blending occurs only when the universe is very young and, hence, very hot.
24. However, if the universe is too young, the electroweak force will blend with the strong nuclear force. When our universe was about 10-35 seconds old, the strong-electroweak force separated into the strong nuclear force and the electroweak force.
25. Accordingly, an inflation episode cannot begin in our universe until the universe is 10-35 seconds old. This albeit extremely brief time interval is 1067 times longer than the time duration for a universe like ours to appear and then disappear via the quantum pathway that produces virtual particles. This means it cannot/doesn’t exist anymore before it can start to expand. Thus the theory of Krauss disappears into nothingness.
26. Thus the space-time theorem establishes that in all viable inflationary big bang models the universe is subject to a beginning in finite time. The implication is that they thus require a causal Agent beyond space and time to explain their existence.
27. That causal agent can be only God.
28. God the Supreme Engineer and Magician exists.

The argument of the book – God Is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens
1. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything is a 2007 book by the author and journalist Christopher Hitchens (1949–2011) in which he criticizes religion.
2. He hardly breaks a sweat in arguing that God does not exist; nevertheless, he thinks that he has established it as beyond question.
3. For Hitchens’s attack on all gods and religions to be successful, however, he would need to furnish a strong argument denying the supernatural realm. Only then would it follow that all the gods of all the religions would be merely of human design. How a cloud of subatomic particles floating in an area of empty space combine and produce something. Hitchens’s supernatural realm is electricity or thunderbolts, pressures, explosions and magic or chance. But there is no experiment where these have produced anything without an engineer manipulating these. We say supernatural because have you ever seen a cloud in the sky suddenly producing thunder and explosions. Only by interacting with external objects can that happen. But this is not the situation before the Big Bang. There was nothing then particles. And thunderbolts have only caused destruction. There is no happy report of a thunderstruck.
4. Arguments against theism are made in chapters 5 (“The Metaphysical Claims of Religion Are False”) and 6 (“Arguments from Design”)
In both topics he is thin and shrill; neither demonstrates even the slightest awareness of the philosophical and scientific arguments for the existence of a personal and moral creator and designer of the universe.
Hitchens does not offer any new insights in the debate against religion.
Atheist "arguments" regarding religion tend to fall into two categories: actual logical arguments and whining about the evils of religion. Hitchens's book falls firmly in the second camp.
He mentions (without attribution) several Christian thinkers to the effect that Christianity is opposed to reason.
For example, Thomas Aquinas who said, “I am a man of one book,” in this way he misleads the unsuspecting reader into thinking that Christianity always pits religious faith against reason. And he doesn’t mention that this book “Summa Theologica” has 4000 pages.
5. Hitchens scavenges around for many bad examples of illogic, ignorance, and outright stupidity in religion. The straw man makes many loud-mouthed appearances in god Is Not Great. He wrote "an agonizingly long laundry list of nasty things done in the name of religion."
For him, if religious people behave badly, that counts against God. On the other hand, if they behave well, that means nothing because non-religious people can also behave well.
6. He exposes an unsettling new strategy among the "New Atheists": Forget building sound arguments. Simply accuse, slander, and misrepresent, and do it the loudest and rudest way possible.
7. His constant mocking of religion just because of its history of inhumanity does nothing to counteract the claim of religion defenders, that Jihadists are not true Muslims and that Crusaders were not true Christians.
8. Bizarre attacks on Mother Theresa.
9. True, Christians often have been unchristian and positively immoral; Christians have acted in ways that betray what the Bible teaches.
But, Christianity was at the start and heart of the scientific revolution in Europe, beginning around the middle of the sixteenth century.
10. Alfred North Whitehead argued that modern science was born in a Christian cradle.
11. He ignores (or chooses to ignore) the many arguments of modern religious apologists; there is no mention of any of these.
12. It also just begs for a theist to write a counter-"argument"-- a list of nasty things done in the name of money, greed, power, etc.
13. Hitchens doesn't really make any arguments. He instead gives numerous anecdotes about religious people engaging in selfish, violent, perverse, and ignorant behaviour. There's no question that religious people often fail to live good lives, but this in itself doesn't amount to an argument against religion as such, anymore than similar examples of atheists behaving badly would amount to an argument against atheism. Both atheists and believers are sometimes noble and sometimes base.
14. Hitchens argues that religion “poisons everything,” but a strong historical case can be made that Christianity in particular has motivated a host of beneficial movements in history.
SOME ERRORS IN THE BOOK
15. "Jews borrowed and plagiarized Hanukah from the Christians."
15 a. Not correct, Hanukah occurred 160 years before Jesus was born.
16. Hitchens says that Spinoza's body was stolen after his death and desecrated by his tribe members (the Jews).
16a. Again, an invention; Spinoza was buried in the churchyard of the Nieuwe Kerk on Spui in The Hague.
17. He rejects the Old Testament as having been disproved by revisionist archaeology.
17a. These conclusions are far from self-evident, as opposing scholars have noted.
18. He invokes Hume’s famous critique of miracles.
18 a. He is not aware that this argument has fallen on very hard times in contemporary philosophy.
19. He really lacks a good scholarship of philosophy, history and science and gentleness.
20. Hitchens ridicules the argument from design more than he rationally challenges it. He uses the standard argument that nature manifests too many defects to be designed.
21. He claims, e.g., that the human eye is inefficiently designed and ineptly fashioned, although the stock argument for this is false.
Religionists counter that this world is the prison house for the rebel souls of paradise, as Adam and Eve were put out of the Garden of Eden. The prison house is to be limited, defective and miserable. The gates/bars of the prison house (the senses) give limited view. Nor we find inside the prison luxurious, luscious, heavenly gardens. Similarly the eye is defective, limited and views the world of misery.
22. William Dembski argues that if something in nature cannot be accounted for on the basis of chance and/or natural law, then the best explanation for its basic structure is design—that is, intelligent causation.
23. The complex and specified informational patterns in DNA cannot be the result of natural laws because they are too complicated; nor can their specificity be explained by chance combinations because these are too improbable.
24. The best explanation for this genetic language, therefore, is a designer.
25. ID theorists conclude that design inference proves all of the important attributes of God, and their arguments spell trouble for naturalism, which attempts to account for everything in nature on the basis of impersonal chance and necessity. Although there is no proof or experiment that a pile of particles left in open air under nature’s sky will ever start to do something, nor will ever start exploding, create thunderbolts and these acting back on themselves will develop themselves into a mango tree.
26. Hitchens hymns the praises of the knowledge gained from the Human Genome Project, but he doesn't mention what he surely knows--that the project's leader, Francis Collins, has made his Christian commitment quite public.
27. Nature, according to atheism, was not created or designed by a rational Mind. To atheists, mindless matter precedes the appearance of minds. However, no laboratory experiment has been done, proving that matter on its own, without a human mind involved, can evolve to E-coli’s, then to fishes, reptiles, monkeys, 7 billion humans.
28. Criticizing bad examples of people of various religions does not disprove religions are bad especially not because of God who in the scriptures gives very high standard to be attained – a saintly behaviour.
29. Not mentioning at all and not refuting in his book the various arguments for God’s existence weakens his case against religion and God.
30. Despite his greatest will, he could not establish that God does not exist.
31. God exists.

The argument of transposons vs. ‘selfish genes’ of Dawkins
1.  In 1976, evolutionist Richard Dawkins described[1] how he thought life on earth was characterized by selfish genes competing for propagation within the genomes of countless creatures.
2. Since then, science has discovered the unique segments of DNA called transposons able to insert copies of themselves into plant and animal DNA. Are transposons trying to take over their host genomes, thus demonstrating the selfish behavior described by Dawkins? The answer is “no.”
3. Transposons don't just randomly invade a genome but insert copies of themselves into very specific places on chromosomes.
4. The best-studied transposons are the "P elements" found in fruit flies. A recent study of P elements published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences appears to have discovered the source of the "highly nonrandom selectivity of P element insertion."[2]
5. What many P insertion sites share in common is an ability to function as starting sites or "origins" for DNA duplication. This association between P elements and the machinery of genome duplication suggested that they can coordinate their movement with DNA replication.[3]
6. Evolutionists have been trying to work transposons into an overall evolutionary scheme of genetic development. They were curious "Does a selfish drive to increase copy number by replication timing influence the evolution of genome organization?"[2]
7. First, transposons target specific sites. If they were truly "selfish," they should show no preference for location.
8. Because transposons serve a very particular purpose, inserting themselves into specific DNA sites for a biologically significant reason, they must have been designed and created.
9. The transposons' copy numbers are controlled and eventually stopped by inherited cellular mechanisms that seem to "understand" exactly what the transposon is doing.
10. If the transposon is selfishly competing with the genome in order to survive and reproduce, as Dawkins described, then why does the transposon interact with its host genome in a cooperative manner that fits like a hand in a glove?
11. Additionally, most genes on earth are plant genes that serve largely selfless roles,[4] and also "jumping genes" (DNA sequences that move from one location on the genome to another) do not exhibit signs of selfishness.
12. Genes do not struggle against one another, but at almost every level have been found to mesh with coordinated, well-planned precision to perform tasks that serve their larger organisms.
13. Such a behavior could only have resulted from deliberate engineering by a superior Designer who designed all the minute details of DNA on the nanoscopic level.
14. This could have been possible only for God.
15. The cell is like a micro-state or -metropolis.
As an ideal perfect state as Ramaraja in India or any peaceful god-loving society or any good working civilization or metropolis is designed by a creator, the cell is created by God.
16. God exists

References
1. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Spradling, A. C., H. J. Bellen and R. A. Hoskins. Drosophila P elements preferentially transpose to
replication origins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online before print September 6, 2011.
3. A "Jumping Gene's" preferred targets may influence genome evolution. Carnegie Institution for Science news release, September 6, 2011.
4. Demick, D.. 2000. The Unselfish Green Gene. Acts & Facts. 29 (7).

The argument of answers to “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins (1)
1. The infinite regress of Dawkins. Dawkins reasons that if God were an explanation for the existence of our complex universe then God would be an even more complex and improbable entity, which moreover would need an even bigger explanation for its existence.
1a. Plantinga notes in his review of the book this argument is so primitive that it would receive a failing grade in a sophomore philosophy class, because Aristotle already refuted “regress ad infinitum” in his “On the motion of animals.” He gives the example of a mouse trying to climb a mountain of grains or sand. It has no solid substrate so it will not get up. If there is no first cause, the chain of further causes and effects has no standing and will not take place.
1b. Infinite regression of finite causes does not answer the question of source; it merely makes the effects more numerous.
1c. Thus, the only philosophically plausible possibility that remains is that the universe was made by an unmade Cause greater than itself.
2. Dawkins discusses the so-called anthropic principle, which states that reality must be such as to produce any phenomenon we now observe, and specifically must be such as to produce humans like us.
3. Dawkins notes that theists claim that the answer is some supernatural action by God which started life on Earth. So his best alternative answer on behalf of all the atheists is – the anthropic principle.
4. Even if for the sake of argument we accept this argument, the anthropic principle is personalized, namely it is able to plan details about creation, create laws, control the process of creation etc. So it seems that the ‘anthropic principle’ is the name of God for atheists. The same God accepted by all religions.
5. On the page 136, Dawkins writes: "The great majority of planets in the universe are ... not suitable for life. ... However small the minority of planets with just the right conditions for life may be, we necessarily have to be on one of that minority, because here we are thinking about it." So, from the premise that life can evolve by itself (i.e. on naturalistic grounds) given the right planet it follows that our planet has had these right conditions. But of course whether life can or can't evolve by itself on *any* planet is the very question under discussion, so here - again - Dawkins begs the question.
6. The fine-tuning of the fundamental physical constants of the universe is also not sufficiently dealt with by Dawkins.
7. If these constants (e.g. the value of the strong force) were even a little off then life as we know it could not evolve, so theists argue that this evidences God's design.
8. Dawkins fails to mention how fine the fine-tuning is: if the combination of physical constants were off only 1 part in 10^100 then life would not have evolved.
9. On the page 145 he again mentions his newly named God, writing: "Once again, the anthropic principle does its explanatory duty".
9a. If something cannot be explained in naturalism the anthropic principle is the one who always does its miraculous duty. This explanation is the last resort.
10. Fine-tuning as nowadays is to an incredible degree. It cannot be ruled out. There is no better explanation for it, then that a designer developed it.
11. Here are three examples of fine-tuning of the galaxy-sun-earth-moon system.
      Gravitational interaction with a moon
- If greater: tidal effects on the oceans, atmosphere, and rotational period would be too severe.
- If less: orbital obliquity changes would cause climatic instabilities; movement of nutrients and life from the oceans to the continents and vice versa would be insufficient; magnetic field would be too weak.
      Jupiter distance
- If greater: too many asteroid and comet collisions would occur on Earth.
- If less: Earth's orbit would become unstable.
      Oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere
- If larger: advanced life functions would proceed too quickly.
- If smaller: advanced life functions would proceed too slowly.
12. Considering all the different points God the Super-intelligent Designer exists.

Argument from the god delusion answered
1. Alister McGrath, a fellow Oxford professor with Richard Dawkins conjointly wife his wife Johanna Collicut McGrath wrote an answer to Dawkins' The God Delusion. Their book is titled "The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine." Alister McGrath, once an atheist himself, earned his doctorate in molecular biophysics. After becoming convinced of God, and converting to Christianity, McGrath went on to study theology. As a trained scientist, respected theologian, and Oxford fellow, McGrath is well-positioned to respond to Dawkins' bold claims.
2. He takes arguments that Dawkin's makes to support HIS theory (there is no God, religion is evil) and tests them against what is known.
3. He finds Dawkin's argument's lacking depth, with several obvious "claims" to be shown as nothing more than simple opinion– faith- based on some belief on judging observations.
4. McGraths' in his book does not refute every one of Dawkins' contentions but rather responds selectively to a few of his points.
4a. Elaborating why faith is not irrational nonsense, as Dawkins contends in many derisive statements, McGraths also addresses Dawkins' improbability argument pointing out, correctly, that 1) complexity is not an argument for improbability and that 2) improbability is not a valid argument for non-existence.
4b. Science and faith are not incompatible, as Dawkins seems to think. According to Dawkins, evolution makes God unnecessary and thus, out. Stephen Jay Gould (America's best known evolutionist who was also an atheist) disagreed, noting the great number of evolutionary biologists who believe in God, in this excerpt from The Rock of Ages cited by the McGraths (page 34): "Either half my colleagues are enormously stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs--and equally compatible with atheism."
4c. Dawkins' description of the evolutionary roots of religion are suspect. He opines that religious impulses have biological roots and are largely psychological in nature. However, McGraths point out that questions of the origin of religion are unsettled in the field of psychology, a field in which Dawkins is not trained and has limited expertise. And Dawkins is definitely not a religion scientist or theologian. He behaves too often like a biology student who wants to teach Martin Luther theology when he speaks about God. And if a theistic or atheistic mind is the result of Random Just So Unexplainable movements of sub-atoms, one is not more probable then the other, nor better or worse than the other.
4d. Dawkins' contention that religion is evil is simplistic, and the evidence he uses is highly selective.
-- on this point McGraths argues that an even stronger case can be made for the benefits of religion historically in the world.
5. McGraths view is that The God Delusion lacks analytical rigor, and instead relies heavily upon rhetoric. As such, Dawkins' book is an atheistic-fundamentalist polemic/ Bible. One of their criticisms is that "One of the most characteristic features of Dawkins's antireligious polemic is to present the pathological as if it were normal, the fringe as if it were the centre, crackpots as if they were mainstream."
5a. The McGraths write that "Dawkins simply offers the atheist equivalent of slick hellfire preaching, substituting turbocharged rhetoric and highly selective manipulation of facts for careful, evidence-based thinking. Curiously, there is surprisingly little scientific analysis in The God Delusion."
6. Are there many fans of Dawkins? According to a survey 40 % nature scientists in the USA believe in a God who resembles the God of Christian belief, and 20 % are agnostics. Of the rest only a few will be followers of Dawkins.
7. Others have written in response to Dawkins' The God Delusion as well, such as David Berlinski's The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, John Cornwell's Darwin's Angel: A Seraphic Response to the God Delusion, and Eric Reitan's Is God A Delusion: A Reply to Religion's Cultured Despisers.
-  The Devil's Delusion - David Berlinski, himself a secular Jew, delivers a biting defense of religious thought. In brief, Berlinski's argument boils down to three main points:
a. there is nothing in science proper that undermines religion (a point that used to be widely recognized and even extolled by writers like SJ Gould),
b. most of the new atheists badly misunderstand even the most rudimentary arguments of theology and are not logically consistent, and finally that
c. much of science has become rather dogmatic, like a new religion.
Berlinski does an excellent job addressing all three of these points, the first of which should be more or less self evident. Claims, for example, that one "should" only believe in physical or visible evidence are not, in and of themselves, empirical claims. Indeed, I have friends who resolutely insist that materialism is "all there is" while remaining blissfully unaware of the fact that such a statement could not arise from strictly empirical observation.
-- Is God A Delusion - Eric Reitan, a Professor of Philosophy at Oklahoma State University, specializes in ethics (especially non-violence theory) and the philosophy of religion, is an award-winning writer and scholar.
a. Reitan argues that the moral attacks made on religion by contemporary atheists, is not an attack on religion but on its corruption.
b. In chapter 9 of his book, Reitan confronts the problem of evil, admitting that, while there are insights to be gained from many of the classical Christian theodicy’s, none has really solved the problem. But he argues, persuasively, that this fact is no more sufficient to make faith in a good God irrational than the fact that biologists have not solved certain problems facing the theory of evolution makes it irrational to continue to believe in that theory.
8. Thus the evolution theory presented by Dawkins as the only true way to look at things is nothing but a new faith trying to explain how nature came into being and how it developed. It is an atheist Bible only and nothing more.
9. Thus, many respected scientists disagree with evolution theory and still accept a Divine Deity as the ultimate cause of all existence we observe.
10. God exists.

The argument of the last possible explanation
1. In his book God Delusion (GD), Richard Dawkins makes arguments in ethics, philosophy, history, and theology but hardly any science.
2. GD claims to show how belief in God is wrong, yet the majority of the book is concerned with the ethical conduct of religion and religion's moral worth, not whether God exists.
3. Dawkins dismisses the arguments of the Intelligent Design movement (ID) as "lazy" and based on ignorance. Invoking a designing intelligence to explain something like the sophisticated bacterial flagellum is a science stopper, namely, to say "God did it" ends scientific explanation.
4. However, Dawkins's critique of Michael Behe's argument based on the flagellum and other biological systems misses the mark.
5. Michael Behe argues that the flagellum is "irreducibly complex." This means that all the approximately forty proteins parts need to be in place for the motor to work at all.
6. The flagellum (and many other biological functions) fails to fit Darwin's demand that evolution be slow and gradual.
7. Dawkins simply affirms that there must be a materialistic explanation for the flagellum. He does note that another biological system--the Type III Secretor System--contains ten of the flagellum's forty parts and announces that this refutes Behe, since this less complex system had to have been an ancestor to the flagellum.
8. This is called the co-option theory, and it is woefully inadequate, since it leaves thirty parts of the flagellum unexplained, as well as the detailed DNA assembly instructions which are required for the flagellum to be put together properly in the correct sequence.
9. Dawkins also errs by saying that Behe's theory claims that none of the approximately forty necessary parts of the flagellum can be found in other working systems. Since ten are found in another system, Behe is refuted.
10. But Behe never made the claim that other parts could not be found in other organisms. Rather, he said that all forty parts of the bacterial flagellum are required for its motor function and that this function could not be built up by Darwinism's "slight, successive variation."
11a. Thus Behe's inference to design is not "lazy" or a “science stopper” nor is it based on ignorance. It is based on vastly increased knowledge of the workings within the cell that has come about in the last several decades.
11b. Theistic science doesn’t stop science. With God we enter the realm of the Unlimited so science is unlimited.
12. If there are no evolutionary explanations for designs and complexities found in different researches and the last possible and reasonable explanation of intelligent design is rejected that is not real science.
13. Therefore, God exists.

The argument of the Ultimate Boeing 747
1. Richard Dawkins in his book God Delusion turns around the famous example of the ‘The Boeing 747’ first used by Fred Hoyle against the probability of life spontaneously assembling itself on the primordial earth.
2. This is the example: “It is improbable that a tornado, sweeping through a junkyard, would ever assemble a working Boeing 747 airliner.”
3. Dawkins tries to say that just as the Boeing 747 is designed and has therefore a designer so also God who shows design had a designer. Briefly in syllogism:
        a. Every existing entity that shows evidence of design requires a designer superior to itself.
        b. God shows evidence of design in himself.
        c. Hence God requires a designer (another God) superior to himself.
4a. Now, here is the argument of Dawkins how it actually works against himself; What is the cause of the Big Bang, the energy movements turning into order, the subatomic particles whirled into structures, the quantum wave function or quantum vacuum. If these have a cause, what is their cause.
4b. Aristotle already defeated this infinite regress. As a mouse cannot climb a hill of grains since there is no basis or support to take off from.
5. Thus the syllogism should be like this:
        a. Every existing entity that shows evidence of design requires a designer superior to itself.
        b. The universe(s) show evidence of design.
        c. Infinite regressions are not possible because then no universes come into existence.
        d. The first cause was an Intelligent Designer.
Infinite regressions are paradoxical to reality, simply not true. Thus the whole argument of Dawkins falls flat because ‘infinite regressions’ are not possible. There would be no first cause and so nothing would happen ever without a first mover and controller, God.
6. God, the first cause of all causes, exists.

The argument of Hume versus Darwin in God Delusion by Dawkins
1. In his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, David Hume (1779) presented a number of objections to the design argument.
2a. In particular, he criticized the argument on the grounds that it depends on a dubious analogy, that it is a flawed inductive argument since it is based on the evidence of a single universe, and that it does not establish the characteristics of the designer.
2b. The universe does reveal the designer’s qualities. But Hume has to learn some basic ABCD. We are spirit souls, imprisoned in a material body. The material world has many prison cells and is thus a big prison. Outside the prison there is a palace and the king. As in Ramaraja the king should be fully rich, powerful, loving, beautiful, knowledgeable etc. These are the qualities of the Ultimate Designer or God, Krishna.
2c. On Hume’s “based on the evidence of a single universe” as mentioned above in 2a we know that for this universe, of this Big Bang, causing 10^23 planets circling as a huge clock, that it is caused by God. Clock works are created and kept going by a clock maker and his design. The other universes work on the same principles.
3a. He also raised the objection that if an explanation is required to account for the order in the universe, an explanation would also be required to account for the order in the mind of the designer. Hume’s character Philo claims that “… a mental world or universe of ideas requires a cause as much as does a material world or universe of objects, and, if similar in its arrangement, must require a similar cause.” (Hume 1779, p. 33)
3b. This argument is already answered by Aristotle. There must be a first cause just as the mouse can’t climb a hill of sand since there is nothing fixed. Without a first cause the chain of causes and effects has no staring point.
4. The Darwinian response to design is not satisfied with the philosophical arguments of Hume, but is only confident in rejecting design when a scientific explanation of the order in question is in place. The philosopher of science Elliott Sober contrasts the two approaches as follows:
     a. “Philosophers who now criticize the organistic design argument often believe that the argument was dealt its death blow by Hume. … the design argument after Hume was merely a corpse that could be propped up and paraded. Hume had taken the life out if it.”
     b. “Biologists often take a different view. For them, Hume’s sceptical attack was not the decisive moment; rather, it was Darwin’s development and confirmation of a substantive scientific explanation of the adaptive features of organisms that really undermined the design argument (at least in its organistic formulation). Philosophers who believe that a theory can’t be rejected until a better theory is developed to take its place often sympathize with this point of view.” (Sober 2004, p. 15)
5. Dawkins espouses the Darwinian response, but in reality he seems to favour Humean responses. In fact, his main argument against design closely follows Hume’s concerning the need for an explanation of the mind of the designer.
6. The arguments of Dawkins against design can be briefly summarized like this:
             Argument 1: Who designed the designer
    a. It is extremely improbable that organized complexity should exist unexplained.
    b. If God exists, he must have organized complexity, the very same property we want to explain, only more so. And so,
    c. God’s organized complexity would be even more in need of explanation than that found in nature. (Or equivalently, according to Dawkins, God is not a good ultimate explanation of organized complexity in nature.)
7. The answer for Dawkins is that the mind of the Designer is eternal and uncreated as Dawkins claims that subatomic particles, the cause of the Big Bang, chance, energy, mass etc. are eternal. The cause of chance, the anthropic principle, evolution drive, natural selection etc. etc in other words, the organizers of the molecules, flora and fauna are also unexplained. Then who is right? Our experience in human society is that only persons, consciousness create or manufacture. Impersonal forces and creators don’t exist.
8. Argument 2: Darwinian argument
    a. The design argument depends on the claim that “nothing that we know looks designed unless it is designed.”
    b. Darwinism explains apparent design in the living world and so shows that the claim noted in point a is false.
    c. Thus the design argument is flawed and hence provides no basis for belief in God.
Dawkins writes:
“Creationist ‘logic’ is always the same. Some natural phenomenon is too statistically improbable, too complex, too beautiful, too awe-inspiring to have come into existence by chance. Design is the only alternative to chance that the authors can imagine. Therefore a designer must have done it. And science’s answer to this faulty logic is always the same. Design is not the only alternative to chance. Natural selection is a better alternative.” (Dawkins 2006, p. 121)
9. Then he must answer: Who is selecting. Why there is selection. Why species came. Why proteins came. Why thunderbolts came. Why a Big Bang happened.
Don’t we see in human society that selection, cross breeding, synthesizing, fireworks, explosions are caused by intelligent design? Isn’t it therefore logical to extrapolate this to Nature. There is no evidence of other designers.
10.  So does Darwinian explanations undermine the design theory of organized complexity?
Setting aside the Humean arguments for the moment, we are left only with two possibilities to explain organized complexity, design or Darwinism. Anyone of the two if true will exclude the other.
11. Analyzing Darwinian arguments. Given the laws of physics and the initial state of the early universe, does Darwinism give a sufficiently good account of organized complexity to make design unnecessary? It is not at all obvious that it does. There are a number of hurdles that suggest the probability of complex life arising in the universe is very low even when Darwinism is taken into account.
12. Even Dawkins acknowledges that certain steps in the development of complex life are statistically improbable. He refers to the “initial stroke of luck” in the origin of life and goes on to say that “it may be that the origin of life is not the only major gap in the evolutionary story that is bridged by sheer luck, anthropically justified.”
13. He mentions two more obstacles:
   a. Mark Ridley … has suggested that the origin of the eukaryotic cell … was an even more momentous, difficult and statistically improbable step than the origin of life.
   b. The origin of consciousness might be another major gap whose bridging was the same order of improbability. (Dawkins 2006, p. 140)
14. Darwinism cannot undermine design in the context of fine-tuning, for example, without giving an explanation of fine-tuning.
15. It is instructive to consider Dawkins’ response to the fine-tuning argument. Dawkins also appeals to a multiverse to account for fine-tuning and addresses the claim that this is no more satisfactory than design as follows:
“People who think that have not had their consciousness raised by natural selection. The key difference between the genuinely extravagant God hypothesis and the apparently extravagant multiverse hypothesis is one of statistical improbability. The multiverse, for all that it is extravagant, is simple. God, or any intelligent, decision-taking, calculating agent, would have to be highly improbable in the very same statistical sense as the entities he is supposed to explain.” (Dawkins 2006, pp. 146-147).
16. Here Dawkins appeals to natural selection as a consciousness-raiser, but he is not content to rest his case on the Darwinian response. He appears not to be entirely convinced of the alternative multiverse explanation in this case, but nevertheless thinks it is to be preferred to design. Dawkins has reverted to his Humean arguments by claiming that God is too improbable to be a satisfactory explanation. But Big Bang, natural selection, chance and so on are impossible as agents for creation. There is no proof. But humans make plastic Christmas trees, artificial flowers, plastic apples or fruits, window dummies, robots, planetaria. These are never made by a pile of plastic or metal molecules under nature’s open sky.
17. Analyzing Humean arguments
The Humean arguments used by Dawkins are not scientific but philosophical in nature. He writes: “It is extremely improbable that organized complexity should exist unexplained”.
18. Dawkins wants to say that to prove the existence of God it would be necessary to explain His complexity. The argument from improbability states that complex things could not have come about by chance. (Dawkins 2006, p. 114) From this statement and the claim that God possesses organized complexity, it only follows that God is highly unlikely to have arisen by chance.
19. This argument is missing out an important fact of the nature of spirit and matter namely, that spirit, as opposed to the nature of matter, is eternal, what means it has neither beginning nor end. God is not created.
20. Further, explanations of God’s nature and complexity do actually exist in the Vedas. He is hardly comparable to anything material in our experience.
21. The necessity of God as the first cause cannot be really argued; without Him nothing would happen ever. He is the first and eternal existence and the mover of all inanimate objects, to begin with, the ingredients for creation, just like for example without a driver and the locomotive all the wagons of a train pushed by a locomotive would not get anywhere.
22. The premise of Dawkins is: If God exists, he must have organized complexity, the very same property we want to explain, only more so.
23. On this he writes:
“A God capable of continuously monitoring and controlling the individual status of every particle in the universe cannot be simple.” (Dawkins 2006, p. 149)
“God may not have a brain made of neurons, or a CPU made of silicon, but if he has the powers attributed to him he must have something far more elaborately and non-randomly constructed than the largest brain or the largest computer we know.” (Dawkins 2006, p. 154)
24. This description is in agreement with the Vedic view. All ideas of other complexities and order outside of Him are born from His mind, intelligence and consciousness. Nothing that any living being has made was created without mind, intelligence, consciousness. So only God can create complex molecules, universes, planets, which humans nor nature can make.
25. Dawkins has provided no good reasons for stating that God would have the kind of organized created complexity found in the natural world. God’s complexity is irreducible, spiritual and an eternal state. Both his Humean and Darwinian arguments are a failure. He is in delusion about God.
26. God exists, beyond the material deluding energy.

The argument of The Grand Design – a book by Hawking:
`New Answers to the Ultimate Questions of life.'
1. On page 10 Hawking writes: "This is the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything. We shall attempt to answer it in this book."
2. Surprisingly, on page 171 Hawking tells us: "The laws of nature tell us `how' the universe behaves, but they don't answer the `why?' questions that we posed at the start of this book."
3a. If science cannot provide the ultimate answers, and if `philosophy is dead' as he opines, what other discipline does Hawking know of, which will explain the ultimate questions?
3b. That "philosophy is dead" is a foolish, ignorant statement. So, the logic goes as follows: because philosophy's traditional explanations of the physical world have been superseded by physics, all of philosophy is dead. But this obviously makes no sense. Nothing in modern physics replaces philosophical theories of ethics or political philosophy. Or, for that matter, nothing in modern physics makes superfluous the methodological discussions of the philosophy of science. In fact, much of his book is really not a work of popular physics, but rather an argument for a particular philosophical approach to theoretical physics, which Hawking didn’t manage to proof.
4. There are some other fundamental failures in Hawking's book.
5. Something from nothing?
Quote (p.8): "M-theory (see footnote 1) predicts that a great many universes were created out of nothing. Their creation does not require the intervention of some supernatural being or god. Rather these multiple universes arise naturally from physical law. They are a prediction of science."
5a. Where does this physical law come from- who made the law. Where is the `science' that predicts universes emerging from nothing? Have you ever seen “laws” doing something. The law ”Red light means stop” is made by the government, they put up the system of roads and traffic lights, it is taught by teachers in school etc. to be followed, and there are camera’s, police, and a ministry of justice to enforce it.
6. Hawking writes: On page 136: "On this view the universe appeared spontaneously, starting in every possible way."
On Page 137, the caption to an illustration: "Multiverse Quantum fluctuations lead to the creation of tiny universes out of nothing."
On Page 180: "Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing in the manner described in chapter 6 - Choosing Our Universe...
Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."
6a. We answer: Hawking has said absolutely nothing that proves that "the universe can and will create itself from nothing.” To say that something comes out of nothing, that there is no material cause is simply a statement of faith and doesn’t meet the needs of science and philosophy. Nor is there a need for science; things just happen, anything can happen. Total, Absolute Anarchy on all levels is the only law, even now. No need to describe or fix anything, everything can change any moment.
Even in society or personal relations; the particles can start doing anything, causing love or hate or anything. There is no rule, responsibility, morality and shelter. THIS IS NOT SO; "Multiple Quantum fluctuations” in the soup on my stove are caused by the cook.
6b. The Eastern Wisdom further replies, "If it is the nature of reality that something arises from nothing, then this process should be visible today. But we see that all effects have a material cause. And, if something can come out of nothing, then it would logically follow that anything could come out of anything -- a human being could hatch from a hen's egg or a woman could give birth to a chicken. But we observe that creation follows the rule known in Vedic logic as satkaryavada: like cause, like effect. By this rule, nothing must come from nothing, and something specific must come from something specific.”
7. Who and what and why are we?
Hawking dismisses any possibility that mankind is "More than Matter." On page 181, in the last paragraph of the book, Hawking says: "We human beings ... are ourselves mere collections of fundamental particles of nature."
7a. We reply: Dr. Michael Sabom, a cardiologist at the Emory University Medical School, undertook a scientific study of out-of-body and near-death experiences. The results of his study detailed in his book Recollections of Death: A Medical Investigation (1982), convinced him of the reality of out-of-body experiences. He concluded that the mind was an entity distinct from the brain and that the near-death crisis caused the mind and brain to split apart for a brief time. Sabom wrote, "Could the mind which splits apart from the physical brain be, in essence, the soul, which continues to exist after the final bodily death, according to some religious doctrines? As I see it, this is the ultimate question that has been raised by reports of the NDE [near-death experience]."
7b. All organisms are alive only because of the soul dwelling within it. Occurrences documented by medical practitioners suggest its validity. In his book Light and Death, cardiologist Dr. Michael Sabom reports the surgery of Pam Reynolds, a patient suffering from an aneurysm (a sack-like widening of an artery) in her brain stem that was on the verge of rupture, which could be fatal. Since the aneurysm was at the base of Pam's brain, her surgeon, Dr. Robert Spetzler, director of Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Arizona, had to drain all the blood from her brain to flatten the brainwaves and stop her heartbeat and breathing. Pam was clinically dead during the surgery. After the successful operation, however, she could recollect exact conversations among the surgeons and accurate descriptions of medical instruments (only uncovered after the patient is anaesthetized) used in her surgery, during which she was supposed to be unconscious. During the operation, Pam could see her body from above; she was floating outside her body, so to speak. This and several other documented near-death and out-of-body accounts suggest the existence of the soul, the spirit particle, as a metaphysical being that is the actual source of consciousness.
7c. Quantum theory scientists speak about observer. This is also described in the Srimad Bhagavatam 7.7.22: "The Lord's eight separated material energies, the three modes of material nature and the sixteen transformations [the eleven senses and the five gross material elements like earth and water]—within all these, the one spiritual soul exists as the observer."
We cannot speak about an observer of the body if the observer is not beyond the material dimension and is having consciousness. Knowing of the reincarnation of such a conscious observer it can be concluded that its quality is superior to the material elements because it continues to exist even after the death and destruction of the material body. This is the description of the soul that reincarnates life after life accepting different material bodies as proven by the research of Ian Stevenson who examined more than 3000 cases of children who remembered their past life's activities, where they lived etc.
7d. It is only because of the influence of the soul that a material body can grow. "From the spirit soul, the material energy comes out. Take for example one lemon tree. It is a living entity, and it is producing many gallons of citric acid from the lemons. You take fifty lemons today, again you can take fifty lemons tomorrow, and if you extract the lemons, you'll find a big quantity of citric acid. Wherefrom the citric acid chemicals come? Because the soul is there in the tree. Therefore the conclusion should be that the chemicals come from life; life does not come from chemical.”
7e. That we are only mere collections of fundamental particles of nature and nothing else cannot be accepted as a verified, good standing theory, rather it is just a totally unfounded declaration of faith in materialism which, like `self-creation out of nothing', Hawking cannot support by any proof. He has to show that from a field of fundamental particles, without external forces, just as in the initial state of the cosmos, a crowd of people can come.
8. What of free will?
Stephen Hawking, insists that human beings are biological robots with no consciousness, no free will, no minds and no spirit. On pages 32/33 (repeated on page 178) he makes the astonishing claim that human beings have no free will:
"It is hard to imagine how free will can operate if our behaviour is determined by physical law, so it seems that we are no more than biological machines and that free will is just an illusion" (p. 32).
8a. Not only Hawking but other scientists are pushing this idea that feelings and thoughts are mere "biological ricochets" of brain chemistry, lacking any spirit, intention or consciousness.
8b. The statement that there is no free will is a wrong theory since everybody's experience is to be the witness/ spectator/observer of the body, mind, consciousness and the content of these. One sees desires, feelings, thoughts coming and being transcendental visionary of these, one can decide to flow/go along or resist and do something else. And, all living beings are making choices every moment of their life and to choose between a, b, c or d is free will. For example, someone is sitting reading. If he likes, he can get up and go away, do something else. That's his free will. There is free will.
8c. For Hawking, humans are inescapably governed, "we would need a knowledge of the initial state of each of the thousand trillion trillion molecules in the human body and to solve something like that number of [mathematical] equations. That would take a few billion years ... [but] because it is so impractical to use the underlying physical laws to predict human behaviour, we adopt what is called an effective theory, based on the notion of free will plus the assumption that people evaluate their possible alternative courses of action and choose the best.”
This is similar to the ARGUMENT FROM PRIMATE STENOGRAPHY
Take the obvious order one sees in the works of William Shakespeare, or of Sir Hawking.
No rational person's response to seeing the works of Shakespeare or Hawking would be something like: "Oh, there must be a lot of monkeys somewhere who typed all this by pure dumb luck."
Obviously, then, the order in the universe didn’t come about in a way similar to this. A rational person knows that the order in the universe came from an intelligent creator, not that it came about by accident.
The agents of the forces of Big Bang and evolution, namely “Chance”, “Generation”, “Miracle Doing of the Grand Void” need Someone to Orchestrate, an Administrator, Operator, Someone pushing the processes so that the cosmic order comes about.
Another feeling arising here from The Original Quantum Oscillations is that Hawking by his own words is some package of particles or evolved monkey. The Indescribable Unpredictable Void has decided to bring out a godly delusion– what is the value, anything could have come out-. The Darkness may change some atoms in him and turn him into an angel. Who can feel offended from this comparison, that feeling offended is just some atoms and it was not the nonexistent free will of the writer to state this; The Only Cause was The Supreme Quantum Field doing as It pleases.
8d. The masters of Vedic wisdom have also told that we are not as free as we think ourselves to be. Association with matter influences the consciousness in such a way that our behaviour becomes habitual, automatic or reactionary—even though we each think that we act according to our own free will. The modes, or gunas, or as Hawking calls them, the physical laws, influence the behaviour of people. According to their association with the modes of nature they become conditioned to a particular way of understanding and thinking. The freedom of the soul is only in the human form of life, for one who has spiritual knowledge; then one can choose under which modes one wants to function.
9. As there are laws in the government, made by lawmakers, so the material laws of nature were made by a person, God, who moved the quantum particles to build the material world.
10. God exists.

Notes:
1. M-theory is a theory in physics that unifies all consistent versions of superstring theory that attempts to explain all of the particles and fundamental forces of nature in one theory by modelling them as vibrations of tiny super-symmetric strings.

The Argument from Design
Or The Classical Teleological Argument
1. Whenever there are things that cohere only because of a purpose or function (for example, all the complicated parts of a watch that allow it to keep time), we know that they had a designer who de- signed them with the function in mind; they are too improbable to have arisen by random physical processes. (A hurricane blowing through a hardware store could not assemble a watch.)
2. Organs of living things, such as the eye and the heart, cohere only because they have a function (for example, the eye has a cornea, lens, retina, iris, eyelids, and so on, which are found in the same organ only because together they make it possible for the animal to see).
3. These organs must have a designer who designed them with their function in mind: just as a watch implies a watchmaker, an eye implies an eye-maker (from 1 and 2).
4a. These things have not had a human designer.
4b. Some may argue that proto forms replicated themselves but to replicate is to design. The first one to replicate needs an eternal designer– the soul or super-soul, god. Alternatively, there must be a first one to replicate– that is God. In other words, if there is a system which replicates that begs the question, because how that system came into being? Just by itself? In nowadays genetics it is very well known how complex is the replication system and even one small part taken away from a replication system will result in failure of the system. Only an intelligent being could create such a complex replication system and not dull matter without thinking, feeling, willing.
5. Therefore, these things must have had a non-human designer (from 3 and 4).
6. God is the non-human designer (from 5). God the creator of the primeval replications system exists.
7. God exists.

The Argument from the Paucity of Benign Mutations.
1. Evolution is powered by random mutations and natural selection.
2. Organisms are complex, improbable systems, and by the laws of probability any change is astronomically more likely to be for the worse than for the better.
3. The majority of mutations would be deadly for the organism (from 2).
4. The amount of time it would take for all the benign mutations needed for the assembly of an organ to appear by chance is preposterously (contrary to reason, absurd, outrageous) long (from 3).
5. In order for evolution to work, something outside of evolution had to bias the process of mutation, increasing the number of benign ones (from 4).
6. Something outside of the mechanism of biological change—the First to Mutate—must bias the process of mutations for evolution to work (from 5).
7. The only entity that is both powerful enough and purposeful enough to be the First to Mutate is God.
7a. Darwinists theorize that mutations can have small effects (tissue that is slightly more transparent, or cells that are slightly more sensitive to light), and mutations contributing to these effects can accumulate over time; that the necessary mutations do not have to have occurred one after another in a single line of descendants, but could have appeared independently in thousands of separate organisms, each mutating at random, and the necessary combinations could come together as the organisms met and exchanged genes; life on Earth has had a vast amount of time to accumulate the necessary mutations.
7b. We counter that you cannot show anything within your experience which has come about by chance. You cannot find anything by chance.
8. One can try to counter, “so many things in nature are by chance.”
8a. We answer “not yet, go to nature – you don’t understand Her powers.”
Just analyze all the human/animal/plant artefacts, and then we must conclude that this chance theory is simply foolish.
9. What about gambling? Somebody wins, somebody looses.
9a. We answer “that is not chance.”
You don’t know which forces give our muscles the exact power to loose or win as we don’t control our digestion, heart beat, immune system, brain processes.
But these are exactly controlled as are the processes in our computers, factories, medical machines, cars, heating systems, airplanes.
You don’t know therefore you say “chance” and want to cover your ignorance by this chance theory. You want to become very intelligent by chance.
10. Wherefrom the brain come? Materialistic scientists will say it has evolved.
10a. Then we answer: “you prepare a brain or keep something that by chance there will be a brain.”
Great scientists like Einstein, Newton, Chandra Bose had such great brains but who has created their brain.
Even that big man cannot create such brain. The big scientist, before dying, he should have considered, “now I will die soon. Let me create another brain and body like me and that will work.” That they cannot do.
So there must be a second man, a second brain who has created the brains.
Evolutionists say: “Nature is doing”, so nature means superior control. We say that nature is working under the superintendence of God. E.g. the sun, the moon, the seasonal changes are some of the parts and parcels of nature's working. So many things, nature is working very systematically. The summer season will appear exactly in the month of June and July. The fall begins in September every year. One can foretell that "Next September this will happen," because nature's routine is very fixed up. So this systematic work of nature, how it is possible if there is no supervision?
You have to accept there is superior administration. You may not know who is administrating, but you have to accept that there is some brain, that is the brain of God.
10b. A scientist may argue “In the test tube we have made some tissues, and the tissues are sustaining themselves and are living. So in due course, they’ll be able to create some functioning brain.”
10c. We answer “that proves that in nature a scientist created the brain and body.”
11. Another example defying chance: Cows are eating dry grass and giving you nice milk. There are no such vitamins in grass which produce milk when a human mother eats them. Rather she will die. So who made this arrangement?
12. Another example. One process of protein synthesis in science is called “The magic factor.”
12a. We comment. Magic is also chance. That must have been the God factor. And the scientists originating and steering the process of synthesis proofs that the proteins in nature are also synthesized by a scientist.
13. One more. There is a coconut tree, the hard nut and water. There must be pipe, pumping, the material in the right shape and water which nature and the master of nature arranged. You do something that water comes in the coconut up there or make such coconut root, tree and fruit.
14. The atheist argues “God to fill up the gaps”.
14a. No, we can proof that in human society nothing was done by chance. For a child there are gaps but an educated person knows that all dead matter is moved by human masters. A child may see a car driving.
and think “automatic”. Similarly, dead matter of nature is moved by the Master Scientist, God.
15. As the scientist of our human world invents and operates from his office but enjoys at home, so, God immanent created and controls the material energy but enjoys in heaven as God transcendent.
16. God and heaven exists.

The Argument of the Original Replicator
1. Evolution is the process by which an organism evolves from simpler ancestors.
2. Evolution by itself cannot explain how the original ancestor—the first living thing—came into existence (from 1).
3. The theory of natural selection can deal with this problem only by saying that the first living thing evolved out of non-living matter (from 2).
4. That original non-living matter (call it the Original Replicator) must be capable of:
(a) self-replication,
(b) generating a functioning mechanism out of surrounding matter to protect itself against falling apart, and
(c) surviving slight mutations to itself that will then result in slightly different replicators.
5. The Original Replicator is complex (from 4).
6. The Original Replicator is too complex to have arisen from purely physical processes (from 5 and The Classical Teleological Argument). For example, DNA, which currently carries the replicated design of organisms, cannot be the Original Replicator, because DNA molecules require a complex system of proteins to remain stable and to replicate, and could not have arisen from natural processes before complex life existed.
7. Natural selection cannot explain the complexity of the Original Replicator (from 3 and 6).
8. The Original Replicator must have been created rather than have evolved (from 7 and The Classical Teleological Argument). Biologists and chemists have a theory with many ‘maybe’ which not everyone accepts as conclusive saying that it is theoretically possible for a simple physical system to make exact copies of itself from surrounding materials. Since then they have identified a number of naturally occurring molecules and crystals that can replicate in ways that could lead to natural selection (in particular, that allow random variations to be preserved in the copies). Once a molecule replicates, the process of natural selection can start creating, and the replicator can accumulate matter and become more complex, eventually leading to precursors of the replication system used by living organisms today. All these steps are not yet copied or performed in the laboratories, but Nature has better scientists and has already done it, as we can see around us. One step was done; scientists performed an experiment where they used amino acids, water and electricity. They created a one celled being which had life in it. It moved like an amoeba. In another, the Urey-Miller experiment they used water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2). The chemicals were all sealed inside a sterile array of glass flasks and flasks connected in a loop, with one flask half-full of liquid water and another flask containing a pair of electrodes. The liquid water was heated to induce evaporation, sparks were fired between the electrodes to simulate lightning through the atmosphere and water vapour, and then the atmosphere was cooled again so that the water could condense and trickle back into the first flask in a continuous cycle.
Within a day, the mixture had turned pink in colour, and at the end of two weeks of continuous operation, Miller and Urey observed that as much as 10–15% of the carbon within the system was now in the form of organic compounds. Two percent of the carbon had formed amino acids that are used to make proteins in living cells, with glycine as the most abundant. Sugars were also formed. Nucleic acids were not formed within the reaction. 18% of the methane molecules became bio-molecules. The rest turned into hydrocarbons like bitumen.
In an interview, Stanley Miller stated: "Just turning on the spark in a basic pre-biotic experiment will yield 11 out of 20 amino acids."
After Miller's death in 2007, scientists examining sealed vials preserved from the original experiments were able to show that there were actually well over 20 different amino acids produced in Miller's original experiments. That is considerably more than what Miller originally reported, and more than the 20 that naturally occur in life. Moreover, some evidence suggests that Earth's original atmosphere might have had a different composition from the gas used in the Miller–Urey experiment. There is abundant evidence of major volcanic eruptions 4 billion years ago, which would have released carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), hydrogen sulphide (H2S), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere. Experiments using these gases in addition to the ones in the original Miller–Urey experiment have produced more diverse molecules. This all proves that in nature also a scientist worked with lightning, volcanic eruptions etc to make the amino acids and amoeba.
9. What actually happened with the production of the amoeba is that there were the life conditions, the conditions conducive to life, so therefore life or non-material soul or consciousness came, but not that this soul was produced by chemical combination. Life is different from the amino acids, water and electricity. This argument in Sanskrit is called, tandula-vrscika-nyaya. You have no experience here. In India they have got experience. Sometimes from a heap of rice, one scorpion is coming out. So foolish men, they will think that the heap of rice, piles of rice, is giving birth to a scorpion. No, that is not the fact. One should know the scorpion. This animal is very clever. They lay down eggs within the heaps of rice, and by the fermentation of the rice, it comes out. So actually, rice is not producing the scorpion. It is coming out under some chemical fermentation process.
10. Nature is an instrument thus there must be an operator, just like the child is thinking the motor car is going automatically. He doesn’t know there is a driver. The child sees the airplane is flying. There is a pilot, he doesn’t know. He thinks it is automatically going. Without operator a machine cannot work.
11. Scientists claim that nature is going on as a biochemical reaction. But they cannot produce it by biochemical combination. And if they can do something they proof that in nature also scientists are at work doing it very systematically and successfully. As scientists are trying to do it, it is being already done by another person.
12. Scientists talk of accident theory. But this flower is not growing in this tree by accident. Accident means there is no law. One cannot argue. By accident some system of laws arose and from then on this flower is always with this tree. If the supreme cause is accident then at any moment accidents may have happened.
13. Or they say from a common ancestor (now extinct), monkey and man came. But why the ancestors of this common ancestor now don’t give common ancestors, monkeys and men. They could answer “we can make crossbreed.” But then they are the cause of this crossbreeding. It is not accident, you are making arrangement, therefore there is a cause.
14. Materialistic scientists reason that *nature* is bringing the subatomic particles into gasses, planets, flora, fauna, humans.
15. That means nature is above the scientists. Then they should worship nature and be submissive. They are submissive already, nature is pulling them, forcing disease, old age and death, weather, comets, time. Thus nature is stronger than them.
16. As soon as you are dependant, you must have to accept God. You may not know who is God and what is God, but somebody is controlling you and your activities, He is God.
17. Where you get the idea that from matter life is possible. Evolutionist: "In the future we will do it." But in the original condition you show something. Just like formerly they were flying balloons. So because they were flying, they could say that "in the future we shall fly a big city– a Boeing 747." And in the history we can see that that is not impossible, because in the beginning condition or initiative condition we see that big things can be flown. But here and now you cannot even prepare an ant. You have not been able to prepare even a small ant, germ. Show me. So why do you say, "In future I shall do it"?
18.  Anything that was created requires a Creator.
19.  God exists.

The argument from miracles of atheism
1. All matter in the universe appeared from nothing.
2. All matter in the universe being compressed in an area the size of a period on this page.
3. An explosion creating order instead of chaos.
4. Laws coming from nothing to create order.
5. Claiming gravity happens naturally when they don’t even know what gravity is or what causes it.
6. Life comes from lifeless matter.
7. Evolution is true even though less than 1% is observable from a single cell life to all that we see.
8. All these tenets of science are rather in the category of miracles than in the category of proven theories by experiments. They only see the effects but have no understanding of their cause. That means ignorance.
Therefore, including God in the above explanations is the best possible option to properly understand things like e.g. that life can come only from life or that evolution is not true because it is neither observed nor proven by experiment.
9. God exists.

The argument of the true evidence of supernatural abilities
1. Miraculous Anomalies for atheistic science fall into three general categories:
a. Extrasensory perception, which refers to the ability to gather information that is beyond the normal reach of the senses, is the first and perhaps most popular form of parapsychology. ESP, as it is also called, is a concept that includes telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition.
b. Psycho kinesis, also referred to as PK, is the second category often associated with parapsychology. This is when an individual is able to directly interact with physical objects through mental powers, whether by moving such objects with one’s mind or otherwise engaging them in subtle ways.
c. The study of the self as surviving bodily death, including near-death experiences, apparitions, and reincarnation.
2. The book 'Dream Telepathy: Experiments in Nocturnal Extrasensory Perception' (Studies in Consciousness) tells about experiments at Brooklyn's Maimonides Medical Center where mind-to-mind communication was put to the test. The many anecdotes and examples are fascinating in their own right and demonstrate how science can examine unusual real-life experiences using both rigor and imagination.
-- In his book 'The Reality of ESP: A Physicist's Proof of Psychic Abilities' Russel Targ mentions the following true story:
"On February 4, 1974, members of the Symbionese Liberation Army kidnapped nineteen-year-old newspaper heiress Patricia Hearst from her Berkeley, California apartment. Desperate to find her, the police called physicist Russell Targ and Pat Price, a psychic retired police commissioner. As Price turned the pages of the police mug book filled with hundreds of photos, suddenly he pointed to one of them and announced, “That’s the ringleader.” The man was Donald DeFreeze, who was indeed subsequently so identified. Price also described the type and location of the kidnap car, enabling the police to find it within minutes."
   As a scientist, Targ demands proof. His experience is based on two decades of investigations at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which he cofounded with physicist Harold Puthoff in 1972. This twenty-million dollar program launched during the Cold War was supported by the CIA, NASA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Army and Air Force Intelligence. The experiments they conducted routinely presented results could have happened by chance less than once in a million. Targ describes four types of experiments:
a. Remote Viewing, in which a person describes places and events independent of space and time. For example, while in California Price drew to scale a Soviet weapons factory at Semipalitinsk with great accuracy later confirmed by Satellite photography. In another remote viewing, Targ accurately sketched an airport in San Andreas, Columbia himself.
b. Distant Mental Influence, where the thoughts of the experimenter can positively or negatively affect the physiology (heart rate, skin resistance, etc.) of a distant person.
c. Whole field isolation, where someone in a state of sensory isolation accurately describes the visual experiences of someone else in another place.
d. Precognition and retro causality, showing that the future can affect the past. That is, the elephant you see on television in the morning can be the cause of your having dreamed about elephants the previous night.
   Final chapters present evidence for survival after death; explain how ESP works based on the Buddhist/Hindu view of our selves as non-local, eternal awareness; discuss the ethics of exercising psychic abilities, and show us how to explore ESP ourselves. “I am convinced,” Targ says, “that most people can learn to move from their ordinary mind to one not obstructed by conventional barriers of space and time. Who would not want to try that?”
3. About the book 'Supernormal: Science, Yoga, and the Evidence for Extraordinary Psychic Abilities' David E. Presti from the University of California, Berkeley writes:
"Dean Radin is a modern-day Galileo of psychical research.  He is an impeccable scholar and premier experimental scientist, and this is a terrific book.  Come, look through his telescope; with great clarity, he goes right to the core of the most profound issues in the contemporary science of mind.  By including a detailed review of a variety of experimental findings, this book presents in one easily accessible place a wealth of information, creating a valuable reference and teaching/learning resource for students and scholars alike.  And by connecting all this with contemplative investigations of the nature of mind carried out over the course of millennia, this book makes an invaluable contribution to expanding the modern dialogue between science and the contemplative traditions."
4. These and many other works of many university researchers prove that supernatural abilities do exist.
5. The meaning of SUPERNATURAL as per Merriam Webster dictionary is 'departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature.' I.o.w that thing what does not exist in nature or subject to explanation according to natural laws.
6. The supernatural abilities of all tested people under strict circumstances for scientific experiments, had to be acquired from outside gross matter.
7. The source of the abilities has to be a conscious being who understands the wish of people for certain ability. And ‘first deserve then desire;’ these developed from many previous births.
8. Because there are perfect, more perfect and most perfect people with various supernatural abilities the source and cause of their different degrees of perfection have to have the greatest perfection.
9. This is the description of God the possessor of all mystic perfection in the highest degree.
10. God exists.

The argument of paranormal abilities or mystic perfections
1. There is no scientific explanation for "psychic powers."
2. The atheists say: 'There may be explained by science later on in the future.'
3. But we say NO because psychic powers like extrasensory perceptions are supernatural, defying all physical laws.
4. Parapsychologist researchers gave the following list of psychic abilities:
- Apportation - Materialization, disappearance or teleportation of an object.[1]
- Aura reading - Perception of energy fields surrounding people, places and things.[2]
- Automatic writing - Writing produced without conscious thought.[3]
- Astral projection or mental projection - An out-of-body experience in which an astral body becomes separate from the physical body.[4]
- Bilocation or multilocation - Being in multiple places at the same time.[5]
- Clairvoyance or second sight - Perception outside the known human senses.[2]
- Death-warning - A vision of a living person prior to his or her death.[6]
- Divination - Gaining insight into a situation, most commonly through a ritual[7]
- Dowsing - Ability to locate objects, sometimes using a tool called a dowsing rod.[8]
- Energy medicine - Healing by channelling a form of energy.[9]
- Faith healing - Diagnosing or curing diseases using religious devotion.[10]
- Levitation - Bodily levitation and flying.[11]
- Medium ship or channelling - Communicating with spirits.[12]
- Precognition, premonition and precognitive dreams - Perception of events before they happen.[13]
- Psychic surgery - Removal of diseased body tissue via an incision that heals immediately afterwards.[14]
- Psycho kinesis or telekinesis - The ability to manipulate matter by the power of thought.[15]
- Psychometry or psychos copy - Obtaining information about a person or object, usually by touching or concentrating on the object or a related object.[16]
- Pyrokinesis - Manipulation of fire.[17]
- Remote viewing - Gathering of information at a distance.[18]
- Retro cognition or post-cognition - Perception of past events.[19]
- Scrying - Use of an item to view events at a distance or in the future.[20]
- Telepathy - Transfer of thoughts or emotions in either direction.[21]
5a. Here are some examples of people with Psychihc abilities:
- Dougall Fraser who self-titled himself as "Queer Guy with a Third Eye," knew from a very young age that he had psychic abilities. He saw the world differently and told people what he saw. By the age of 8 he had already given his first reading. His dead-on predictions have had him named "Best Psychic in Dallas" in 1999.
- Sylvia Browne is arguably the most well-known "celebrity psychic," who has been the most prominent psychic reader in the United States. Her latest addition to her organization is the Sylvia Browne Hypnosis Training Center, a school for anyone who wants to help heal people through proven therapeutic hypnosis methods. She became world-famous psychic and performed spiritual readings for over 50,000 people in nearly 30 countries.
- Danielle Egnew is proficient in many forms of psychic practice, including: clairvoyance, clairsentience, channelling, psychometry, telemetry, medium ship and paranormal investigation. Egnew is also a licensed Christian minister, and she has stated that her clairvoyant abilities come from angelic entities and guides. She has done work as a creative consultant for paranormal TV shows produced by major Hollywood and Fortune 500 studios, and she co-founded the Western Pacific Paranormal Alliance.
- John Edward is an internationally known psychic medium who specializes in speaking to the spirits of the dearly departed. His work has helped thousands of people over the years to find peace and closure around the deaths of those they love. While some argue that John Edward simply uses the mentalist techniques of cold and hot reading to get a sense for his clients' and viewers' pasts, many swear by his uncanny abilities to speak with their loved ones who passed on and to ascertain details that could never have been known without the gift of psychic sight.
5b. The three mystic abilities by which one transforms one's own body are anima, the mystic ability to make oneself smaller than the smallest and thus able to enter within anything. The Supreme Personality of Godhead is within the atoms and atomic particles, and one who perfectly fixes his mind in that subtle atomic form of the Lord acquires the mystic potency called anima, by which one can enter within even the most dense matter such as stone or pass through any obstacle; mahima, becoming greater than the greatest, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is qualitatively not different from His creation and thus a yogi may meditate upon the total material existence as a manifestation of the external potency of the Lord. Once the yogi has established his realization that the material creation is not different from the Lord, he obtains the perfection called mahima-siddhi. By realizing the Lord's presence in each individual element the yogi also acquires the greatness of each element, thus through mahima-siddhi one becomes so great that one covers everything.
Laghima, becoming lighter than the lightest. Kala, or time, is the transcendental form of the Lord that moves the material world. Since the five gross elements are composed of atoms, the atomic particles are the subtle substance or manifestation of the movements of time. More subtle than time is the Personality of Godhead Himself, who expands His potency as the time factor. By understanding all these things clearly the yogi obtains laghima-siddhi, or the power to make himself lighter than the lightest.
One becomes so light that one can ride on the sun's rays into the sun planet.
Through the perfection of prapti one acquires whatever one desires, and through prakamya-siddhi one experiences any enjoyable object, either in this world or the next. Through isita-siddhi one can manipulate the sub potencies of maya, and through the controlling potency called vasita-siddhi one is unimpeded by the three modes of nature. One who has acquired kamavasayita-siddhi can obtain anything from anywhere, to the highest possible limit. Through prapti-siddhi one can acquire anything from anywhere and can even touch the moon with one's finger. By this mystic perfection one can also enter into the senses of any other living entity through the predominating deities of the particular senses; and by thus utilizing the senses of others, one can acquire anything. By fixed meditation on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is the soul of the mahat-tattva, one can achieve the most excellent perfection called prakamya. Avyakta-janmanah indicates that the Supreme Personality of Godhead appears from the avyakta, or the spiritual sky, or that His birth is avyakta, beyond the perception of material senses. Unless one accepts the transcendental form of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, there is no possibility of obtaining prakamya or any other genuine mystic perfection; one gets an inferior reflection. Through prakamya one can experience any enjoyable object, either in this world or the next, and through isita, or the controlling potency, one can manipulate the sub-potencies of maya, which are material. In other words, even by acquiring mystic powers one cannot pass beyond the control of illusion; however, one may manipulate the sub-potencies of illusion. One can obtain the mystic opulence vasita, or freedom from the modes of nature, by meditating upon the Lord as turiya, the fourth factor beyond those modes. Through vasita, or the power to control, one can bring others under one's dominion or keep oneself beyond the control of the three modes of nature. Ultimately, one acquires through kamavasayita the maximum powers of control, acquisition and enjoyment.
Autpattikah indicates being original, natural and unexcelled. These eight mystic potencies originally exist in the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krishna, in the superlative degree. Lord Krishna becomes so small that He enters within the atomic particles, and He becomes so large that as Maha-vishnu He breathes out millions of universes. The Lord can become so light or subtle that even great mystic yogis cannot perceive Him, and the Lord's acquisitive power is perfect, because He keeps the total existence eternally within His body. The Lord certainly can enjoy whatever He likes, control all energies, dominate all other persons and exhibit complete omnipotency. Therefore it is to be understood that these eight mystic perfections are insignificant expansions of the mystic potency of the Lord, who in Bhagavad-gita is called Yogesvara, the Supreme Lord of all mystic potencies. These eight perfections are not artificial, but are natural and unexcelled because they originally exist in the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
The ten secondary mystic perfections arising from the modes of nature are the powers of freeing oneself from hunger and thirst and other bodily disturbances, hearing and seeing things far away, moving the body at the speed of the mind; there is a particular subtle air that follows the mind. When the yogi merges this air together with the body and mind in Krishna by the potency of meditation on the Lord, his gross material body, like the subtle air, can follow the mind anywhere. This perfection is called mano-javah. Assuming any form one desires, entering the bodies of others, dying when one desires, witnessing the pastimes between the demigods and the celestial girls called Apsaras, completely executing one's determination and giving orders whose fulfilment is unimpeded. The power to know past, present and future; tolerance of heat, cold and other dualities; knowing the minds of others; checking the influence of fire, sun, water, poison, one's remaining invulnerable to all types of weapons as well as attacks by nails, teeth, beating, curses and other such sources.; and remaining unconquered by others– five perfections of the mystic process of yoga are considered to be quite inferior to the others already mentioned, since they involve more or less ordinary physical and mental manipulations.
6. Materialistic people acquire these simple abilities either through taking some drugs or having some trauma, without fixing their mind in the Supreme Lord. Their perfections are gross and inferior reflection of various mystic potencies acquired by yogis who attain more advanced perfections by meditating on God.
7. Krishna gives the following list of paranormal, mystic perfections also explaining how to attain them:
- One who worships Me in My atomic form pervading all subtle elements, fixing his mind on that alone, obtains the mystic perfection called anima (becoming smaller than the smallest).
- One who absorbs his mind in the particular form of the mahat-tattva (totality of material elements) and thus meditates upon Me as the Supreme Soul of the total material existence achieves the mystic perfection called mahima (becoming greater than the greatest). By further absorbing the mind in the situation of each individual element such as the sky, air, fire, and so on, one progressively acquires the greatness of each material element.
- I exist within everything, and I am therefore the essence of the atomic constituents of material elements. By attaching his mind to Me in this form, the yogi may achieve the perfection called laghima (becoming lighter than the lightest), by which he realizes the subtle atomic substance of time.
- Fixing his mind completely in Me within the element of false ego generated from the mode of goodness, the yogi obtains the power of mystic acquisition, by which he becomes the proprietor of the senses of all living entities. He obtains such perfection because his mind is absorbed in Me.
- One who concentrates all mental activities in Me as the Supersoul of that phase of the mahat-tattva which manifests the chain of fruitive activities obtains from Me, whose appearance is beyond material perception, the most excellent mystic perfection called prakamya (assume any shape or form one may even whimsically desire).
- One who places his consciousness on Vishnu, the Supersoul, the prime mover and Supreme Lord of the external energy consisting of three modes, obtains the mystic perfection of controlling other conditioned souls, their material bodies and their bodily designations.
- One who places his consciousness on Vishnu, the Supersoul, the prime mover and Supreme Lord of the external energy consisting of three modes, obtains the mystic perfection of controlling other conditioned souls, their material bodies and their bodily designations.
- The yogi who places his mind in My form of Narayana as turiya, known as the fourth factor or beyond the modes, full of all opulences, becomes endowed with My nature and thus obtains the mystic perfection called vashita or freedom from the modes of nature.
- One who fixes his pure mind on Me in My manifestation as the impersonal Brahman obtains the greatest happiness, wherein all his desires are completely fulfilled. This is called kamavasayita-siddhi, or the perfection of completely obtaining anything that one desires.
- A human being who concentrates on Me as the upholder of religious principles, the personification of purity and the Lord of Shvetadvipa obtains the pure existence in which he is freed from the six waves of material disturbance, namely hunger, thirst, decay, death, grief and illusion. I.o.w. by worshiping Lord Vishnu as the personification of material goodness one obtains the material benediction of freedom from bodily disturbance.
- That purified living entity who fixes his mind on the extraordinary sound vibrations occurring within Me as the personified sky and total life air is then able to perceive within the sky the speaking of all living entities.
I.o.w. one who meditates on the Supreme Lord as the personified sky and air thereby acquires the ability to hear that which is vibrated at great distance.
- Merging one's sight into the sun planet and then the sun planet into one's eyes, one should meditate on Me as existing within the combination of sun and vision; thus one acquires the power to see any distant thing.
- The yogi who completely absorbs his mind in Me, and who then makes use of the wind that follows the mind to absorb the material body in Me, obtains through the potency of meditation on Me the mystic perfection by which his body immediately follows his mind wherever it goes. There is a particular subtle air that follows the mind. When the yogi merges this air together with the body and mind in Krshna by the potency of meditation on the Lord, his gross material body, like the subtle air, can follow the mind anywhere. This perfection is called mano-javah.
- When the yogi, applying his mind in a certain way, desires to assume a particular form, that very form immediately appears. Such perfection is possible by absorbing the mind in the shelter of My inconceivable mystic potency, by which I assume innumerable forms. This perfection is called kama-rupa, or the ability to assume any form that one desires.
- When a perfect yogi desires to enter another's body, he should meditate upon himself within the other body, and then, giving up his own gross body, he should enter the other's body through the pathways of air, as easily as a bee leaves one flower and flies into another. One may admire a heroic man or beautiful woman and desire to experience life within their extraordinary material body. Such opportunities are available through the mystic perfection called para-kaya-praveshanam.
- The yogi who has achieved the mystic perfection called svacchanda-mrityu blocks the anus with the heel of the foot and then lifts the soul from the heart to the chest, to the neck and finally to the head. Situated within the brahma-randhra, the yogι then gives up his material body and guides the spirit soul to the selected destination. This mystic opulence of svacchandu-mrityu, or dying at will.
- The yogi who desires to enjoy in the pleasure gardens of the demigods should meditate on the purified mode of goodness, which is situated within Me, and then the heavenly women, generated from the mode of goodness, will approach him in airplanes.
- A yogi who has faith in Me, absorbing his mind in Me and knowing that My purpose is always fulfilled, will always achieve his purpose by the very means he has determined to follow.
- By the mystic power called yatha-sankalpa-samsiddhi one will achieve one's objective even if one pursues it at an inauspicious time.
- A person who perfectly meditates on Me acquires My nature of being the supreme ruler and controller. His order, like Mine, can never be frustrated by any means.
- A yogi who has purified his existence by devotion to Me and who thus expertly knows the process of meditation obtains knowledge of past, present and future. He can therefore see the birth and death of himself and others.
- Just as the bodies of aquatics cannot be injured by water, similarly, the body of a yogi whose consciousness is pacified by devotion to Me and who is fully developed in yoga science cannot be injured by fire, sun, water, poison, and so forth. I.o.w for one skilled in the techniques of yoga, fending off attacks by weapons, fire, poison, and so on, is a recreational activity.
- My devotee becomes unconquerable by meditating on My opulent incarnations, which are decorated with Shrivatsa and various weapons and are endowed with imperial paraphernalia such as flags, ornamental umbrellas and fans.
- A learned devotee who worships Me through yoga meditation certainly obtains in all respects the mystic perfections that I have described.
8. The person who is perfect in all mystic powers all the time without beginning and end, from Who all the yogis get their desired mystic perfections is called Yogesvara or the Lord and master of all mystic perfections. This is the definition and description of God.
9. God exists.

References
1. Fontana, David (2005). Is There an Afterlife?. New Alresford: O Books. pp. 352–381. ISBN 1-903816-90-4.
2. a b "Glossary of Psi (Parapsychological) Terms (A-D)". Parapsych.org. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
3. Miller, Sukie (1998). After Death: How People Around the World Map the Journey After Life (1st Touchstone ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780684838694.
4. Astral Dynamics by Robert Bruce. Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Inc, 1999 ISBN 1-57174-143-7
5. Preston Peet (2007-12-19). "Chambers Dictionary of the Unexplained: Una McGovern: 9780550102157: Amazon.com: Books". Amazon.com. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
6. Gurney, Edmund (2011). Phantasms of the Living. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108027328.
7. Flower, Michael (2007). The seer in ancient Greece ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520252295.
8. Miller, Sukie (1998). After Death: How People Around the World Map the Journey After Life (1st Touchstone ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 167–192. ISBN 9780684838694.
9. Edzard Ernst. "A primer of complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by cancer patients | Medical Journal of Australia". Mja.com.au. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
10. Loewenthal, Kate (2009). Religion, Culture and Mental Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–107. ISBN 9780521107778.
11. Oldridge, Darren (2007). Strange Histories: The Trial of the Pig, the Walking Dead, and Other Matters of Fact from the Medieval and Renaissance Worlds. London: Routledge. p. "Werewolves and Flying Witches". ISBN 9780415404921.
12. "medium - The Skeptic's Dictionary". Skepdic.com. Retrieved 2013-11-09.
13. Randi, James (1995). An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 0-312-13066-X.
14. Spence, Lewis (2007). Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology (3rd ed.). [Whitefish, Mont.]: Kessinger Publishing. p. 750. ISBN 978-0-7661-2817-0.
15. Braude, Stephen E. (2002). ESP and Psychokinesis: A Philosophical Examination (Rev. ed.). Parkland, Fla.: Brown Walker Press. p. 21. ISBN 1-58112-407-4.
16. Beloff, John (1997). Parapsychology: a Concise History (1st paperback ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-312-17376-0.
17. Genzmer, Herbert (2007). Mysteries of the World: Unexplained Wonders and Mysterious Phenomena (American ed.). Bath: Parragon. p. 194. ISBN 1405490225.
18. Zusne, Leonard (1989). Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum. p. 167. ISBN 0-8058-0508-7.
19. Wolman, Benjamin B. (1986). Handbook of Parapsychology (Repr. ed.). Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland. pp. 921–936. ISBN 9780899501864.
20. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society: A postgraduate conference
21. Hamilton, Trevor (2009). Immortal Longings: FWH Myers and the Victorian Search for Life after Death. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic. p. 121. ISBN 978-1-84540-248-8.

The argument of true evidence in psychology (i)
1. Many people who are clinically mentally healthy have experienced paranormal events, so for educated people to write them off with extreme prejudice comes across more as an emotional rather than an empirical response.
2. Studying energies, ghosts and, yes, even faeries is not considered classical science, and metaphysical researchers are often branded as kooks and charlatans.  Is there validity to their work, and can it be considered true science?
2a. The answer to both questions is yes, paranormal occurrences can be tested with science and technology.
3. We now find organizations of professional scientists who openly study phenomena lying on the edge between physical science and the realms of mysticism and the paranormal. Examples are the International Association for New Science (IANS), the Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE), the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), and the International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine (ISSSEEM). These all sponsor regular scientific conferences.
3a. The Journal of Scientific Exploration is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal of the Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE). The publication is providing "a professional forum for presentations, criticism, and debate concerning topics which are for various reasons ignored or studied inadequately within mainstream science." The journal was initially established to provide a forum for three main fields that had largely been neglected by mainstream science: ufology, crypto zoology, and parapsychology. It has also published research articles, essays, and book reviews on many other topics, including the philosophy of science, pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact, alternative medicine, the process of peer review for controversial topics,[6] astrology, consciousness, reincarnation, minority opinion scientific theories, and paranormal phenomena.
3b. Lucius Werthmüller is a Swiss writer and parapsychologist with a life-long research interest in the paranormal. On a recent visit to the United States, including the SF Bay Area, Lucius presented a workshop on parapsychology at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), during which he showed documentary films of paranormal healers, sometimes also called “psychic surgeons.” Here is the story of one movie.
-- Romilda, a 15 minute film, shows a Brazilian woman, in her late twenties or early thirties, performing surgery to remove a cyst the size of a golf ball from Lucius Werthmüller’s neck. She uses a surgical knife to make the initial incision but then uses her gloved hands to remove the cyst. As in the other procedures shown in these films, there is no use of anesthetics to stop pain or antibiotics to stop infection. Lucius is awake during the whole operation, is talking and cracking jokes with the surgeon-healer and other family members and observers. The incision is manually closed after the procedure, the skin pulled together, and the area wiped clean. In the middle of the procedure, Romilda the surgeon, responding to some inner intuition, breaks into a lilting Brazilian lullaby. Lucius told us that Romilda was a foundling: she had been abandoned by her mother in a trash can in Rio de Janeiro after her birth, and has only elementary school education.  She discovered her healing abilities as a teen-ager and has been practicing ever since.
-- For many people, accepting the possible reality of healings through such unusual methods is perhaps more threatening than the mere sight of blood lying around. Looking for explanations in terms of “faking” is the cheap way out. The best is to watch the film and face the reality of phenomena of spiritual healing that go far beyond what the present sciences can explain.
3c. Is the human body merely a complex biological machine, or is our health sustained by "subtle energies" that can be guided for healing? These are the questions posed by the field of energy medicine. Since 1990, the International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine (ISSSEEM) has hosted the world’s most eminent scholars and practitioners within this revolutionary new medical field. From the effects of bioelectromagnetic energy on the body to the healing effects of prayer to subtle energy practices of other cultures, the book 'Energy Medicine' gathers the best of these celebrated conferences for the first time ever.  Among the twelve medical pioneers who lift the veil on some of today's most exciting scientific discoveries Dr. Larry Dossey explains about scientific evidence for prayer as a healing force and Dr. Caroline Myss presents a penetrating look inside the mind of a medical intuitive.
4. The parapsychologist Ian Stevenson has given an example of a poltergeist case from India that involves disappearing food.[1] It seems that a woman from the village of Degaon, south of Bombay, had the reputation in the village of being a sorceress. Food mysteriously disappearing in the village was turning up in her dwelling.
5a. Stevenson’s informant, one Swami Krishnanand, decided to put her abilities to the test. In one instance, “Swami Krishnanand … pointed to a lota (pot) which he held in his hand and to a man who was milking a cow some distance away, and asked to have some of the milk put into the lota. Instantly the lota became filled with milk and at the same time the milk-man noticed that his vessel had less, rather than more, milk in it. He looked up astonished.”[2] The woman believed that these effects were due to a discarnate spirit that was allied with her, and Stevenson was inclined to favor this interpretation.
5b. Uri Geller. Geller is one of the most well-known "psychics" who has publicly demonstrated feats of psycho kinesis: spoon and key bending have become almost synonymous with Geller's name. Although many skeptics and magicians consider his metal-bending performances nothing more than adroit sleight-of-hand, Geller has allegedly shown that he can manifest the effects over great distances and in multiple locations. On a British radio show in 1973, after demonstrating key bending to the astonishment of the host, Geller invited the listening audience to participate. Just minutes later, phone calls began pouring into the radio station from listeners all over the UK reporting that knives, forks, spoons, keys and nails began to bend and twist spontaneously. Watches and clocks that had not run in years began to work. It was an event whose success surprised even Geller and thrust him into the spotlight.
6. There are many accounts of this nature, it follows that miracles are real even though not due to the direct action of God or the highly placed servants of God known as demigods. But there are many supernatural beings between Heaven and earth,
As the USA government eg has so many ministers, secretaries, clerks, administrators, cleaners etc etc a giant bureaucracy.
7. Newton introduced the strict mathematical formulation of the laws of nature known as the “laws of physics.” By experimental measurements one can confirm the laws with great accuracy.
8. Laws of physics are completely incompatible with the kind of miraculous events.
9. No occurrence of any action takes place without someone’s will and control.
10. As the gross physical entities can operate on the gross physical level so there are living entities who operate and control things in the subtle, to us non-visible dimension.
11. God operates on an even higher, more subtle dimension namely the spiritual dimension visible only for spiritually advanced souls.
12. God exists.

References
1. Stevenson, Ian, July, 1972, “Are Poltergeists Living or Are They Dead?” The Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 66, No. 3.
2. Ibid.

The Argument from the Hard Problem of Consciousness
1. The Hard Problem of Consciousness for materialists consists in the difficulty in explaining why it subjectively feels like something witnessing the functioning brain and body. (This is to be distinguished from the so-called Easy Problem of Consciousness, which is to explain why some brain processes are unconscious and others are conscious.) Just like you reader, suppose you are young man. You had a body of a child. You remember that you had a body of a child, but that body is no longer existing. But you remember; therefore you, the owner of the body, is existing. Otherwise how do you remember, "I had a body like this with this measurement? But that body is no longer existing, but you are remembering. So you are the owner and witness, transcendental to the body. Just like you have now for example a black coat. Say after two days you may put on another colored coat, but you remember that "I was putting on one black coat on that day." So you are existing; the coat is changed. Similarly, the soul is existing; the body is changed. Therefore it is natural to know that when you are an old man and will die, then I change this body, I get another body. A text from Bhagavad-Gita (2.13) says: “As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change.” Because he has witnessed during the life in this body, many reincarnations literally changes of flesh, in science called turn-over times of ALL the parts of the body. He knows:”Many bodies have died, new bodies came, now this old body will go, I know already I am eternal,” so he has no fear.
2. Consciousness (in the Hard-Problem sense) is not a complex phenomenon built out of simpler ones; it consists of the irreducible substrate or basis of “raw feels, thoughts and desires” like seeing red, tasting salt, experiencing feelings, having thoughts.
3. Science explains complex phenomena by reducing them to simpler ones, and reducing them to still simpler ones, until the simplest ones are explained by the basic laws of physics.
4. The basic laws of physics describe the properties of the elementary constituents of matter and energy, like quarks and quanta, which are not conscious.
5. Science cannot derive to consciousness by reducing it to basic physical laws about the elementary constituents of matter and energy (from 2, 3, and 4). Science doesn’t have a theory of neuroscience that explains how consciousness emerges from patterns of neural activity
6. Material science will never solve the Hard Problem of Consciousness (from 3 and 5) because it is not an emergent of matter (see 1) since it is the eternal transcendental spectator of matter
7. The explanation for consciousness is that it is beyond physical laws (from 6).
8. Consciousness, lying outside physical laws, must itself be immaterial (from 7). Every measurable manifestation of consciousness, like our ability to describe what we feel, or let our feelings guide our behavior (the “Easy Problem” of consciousness), has been, or will be, explained in terms of neural activity (that is, every thought, feeling, and intention has a neural correlate). Only the existence of consciousness itself (the “Hard Problem”) remains mysterious, for materialists.
9. God is also immaterial. When you reader understand that "I, the proprietor of the body, I am different from this body," then you will understand God also, very easily. Because you are the proprietor of this body, and you are given the controlling power of the body by thinking, feeling, willing, by acting. You have your body. You are sitting. You can say, "Now I am going away." The body is under your control. You can do that. Similarly, when you understand this fully, then you'll understand that in this huge, gigantic body, material cosmic manifestation, there is also an immaterial proprietor and controller, easily. God is not different in quality than you. God means like you in huge, unlimited quantity. As you have got little intelligence—you can create a wonderful thing, Boeing 747 airplane flying in the air—so God has got unlimited brain. Millions and trillions of universes are floating or flying in the air. The process is the same. You are teeny. You are very much proud that "I am so advanced that I have manufactured the 747." Now compare with the intelligence of God? Such a huge lump of matter, the sun, is floating also there. That is the difference between you and God. You have got brain, He has got brain, but your the brain is very teeny, little, and His brain very big. That is difference between you and God. So if you understand yourself, sample of God, then you understand the Supreme God.
10a. Consciousness and God both consist of the same immaterial kind of being (from 8 and 9). Consciousness comes from a spark of the divine, the soul.
10b. God has not only the means to impart consciousness to us, but also the motive—namely, to allow us to enjoy a good life, and to make it possible for our choices to cause or prevent suffering in others, thereby allowing for morality and meaning.
11. God exists.

The Digital Physics Argument
1. Simulations can only exist in a computer or a mind.
2. The universe can be imitated in a computer simulation. Thus the original is also created by a mind.
3. A simulation on a computer still must be simulated in a mind.
4. Therefore, the universe is a simulation in a mind (2, 3).
5. This mind is what all men call God.
6. Therefore, God exists.

The Argument from the Inconceivability of Personal Annihilation
1. I cannot conceive of my own annihilation: as soon as I am thinking, this implies that I exist (as in Descartes’ Cogito ergo sum). And I will always exist as the Bhagavad-Gita (2.12-24) explains:
“Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be. As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change. Those who are seers of the truth have concluded that of the nonexistent [the material body] there is no endurance and of the eternal [the soul] there is no change. This they have concluded by studying the nature of both. That which pervades the entire body you should know to be indestructible. No one is able to destroy that imperishable soul. For the soul there is neither birth nor death at any time. He has not come into being, does not come into being, and will not come into being. He is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval. He is not slain when the body is slain. As a person puts on new garments, giving up old ones, the soul similarly accepts new material bodies, giving up the old and useless ones. The soul can never be cut to pieces by any weapon, nor burned by fire, nor moistened by water, nor withered by the wind. This individual soul is unbreakable and insoluble, and can be neither burned nor dried. He is everlasting, present everywhere, unchangeable, immovable and eternally the same.”
This implies that I cannot be thinking about what it is like not to exist.
2. My annihilation is inconceivable (from 1).
3. What cannot be conceived, cannot be.
4. I cannot be annihilated (from 2 and 3).
5. I survive after my death (from 4). The body is changing from one form to another, but the spirit soul is existing eternally. This fact we can experience even in our own life. Since the beginning of our material body in the womb of our mother, the body is transforming from one shape to another in every second and in every minute. This process is generally known as growth, but actually it is change of body. On this earth planet we see change of day and night and of seasons. The more primitive mentality attributes this change to changes occurring in the sun. For example, in the winter they think the sun is getting weaker, and at night they presume sometimes that the sun is dead. With more advanced knowledge of discovery we see that sun is not changing at all in this way. Seasonal and diurnal changes are attributed to the change of the position of the earth planet. Similarly, we experience bodily changes from embryo to child to youth to maturity to old age and to death. The less intelligent mind presumes that at the death the spirit soul's existence is forever finished, just like primitive tribes who believe that the sun dies at sunset. Actually, the sun is rising in another part of the world. Similarly, the soul is accepting another type of body. When the body gets old like the old garments and is no longer usable, then the soul accepts another body just like we accept a new suit of clothes. The modern civilization is enamored by the glimmering manifestation of the cosmic body or the individual body, but they do not try to understand the basic principles of this glimmering situation. The body looks very beautiful working with full energy and exhibiting great traits of talent and wonderful brain work. But as soon as the soul is away from the body, all this glimmering situation of the body becomes useless. Even the great scientists who have discovered many wonderful scientific contributions could not trace out about the personal self, which is the cause of such wonderful discoveries. You can find out the background of this body as the soul and the soul's presence as perceived, perceptible by consciousness. Similarly, the presence of Supersoul and super-consciousness in the universal body of cosmic manifestation is perceived by the presence of the Supreme Lord, or the Absolute Truth. The Absolute Truth is realized in three phases of understanding, namely as Brahman, or the impersonal universal soul; Paramatma, or the localized universal soul; and at the end as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. An individual soul is understood in three aspects, namely first in the consciousness pervading all over the body, then as the spirit soul within the heart, and ultimately exhibited as a person. Similarly, the Absolute Truth is first realized as impersonal Brahman, then as localized Supersoul, Paramatma, and at the end as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krishna. Krishna means all-inclusive, or, in other words, Krishna is simultaneously Brahman, Paramatma, and the Personality of Godhead. As such, as every one of us is simultaneously consciousness, soul, and person, this individual person and the Supreme Lord Person are qualitatively one but quantitatively different. Just like the drop of sea water and the vast mass of sea water—both are qualitatively one. The chemical composition of the drop of sea water and that of the mass of sea water are one and the same, but the quantity of salt and other minerals in the whole sea is many, many times greater than the quantity of salt and other minerals contained in the drop of sea water. The Supreme Lord, or Krishna, is the maintainer of the individual living entities.
6. God exists.

Argument from star trek
1. Star Trek is a show with supernatural phenomenons.
2. All the wonders in it seem like magic but it's actually yoga science!
3. These mystic perfection are also known as yogic siddhi’s or perfections.
- one transforms one's own body becoming smaller than the smallest or becoming greater than the greatest,
- one can become lighter than the lightest,
- one can acquires whatever one desires,
- one can experiences any enjoyable object, either in this world or the next,
- one can obtain anything from anywhere, to the highest possible limit.
4. Atheists say: " Even if all those extraordinary reports about miracles turn out to be real, it doesn't mean God exists."
5. However, humans are not born with abilities of telepathy, telekinesis, omnipotence etc. These abilities have to be acquired.
6. As electricity comes from a powerhouse so mystic abilities have a source. Moreover these have to belong to a person and only a person can give an ability to somebody else who desires to have e.g. telepathy, telekinesis etc.
7. The atheist can say: "These abilities are coming from the unexplored, undeveloped parts of the brain."
8. We reply: Dr. J. B. Rhine and other parapsychologists have shown persuasive evidence for telepathy (the ability to read another person's thoughts) and clairvoyance (the ability to perceive objects and events without using your senses). And experiments have shown that both telepathy and clairvoyance can work over long distances.
8a. The brain works locally but the mystical abilities go even further, out of the body and do not depend on the functioning of the brain just like at the time of clinical death there is sometimes an experience of the outer world without any functioning of the brain and heart.
9. This means mystical powers are within the mind, which is a subtle energy that continues to exist after the material body dies and can independently function of the material body also during clinical death or real death.
10. As per point 6 & 8a the mystical abilities have to be received from outside from a conscious source who has all the mystic perfections within Him.
11. This conscious source of mystic powers who fulfils the desires of all mystics for mystic perfections is God.
12. God exists.

 The argument of the original economy
1. Nowadays people are wondering why there are many times economic crises.
2. However, in Vedic times more than 5000 years ago the economy was flourishing because people did perform sacrifices for the pleasure of God.
3. In Hastinapura, Dhritarashtra had performed five sacrifices with the wealth Pandu had bestowed upon him. He gave charity to hundreds of thousands of brahmanas and satisfied the gods with his offerings. The kingdom flourished and the citizens had everything they desired. They were devoted to virtue, sacrifice and truth. Bearing love and affection for one another, they grew in prosperity. Hastinapura was like the ocean filled with numerous palaces and mansions. There were golden arches and crystal fountains everywhere. Between broad, paved highways lay beautiful gardens and the air was filled with the sweet fragrance of blossoming trees. The clatter of horses’ hooves and chariot wheels mixed with the trumpeting of elephants and the blare of conch shells which mark the beginning of sacrificial performances. Holy chants uttered by numerous Brahmins emanated from tall and exquisitely carved temple buildings, which graced the city in their thousands. Hastinapura appeared like Indra’s celestial capital, and each day dozens of feudal kings would come to bring tribute.
4. Nowadays people are wondering why there is global warming.
b. However, in Vedic times more than 5000 years ago the rain would fall at night and during the day there was nice weather.
c. The balance of the weather was maintained by sacrifices for the pleasure of God.
d. Once Raghavendra Tirtha was requested to come to the palace of King Vijayaraghava to perform the Varuna Yajna to bring rain to the kingdom. This part of the counrty hadn't seen rain in a long time, so as the king was very responsible and pious, he brought the best of brahmanas there to invoke rain.  Raghavendra Tirtha first as usual performed the preliminary pujas and then worshiped Mula Rama.  He requested the Supreme Lord, Rama, the controller of the three worlds, to empower him to purely perform the yajna (sacrifice) as requested and to give the required result, rain, to the people in the kingdom.
4b. That night after the yajna, there was a heavy downpour.  It was not a violent storm, but very pleasing.  Invoked by the pure devotion of Raghavendra Swami, everyone reaped a 'bumper crop' that year.
5. God, who awards the result of sacrifices, so that people can live happily in this and the next life, exists.

 Argument from blindness
1. Atheists are spiritually blind. In our practical experience we never see that inert bricks can themselves construct a big building. What is taking place within your practical experience by chance?
2. They are also blind about the soul; In your childhood you were conscious, in your boyhood you were conscious, in your youth you were conscious, and as you progress to old age you will be conscious. So your body is changing, but your consciousness continues unchanged. This you cannot deny. Therefore the Bhagavad-gita says, na hanyate hanyamane sarire: [Bg. 2.20] "Consciousness is eternal. It is not vanquished with the destruction of the temporary body." Or another example: a child born. If the child is born dead, it is simply dead matter. It does not grow. But if the child is living, or the spirit soul is within that body, then it develops.
3. Similarly, the whole cosmic manifestation, this big universe, unless there is, in the center, the Supreme Spirit, how it develops? It cannot develop. Either you take this body or take this universal body—without the spirit being entered within it, there cannot be development. If they accept that life started from life, then they'll have to accept God, the Supreme Person. Just like by practical experience we see one life is produced by another life. The father, mother begets a child. Not that a child drops from the sky. Their test tube experiment also depends on the father and mother. Where is the proof that in the test tube you mix some chemical and produce a child. Then your theory is all right. You cannot create even an ant, even a fly. And still you are claiming that you can manufacture human being? We can see life started from life, father begetting child. We can see father is a living man, and another child will be born. But where is life starting from matter? Where is that evidence? Life starting from life, we have got practical experience, but where is the evidence that life started from matter? They have no practical experience that life is coming from matter. That is called vriscika-tandula-nyaya. You have no experience in your country. In India there is. Sometimes you'll find, a scorpion is coming out from the stack of rice.. So some are thinking the rice is producing the scorpion. It is called tandula-vriscika-nyaya. But rice cannot produce a life. The real fact is a scorpion lays down the egg within the rice, and by the fermentation the small creature comes out. And foolish creatures, they think it that the rice is producing scorpion.
4. Another example: an airplane is flying in the sky but it is not independently flying. There is the pilot. He is pushing the button, and it is flying. A big car, big machine, big factory—without touch of spiritual consciousness, there is no question of moving. We have got this practical experience. Where is the evidence that, without the touch of spirit soul, that machine is moving? Is there any evidence? Then how you can say that without God, the whole universe is moving? There is no evidence. We have no such experience. Then how you can say that without the direction of God, the material nature can move? The atheists say “Big Bang” They do not see who is behind this explosion. That is their ignorance or poor fund of knowledge. We have got practical experience that no explosion takes place without the touch of a human being. Similarly, even there was explosion going on before the creation, but there is a touch of the Supreme Being. If we are seeing the explosion, we know somebody caused it. But if a child sees an explosion, he does not know that behind the explosion, there is a management of a superior being. This is childish observation. In scripture we read that behind everything, the hand of the Supreme Being is there, and by our practical experience also, we see that matter does not act automatically without being touched by a living being, so how we can accept this argument, that the explosion is going on automatically? What is the evidence? There is no evidence.
5. Another example, the original water of the oceans came from the perspiration of God. Just like you have perspiration. You can produce, say, one gram or, say, one ounce of water through your bodily heat. So if you can produce one ounce of water from your body, why God cannot produce volumes and millions of tons of water from His body? Where is the difficulty to understand? You are a tiny soul, and you have got a small body. You can produce one ounce of water by your perspiration. Why God, who has got the gigantic body of His universe, He cannot produce water.
6. And where is God. Just like a big man, rich man: he is the enjoyer and he has got many servants. The capitalist, he starts some business, big factory. Ten thousand men are working, but the capitalist is not working. He is aloof from the factory. In a nice place, in a nice bungalow, garden house, he is enjoying. Similarly, God, Krishna, He is the enjoyer, aloof in Heaven. He is there with His elder brother, enjoying in the forest, sporting with His cowherd boy friends and girlfriends, His cows, calves. A big man, he is sitting at his home. With his family he's enjoying. But he is managing many, many hundreds of factories sitting there. Big, big business magnate, they do not come to the office, neither he goes to the factory. Simply by his order, telephone, "You do this,"; things are going on. So if it is possible materially that one ordinary man, he can manage hundreds of factories and offices without going there, simply by his order, so how much powerful is Krishna we have to imagine. The demigods, God’s secretaries manage. Just like demigod Indra: he's managing the affairs of rains, how to collect the clouds, how to disperse them. In this way there is so much universal management. But all these managements are going on under the supreme management of Krishna, God in heaven.
7. Therefore, God exists.

The argument from manifestations
1. When you perform bhakti-yoga, the yoga of love, you will see God, also called Krishna or Govinda, the primeval Lord. He the first Father, who is tending cows, yielding all desire, in abodes built with spiritual gems, surrounded by millions of wish-fulfilling trees, always served with great reverence and affection by hundreds of thousands of lakshmis or gopis. The spiritual (cit) potency has built the spiritual world of transcendental gems. The cintamani which serves as material in the building of the abode of the Supreme Lord of Goloka, is a far rarer and more pleasing entity than the philosopher's stone. The purpose tree yields only the fruits of piety, wealth, fulfilment of desire and liberation; but the purpose trees in the abode of Krishna bestow innumerable fruits in the shape of varieties divine love. Kama-dhenus (cows yielding the fulfilment of desire) give milk when they are milked; but the kama-dhenus of Goloka pour forth oceans of milk in the shape of the fountain of love showering transcendental bliss that does away with the hunger and thirst of all pure devotees, the liberated souls. Govinda, the primeval Lord, who is adept in playing on His flute, with blooming eyes like lotus petals with head decked with peacock's feather, with the figure of beauty tinged with the hue of blue clouds, and His unique loveliness charming millions of Cupids. That flute by his enchanting musical sound attracts the hearts of all living beings. Just as a lotus petal produces a pleasant sight, so the two beautiful eyes of Krishna who causes the manifestation of our spiritual vision, display the unlimited splendour and beauty of His moon-like face. The loveliness that adorns His head with peacock feather figures, the corresponding feature of the spiritual beauty of Krishna. Just as a mass of blue clouds offers a specifically soothing, pleasant view, the complexion of Krishna is analogously tinged with a spiritual dark-blue color. The beauty and loveliness of Krishna is far more enchanting than that of Cupid multiplied a million-fold. Govinda, the primeval Lord, round whose neck is swinging a garland of flowers beautified with the moon-locket, whose two hands are adorned with the flute and jewelled ornaments, who always revels in pastimes of love, spiritual amorous sports, whose graceful threefold-bending form of Syamasundara is eternally manifest. Govinda, the primeval Lord, whose transcendental form is full of bliss, truth, substantiality and is thus full of the most dazzling splendour. Each of the limbs of that transcendental figure possesses in Himself, the full-fledged functions of all the organs, and eternally sees, maintains and manifests the infinite universes, both spiritual and mundane.
2. Therefore, God exists.

Argument from incredulity
1. How could God NOT exist? Nothing else can take His place.
2. Because there are 4 philosophies on the cause of all causes and effects.
a. brahmayjoti or light. This theory has no experiment to proof itself; light has never produced prebiotic material and life. In fact, light always is caused by a source of light and is never independent cause.
b. sunya or nothingness, nothing, zero. Absolute Nothingness doesn't even exist, so zero for this theory.
c. Nature, Big Bang and Accident. Show us in a closed room experiment. If you say: "I bring in this experiment forces as are working in Nature", then you proof Nature also has Persons creating forces.
d. God. Thus theory 4 or d is true. God is the cause of all causes and effects.
We can also positively prove this; we see in human history how humans create robots similar to humans, plastic flowers (not as good as Gods' flowers), dummy humans cows pigs, heavens or paradises, hells or concentration camps or penalty colonies as in Siberia, planetariums. Similarly, God creates humans, plants, animals, Heaven, hell, the planetary systems.
3. Therefore, God exists.

The argument of the imperfect god, failing to become more perfect
1. Speculator (S): God creates the universe by reflecting meanings in His consciousness into matter. This creation is similar to the creation of artistic products like books and paintings. The universe is the product of a creative urge in the creator by which He externalizes His personality into matter. Notions of God’s personality and His nature therefore precede the existence of the universe.
2. Theist (T): The material creation is a prison-house. God has no need for it, such as to express His bhavas– emotions.
There is only one emotion:  come back home, back to Godhead or the spiritual world.
The creation of the material world in existentialism or process theology is a necessary part of God. This means God always has the imperfection with Him. The ethics for a human become to actualize and develop himself, but there will always be a sour footnote: whatever you make, Time will destroy it all. And matter is always permeated with misery- birth, disease, old age, death, karma, the guna’s or modes of nature, sufferings imposed by nature, other living entities and one’s own body and mind.
God, according to this speculation, was always imperfect and the conclusion is that He will always be imperfect. How this is a perfect philosophy, with an imperfect God? God using His creation to come to full self-development has truth to it. However, Whitehead and Hartshorne only recognize one energy; the external energy.  His expanding pleasure does not apply to the external energy. It does apply to the internal potency. This is the crucial difference. There is another nature. We, spirit souls, are internal energy, and we have our home in the spiritual nature, outside of the material nature. Whitehead and Hartshorne do “natural theology,” that is, theology not dependent upon “revelation.” However, all knowledge is revelation, but the revelation in all cases is proportionate to one’s qualification (e.g. in the material world, there is knowledge in goodness, passion, and ignorance; in transcendence  there is brahman, paramatma, bhagavan, and so on.) The external energy is for the development of the jivas, and it is a prison, and the jivas here are largely locked out of the internal dynamics of the spiritual energy, by which both God and his devotees ever increase in beauty, knowledge, and love. That takes place perpetually in Krsna’s spiritual energy or svarupa-sakti or antaranga sakti.
3. (S): God as pure pleasure and knowledge expands His personality in six different ways to obtain knowledge and pleasure.
4. (T): He does not enjoy matter, he creates a material world which is temporary and meant for pain and punishment.   anityam asukham lokam   Bhag Gita 9.33
                                          dukhAlayam asAsvatam  Bhag Gita 8.15
5. (S): God is still enjoying through this creation. It is the pleasure that a mother gets from punishing the children.
6. (T): No mother likes beating, in fact she is not allowed, only to threaten.
  Your words are ''to obtain knowledge and pleasure.” God does not make the material world to get bliss, ananda and knowledge, jnana.
The material world is to give facility and punishment for the imitation gods-the souls.
God is never suffering,  therefore he sends avataras, descents. Caitanya Caritamrta antya 3.52  Haridasa Thakura replied, “My dear Lord, do not be in anxiety. Do not be unhappy to see the condition of the yavanas in material existence.”
PURPORT
These words of Haridasa Thakura cinta na kariha—do not be in anxiety, are just befitting a devotee who has dedicated his life and soul to the service of the Lord. When the Lord is unhappy because of the condition of the fallen souls, the devotee consoles Him, saying, “My dear Lord, do not be in anxiety.” This is service. Everyone should adopt the cause of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu to try to relieve Him from the anxiety He feels. This is actually service to the Lord. One who tries to relieve Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu’s anxiety for the fallen souls is certainly a most dear and confidential devotee of the Lord.
7. (S): God communicates information about Himself into matter. By this messaging God objectifies Himself in matter.
8. (T): True, but is a bit too rosy; it is not His prime purpose. In the prison He is as a by-product also visible; He may sometimes come, or put a painting or photograph of himself. The prison reflects him. But a king does not create a prison to message information about himself, for this he writes law-books, biographies, newspapers.
9. (S): Tapa– austerities is said to cause God to sweat, and that sweat is the causal ocean, the cause of the material world.
10. (T): He is not doing tapa; he is thinking (of the fallen souls, his thankless tasks, boring duties- again make this fools paradise) - sweats - karana samudra, causal ocean is created.
Maha-narayana Upanishad (1.4): atha punar eva narayanah so 'nyam kamam manasa dhyayet. tasya dhyanantah-sthasya lalanat svedo 'patat. ta ima pratatapa tasu tejo hiran-mayam andam tatra brahma catur-mukho 'jayata. "Then Lord Narayana meditated upon another desire of His, and as He pondered, a drop of perspiration fell from His forehead. All the material creations evolved from the fermentation of this drop. Therein the fiery, golden egg of the universe appeared, and within that globe four-headed Brahma took his birth."
11. (S): People exercise and it causes them to tire out. Do they enjoy it? Yes. Is it the highest pleasure? No. Why do you exercise? It is necessary evil. But is it suffering? Not necessarily. You can also enjoy it!
12. (T): We don’t exercise, that is only for over-eaters. Krsna not needs matter, as a king and his queen don't go to the prison-house to increase their pleasure . It is the inferior energy  apAra, bhinna  Bg 7.5  apara—inferior; iyam—this; itah—besides this; tu—but; anyam—another; prakritim—energy; viddhi—just try to understand; me—My; param—superior; jiva-bhutam—comprising the living entities; maha-baho—O mighty-armed one; yaya—by whom; idam—this; dharyate—is utilized or exploited; jagat—the material world.
TRANSLATION
Besides these, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is another, superior energy of Mine, which comprises the living entities who are exploiting the resources of this material, inferior nature.
13. (S): The pleasure of exercise, administering, organizing, maintaining, creating and destroying. This is not much of pleasure, but it is still pleasure. Perhaps if you think a bit about it, you might realize. The are three forms of Lord Vishnu within the material creation are certainly very happy!
14. (T): Why this is not done by Krishna, why it is delegated to His expansions. Because He is with Radha. That is happy.
"...material nature, ashamed of her thankless task of acting to induce the living entities to become averse to the Supreme Lord, remains behind the Lord in shyness".   CC adi 5.86
Brahma Samhita T 44 “The external potency Maya who is of the nature of the shadow of the cit potency, is worshiped by all people as Durga, the creating, preserving and destroying agency of this mundane world. I adore the primeval Lord Govinda in accordance with whose will Durga conducts herself.”
PURPORT
(The aforesaid presiding deity of Devi-dhama is being described.) The world, in which Brahma takes his stand and hymns the Lord of Goloka, is Devi-dhama consisting of the fourteen worlds and Durga is its presiding deity. She is ten-armed, representing the tenfold fruitive activities. She rides on the lion, representing her heroic prowess. She tramples down Mahishasura, representing the subduer of vices. She is the mother of two sons, Karttikeya and Ganesa, representing beauty and success. She is placed between Lakshmi and Sarasvati, representing mundane opulence and mundane knowledge. She is armed with the twenty weapons, representing the various pious activities enjoined by the Vedas for suppression of vices. She holds the snake, representing the beauty of destructive time. Such is Durga possessing all these manifold forms. Durga is possessed of durga, which means a prison house. When jivas begotten of the marginal potency (tatastha sakti) forget the service of Krishna they are confined in the mundane prison house, the citadel of Durga. The wheel of karma is the instrument of punishment at this place. The work of purifying these penalized jivas is the duty devolved upon Durga. She is incessantly engaged in discharging the same by the will of Govinda. When, luckily. the forgetfulness of Govinda on the part of imprisoned jivas is remarked by them by coming in contact with self-realized souls and their natural aptitude for the loving service of Krishna is aroused, Durga herself then becomes the agency of their deliverance by the will of Govinda. So it behoves everybody to obtain the guileless grace of Durga, the mistress of this prison house, by propitiating her with the selfless service of Krishna. The boons received from Durga in the shape of wealth, property, recovery from illness, of wife and sons, should be realized as the deluding kindness of Durga. The mundane psychical jubilations of dasa-maha-vidya, the ten goddesses or forms of Durga, are elaborated for the delusion of the fettered souls of this world. Jiva is a spiritual atomic part of Krishna. When he forgets his service of Krishna he is at once deflected by the attracting power of Maya in this world, who throws him into the whirlpool of mundane fruitive activity (karma) by confining him in a gross body constituted by the five material elements, their five attributes and eleven senses, resembling the garb of a prisoner. In this whirlpool jiva has experience of happiness and miseries, heaven and hell. Besides this, there is a subtle body. consisting of the mind, intelligence and ego, inside the gross body. By means of the subtle body. the jiva forsakes one gross body and takes recourse to another. The jiva cannot get rid of the subtle body. full of nescience and evil desires, unless and until he is liberated. On getting rid of the subtle body he bathes in the Viraja and goes up to Hari-dhama.
15. (S): God creates the universe “in His image”.
16. (T): It is a perverted reflection  Urdhva-mUlam adhah-sAkham  Bhagavad Gita 15.1
17. (S): But it is still God's image. There are two kinds of images - the shadow reflection which falls "behind" God and the reflection which falls in a mirror "in front of" God. You are not incorrect in calling it an inverted image, but an inverted image is still an image. The material and spiritual images are formed from the same language. It is for this reason that you can form deities and forms of God and speak about God in the material creation. We have to ask - if the universe is perverted, then how am I able to think of God here?
God’s glance over matter communicates information about Himself into matter. By this messaging God objectifies Himself in matter. God “impregnates” matter with His “seed”. This “seed” is subtle information about God that He communicates into matter to model matter after Himself.
18. (T): Matter is the inferior energy , it is separated. We are rebels, demons, devils, fallen angels, kicked out of paradise, it is not Gods pleasure to create it as a government doesn’t like to create the prison, it is not their self-expression but a necessary evil. The self-expression of God is His spiritual world.
19. (S): There is a progressive scheme of development of ideas into actions.
20. (T): God is satya-sankalpa, His desires become instantly objects.
21. (S): The souls and God need to know themselves and search for meaning in their existence; both are eternal but nevertheless driven by this need to realize their potential.
22. (T): God is atmarama. He can expand unlimitedly and thus unfold his potential. To say He needs to know Himself is saying there is a deficiency in Him. He can go from complete to more complete, more complete. He has meaning in His existence, which is more lila– pastimes; He is not searching for meaning as a ‘burnt out’ or frustrated soul in matter.
23. (S): Both God and the living beings are identical in that they exist, they have a desire to know themselves, they engage in actions to express and know themselves and rejoice in knowledge of their selves.
24. (T): Which Godhead wants and enjoys to know Himself; all They do is lila=play, sport, love- exchange.
25. (S): Creation too is the outcome of the need in God to know Himself as an individual.
26. (T): The spiritual world is His field of sat cit ananda eternal bliss and awareness. The material world  is asat acit nirananda; it is the prison house for rebel souls. God doesn’t need the prison-house just as the king doesn’t need the prison; he is happy enough in the palace.
27. (S): There is a need in consciousness to be self-conscious, and it exists in God as well.
28. (T): God is in cit– complete consciousness, cit sakti– energy is His servant.
29. (S): The world acts as an intermediary for consciousness to know itself through its acts of self-expression.
30. (T): This is for the jiva . He expresses his life of imitating god and suffers. And thus he learns, comes to know himself; what he should not do. And learns: “I better become a servant of God.”
31. (S): In this sense, the creation must be present for God to know Himself.
32. (T): God is fine without matter.
33. (S): God realizes Himself by becoming the content of His consciousness and creates the universe for it.
34. (T): Only if you mean that God realizes that the prison is needed for some jivas and thus He expands the purusa avataras, Himself Immanent, to govern the material world.
“The Lord wanted to create the cosmic manifestation to give another chance to the conditioned souls who were dormant in forgetfulness. The cosmic manifestation gives the conditioned souls a chance to go back home, back to Godhead, and that is its main purpose. The Lord is so kind that in the absence of such a manifestation He feels something wanting, and thus the creation takes place. Although the creation of the internal potency was manifested, the other potency appeared to be sleeping, and the Lord wanted to awaken her to activity, just as a husband wants to awaken his wife from the sleeping state for enjoyment. It is the compassion of the Lord for the sleeping energy that He wants to see her awaken for enjoyment like the other wives who are awake. The whole process is to enliven the sleeping conditioned souls to the real life of spiritual consciousness so that they may thus become as perfect as the ever-liberated souls in the Vaikunthalokas. Since the Lord is sac-cid-ananda-vigraha [Bs. 5.1], He likes every part and parcel of His different potencies to take part in the blissful rasa because participation with the Lord in His eternal rasa-lila is the highest living condition, perfect in spiritual bliss and eternal knowledge.”  (SB 3.25.4 purport)
35. (S): God creates the universe for His self-realization,.. God’s attempt at self-knowledge.. He creates the universe to create contexts for His self-awareness. In this sense, God’s creativity is more fundamental than the creativity of other individuals. God creates the world in His self-image to use those contexts for His own self-actualization.
36. (T): God has become many. Eko bahu syama. Why? Because as it is stated in the Vedanta-sutra, anandamayo 'bhyasat (Vedanta-sutra 1.1.12). He is by nature anandamaya, joyful. He wants to enjoy Himself with so many. ananda does not mean remaining one. No. Variety. Variety is the mother of enjoyment. So these varieties, they're all spiritual. So practically our creation is for enjoying in the company, in the association of the Supreme Lord. But we thought that it is better to become an imitation God and try to lord it over the material nature. That is not possible; therefore we are suffering outside of paradise.
37. (S): God desires Himself; since God must be self-aware in a true and honest sense, the content of His awareness must be Himself. His awareness in the self is also the awareness of the self. He is aware in Himself and aware about Himself at the same time, and these two are identical. The answer to why God seeks pleasure with Himself is therefore that He seeks pleasure arising out of His true and honest self-awareness.
38. (T): SB 8.19.18 “Being complete in Yourself, You have no other goal than taking care of Your devotee. You know what is necessary for Your devotees. You are affectionate to them. You are not aware of Your own needs.”  ( Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura bhasya sarartha darsini)
39. (S): When the material creation ceases, God is said to be “sleeping” or not self-aware. The sleep here is deep-sleep and not the dreaming stage where the mind can still create ideas.
40. (T): Maha-Vishnu and the God’s immanent return into Maha-Sankarsana, The Emanation of Krishna for Majesty and Opulence. They meditate on His origin; His glories. There is no susupti, dreamless sleep for God.
41. (S): Both ordinary conscious beings and God are capable of creating myriad visions of themselves. Through these visions, God incarnates into various different forms, and the living being chooses to exist in a particular type of existence.
42. (T): The avataras have their original forms in the spiritual world. These forms are also for increasing the ananda Krishna, the Absolute anandamaya has become many: eko bahu syama. We are also Krishna's parts and parcels, meant to give pleasure to Krishna. And the chief pleasure potency is Radharani.
When these expansions descend or manifest they come to show the spiritual variety or to save fallen souls in a special way fitting for that avatara and mission. The Fish avatara to save in a flood, kurma– the Transcendental tortoise to be a pivot etc.
These expansions also have no need of matter, the inferior energy to enrich themselves. They will enjoy more and more even when here, because they are always spiritual and in the spiritual world.
43. (S): Through these visions, God incarnates into various different forms, and the living being chooses to exist in a particular type of existence.
44. (T): This you can say for the spiritual world; the many expansions there are to enjoy with various types of servants. There is no need for avatara= descent; he can have those lilas up there.
He can pick up jivas from here who may like that particular form of the Lord to serve forever. That may have been their svarupa– service form, before they fell here. But one can sometimes change svarupa. Srila Prabhupada say so:
“Some devotee wants to serve Krishna as flower; they become flower there. If I want that "As a flower I shall lie down at the lotus feet of Krishna," he becomes flower, voluntarily. And he can change his..., from flower to human body. That is spiritual life. There is no restriction. If some devotee wants to serve Krishna as cow, he serves Krishna as cow, as calf, as flower, as plant, as water, as ground, field, or as father, as mother, as friend, as beloved, anything. Ye yatha mam prapadyante tams tathaiva bhajamy aham [Bg. 4.11]. That is Krishna's all-powerfulness, spiritual life.” (Srimad-Bhagavatam 6.1.1-4, Melbourne, May 20, 1975)
This is in Brhad Bhagavatamrta 2.4. 139-146
“Sri Narada said: Don’t think that the flocks of animals and birds of this place, or the trees, creepers, bushes, grass, and other vegetation, are made from earth like ordinary creatures in the mode of ignorance.
In Vaikuntha Gopa-kumara saw many animals like cows, horses, and elephants; birds like doves and cuckoos; trees, bushes, and creepers like mandaras and kundas; and seemingly inauspicious creatures like insects and worms. He would have been wrong to think that these were inferior living beings, born into bodies covered by the mode of ignorance. They were not degraded like the living beings of the material world that assume bodies made of the element earth.
In fact these are all personal associates of Sri Krishna, all with spiritual sac-cid-ananda bodies. They have assumed such forms to taste the ecstasy of serving the Lord in various ways.
These Vaikuntha-vasis choose to play such roles as animals and birds to increase the variety of Lord Narayana’s pleasure. And they also want to share in that pleasure. Thus the birds, bees, trees, and creepers described by Lord Brahma in the Third Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam when he tells of his own experience of Vaikuntha are not ignorant creatures like the corresponding species of life in the material world.
They have assumed forms with colors and shapes similar to those of the Lord they have worshiped as most dear.
This verse indicates that Vaikuntha devotees who appear in nonhuman forms, such as those of some animal or plant, have worshiped similar forms of Lord Narayana, who by His expansion appeared in those same species. These devotees, each in his own way, have realized the perfection of sarupya, having attained forms that look just like those of the Supreme Lord.
Having each attained sameness with a particular form of the Lord, they have gained the opulences of various kinds of bodies, as sages, demigods, fish, tortoises, human beings, and mystic seers.
Some have become hogs, man-lions, or dwarfs, and some have three eyes, four arms—or thousands of eyes like the Mahapurusha.
Some have assumed bodies with thousands of faces, or with features like such deities as the gods of air and fire. Some have four arms, or eight, or twelve or more, and various kinds of dress, ornaments, symbols, and other attributes.
Srimad-Bhagavatam (2.9.11–12) describes the residents of Vaikuntha as appearing similar to the Supreme Lord and having varied bodily colors:
 “The inhabitants of the Vaikuntha planets have a glowing sky-bluish complexion. Their eyes resemble lotus flowers, their dress is of yellowish color, and their bodily features are very attractive. They are just the age of growing youths. They all have four hands, they are nicely decorated with pearl necklaces with ornamental medallions, and they all appear effulgent. Some are like coral, diamonds, or white lotus fibers in complexion. On their heads and necks they have garlands, and they wear shining earrings.”
In texts 144 through 147, Narada depicts in some detail this variety of bodily form, dress, and so on. Some Vaikuntha devotees appear as human beings because of having attained sarupya—likeness in form—with such incarnations of the Lord as Sri Raghunatha. Others appear as munis by sarupya with sage incarnations like Sri Kapiladeva, or as demigods by sarupya with manvantara-avataras like Lord Satyasena and Lord Vibhu. Others appear as rishis by sarupya with incarnations like Sri Parasurama, or as fish by sarupya with Lord Matsya, or tortoises with Lord Kurma. Some, who worship Siva or Brahma as a representative of the Supreme, appear in bodies with three eyes or four heads. Some appear like Indra with a thousand eyes, like Ananta Sesha with thousands of heads, or like Surya or other demigods. Vedic scriptures like the aindra-srutis, the mantras glorifying Indra, support such worship of demigods as representatives of the Supreme Lord. In the Fifth Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam we also find demigods like Surya being worshiped as representatives of the Lord in Plaksha-dvipa and the other divisions of the Bhur-loka planetary system.
The only means to achieve entrance into Vaikuntha is pure, exclusive love for the lotus feet of the Supreme Lord. Ordinary demigod worshipers are never eligible to become residents of Vaikuntha, but worshipers who regard Siva and other demigods as nondifferent from Lord Vishnu achieve special Vaishnava perfection. As the Vamana Purana and other scriptures describe, those devotees join the exalted associates of the Supreme Lord they worship, either on the respective planets of the demigod representatives of the Lord or, in some cases, on a Vaikuntha planet, where the devotees are endowed with the special opulences of those demigods.
The Vaikuntha-vasis whose bodies are just like the transcendental body of the Mahapurusha, the first incarnation of Lord Vishnu for material creation, are those who have achieved sarupya by worshiping Him. They have thousands of arms, legs, heads, and other limbs. In Text 144 the word adi (“and so on”) occurs twice. The first time, it indicates that some devotees in Vaikuntha assume bodies that resemble those of yet other demigods, like Yamaraja and Aryama, who are material representatives of various personal powers of the Supreme Lord. The second time, adi indicates that besides the usual four arms, some Vaikuntha devotees have eight arms, twelve arms, or more.
Whoever comes to Vaikuntha realizes the very same service to the lotus feet of Krishna for which he had developed a taste by the end of his material life, and he realizes that service in full detail, with its dress, form, and so on, for each mood of devotion is dear to the Personality of Godhead and each gives pleasure to the devotee absorbed in it.
The bodies of some Vaikuntha residents resemble those of sages and other humans—or monkeys, demons, or whatever—but do not resemble any of the human-like or sage-like forms of the Lord, such as Lord Ramacandra or Kapiladeva, nor any expansion or incarnation the Lord accepts in other species. The unusual forms that some Vaikuntha devotees accept are explained in the current two verses. While practising devotional service in their previous material lives, those devotees neared the perfection of love of God and so began to display symptoms of that perfection. Those devotees varied in their individual moods, or rasas, and varied accordingly in the forms of the Lord upon which their devotion focused. And when those devotees achieved Vaikuntha they brought with them their individual rasas. In each case, no matter how unusual the form of devotion was, it gave pleasure to the Supreme Lord. Because those individual moods pleased the Lord, they were attractive also to the devotees expressing them, who therefore did not want to give them up. When the Supreme Lord so desires, some of His devotees imitate the mundane activities of Indra, Candra, and other demigods—even in Vaikuntha. After all, everything that exists can be found in Vaikuntha in a purified form.”
- But, again, there is no need of descending for this.
45. (S): The svarupa is the subtlest of these bodies and represents the basic vision or personality that the living being wants to express and know itself as. This svarupa initially develops into the subtle body of activity comprising of senses, mind, intelligence, ego and consciousness, and then into the gross body comprising of organs and other bodily systems such as ingestion, digestion, circulation, elimination, etc.
46. (T): The svarupa was in the spiritual world, fully developed, in harmony with the lila of Krsna.
Due to envy of Krsna the soul fell to the material world, where it gets subtle and gross bodies.
These are prison-suits, not to develop his svarupa further as a pastime in a pleasure excursion, but to get back and revive its svarupa, which is contracted in a seed form, clothed in the subtle and gross bodies.
47. (S): The creation is God’s attempt at knowledge and expression.
48. (T): When the creation is again spiritualized, then he can firther unfold His pastimes here, and have a prema-yuga, age of love, here. Still that will be temporary, and it was not the original intent of the prison-house of matter.
49.  (S): These bodies are developed based upon different svarupa.
50. (T): They are perversions of the svarupa.
51. (S): That would include the subtle svarupa or archetype that we model our lives after.
52. (T): Once we get spiritual knowledge, we model based on our nitya-svarupa, eternal service form.
53. (S): Living beings adopt these forms of creation as their personality, and the subtle and gross bodies are developed from this personality.
54. (T): The false ego personality is part of the subtle material body. It is a covering of the svarupa, not a part of the svarupa.
55. (S): The fundamental categories of reality are not particles, or space or motion of particles in space. The fundamental categories are the six values – knowledge, beauty, wealth, fame, power and renunciation. The evolution of the universe is the evolution of knowledge, beauty, wealth, fame, power and renunciation. This in turn implies that gross matter must be described in terms of semantic categories like knowledge and beauty, and not as material particles in motion.
56. (T): The paramanus– ultimate particles or atoms *are* the substrate of the gunas or values of aisvarya virya sri  etc. knowledge, beauty, wealth, fame, power and renunciation. Particles are fundamental or substrate.
57. (S): Prior to creation, God exists as the fullness of the six values. At this time, He holds a self-image which hasn’t yet been externalized.
58. (T): Never He will have the one of Hegel.
 If he has the six aisvaryas in full what is unfulfilled, only to increase these six more and more.
And they have already externalized; in the spiritual world. The only self-image He can have of expanding the lila can only be done in spirit, since matter is the lower energy, despicable, to be renounced.
“Besides these, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is another, superior energy of Mine.” (BG 7.5)
- You could say He creates the material world so the jivas will again recognize his superiority in wealth beauty etc -sad aisvaryas. His self image is not yet established in the fallen jivas; should be re-established in them. Some of His tatastha (jivas– souls) potential is not realized yet (Maslow self-actualization, the need to “realize one’s potential”). The creation of matter is to bring back His tatastha potencies.
But not that He has a deficiency; the material world is too small and low quality to be of anything important for him. What can this rotting spot in the infinity do for Him.
The spiritual world is unlimited. The material world is a limited area. It is like a cloud in the spiritual sky which gets regularly wound up and rolled out by Maha-Vishnu. If it would be unlimited how He could do that.
59. (S): Before God creates the world, He engages in the thinking process of what He wants to be.
60. (T): To be again God for the fallen demons in matter.
61. (S): Innovative ideas about how God should realize Himself as some combination of the six values, held internally as a self-image.
62. (T): Matter is not a big endeavor; it is every 2 x 311.04 X  10^12  year again the same. Therefore he has a sleeping expansion doing the boring same old story.
63. (S): At the time of the creation, the collection of all individual tendencies—the cosmic prakrti, material energy—develops God’s thoughts into feelings… The cosmic prakrti determines in God which schemes of self-actualization are going to proceed to the next stage of manifestation. In a sense, prakrti helps God develop His thoughts into His feelings or desires. God actually never desires the material creation, in a positive sense. Rather, the material prakrti is everything that God doesn’t want. In a sense, prakrti is God’s revulsions, and it “stands behind” God, as the kinds of things towards which God has turned His back.
64. (T): Interesting to split it up like that. In reality it is an almost mechanical routine process; just like suppose there was a war and the prison-house is bombed to dust. Will the king put a palace architect/ building company to put up some concrete and steel. Will he put his best cooks in the prison kitchen to make their food: bread with spiders ( I heard in kindergarten).
65. (S): Prakrti helps God develop His thoughts into His feelings or desires.
66. (T): As if he every creation makes something special and new. It is saidin one purana that every creation is the same, except 25 insignificant details.
67. (S): Cosmic intelligence or mahat-tattva, matter in its manifest first form, arises from prakrti and aids in the development of will. Just as individual intelligence helps progress an individual’s desire into a will, the mahat-tattva plays a supporting role in developing God’s desires into His determination.
68. (T): As if mahat-tattva is an external agent or advisor to God. Actually,  mahat-tattva comes because prakrti or primordial unmanifested matter, in which the modes of nature are neutralized, is driven/operated by God. Matter without His force/ will/intelligence is lifeless paramanus, atoms or pradhana; atoms with the gunas in equilibrium, unmanifest invisible matter.
Mahat-tattva is the stage of matter when time has entered.
69. (S): Cosmic intelligence then determines in God the knowledge of moral principles– dharma– under whose influence He carries out creation.
70. (T): The mahat of God and the rta/ dharma of God are different functions in God.
Within or along with mahat is the rta.
71. (S): Cosmic ahankara is that which develops God’s will into knowledge of procedures about how to create.
72. (T): Ahankara is the sad-aisvaryas of a person or expansion of God. Cosmic ahankara according to Srimad Bhagavatam 3.26.23-29  is a transformation of mahat-tattva.
The sattva, raja, tamah divisions of this ahankara manifest or transform into buddhi-intelligence, manah– mind, senses,  bhutas– material elements, tan-matras– sense-objects. Your cosmic ahankara is partial. Which scripture you use?
Anyhow if you wish this usage then ‘’ Cosmic ahankara is that which develops God’s will into knowledge of procedures about how to create.’’, should be “cosmic ahankara is an instrument of God’s will to create”. God has no ahankara or false ego as part of His Divine Personality.
73. (S): God isn’t constrained by karma and His powers are never increased nor depleted.
74. (T): Increase you must delete. He is always newer and newer, and never static. There may be unlimited emanations from the Supreme Personality of Godhead (janmady asya yatah [SB 1.1.1]), but He always remains complete (purnasya purnam adaya purnam evavasishyate [Iso Invocation]). In our experience in the material world, if we have a bank balance of one million dollars, as we withdraw money from the bank the balance gradually diminishes until it becomes nil. However, the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, is so complete that although innumerable Personalities of Godhead expand from Him, He remains the same Supreme Personality of Godhead. Purnasya purnam adaya purnam evavasishyate. Therefore He is the wonderful cause. Govindam adi-purusham tam aham bhajami.
"Krishna, who is known as Govinda, is the supreme controller. He has an eternal, blissful, spiritual body. He is the origin of all. He has no other origin, for He is the prime cause of all causes." (Bs. 5.1)
Even in this material world, we can understand that the sun has existed for millions of years and has given off heat and light since its creation, yet the sun still retains its power and never changes. What then is to be said of the supreme cause, param brahma, Krishna? Everything emanates from Him perpetually, yet He maintains His original form (sac-cid-ananda-vigrahah). Krishna personally says in Bhagavad-gita (10.8), mattah sarvam pravartate: "Everything emanates from Me." Everything emanates from Krishna eternally, yet He is the same Krishna and does not change or empties.
(SB 8.3.15 p.)
75. (S): The temptation could be interpreted as the ‘original sin’ in the Biblical sense due to which Adam enters the forest of the material world to eat the ‘forbidden fruit’ of pleasure and is entangled and condemned to live there forever. Yet it must be noted that a living being is tempted to act in this way because of its native aversion towards God.
76. (T): But originally– native-the soul didn’t have this.
“The original home of the living entity and the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the spiritual world. In the spiritual world both the Lord and the living entities live together very peacefully. Since the living entity remains engaged in the service of the Lord, they both share a blissful life in the spiritual world. However, when the living entity wants to enjoy himself, he falls down into the material world. “  SB 4.28.54
- Adam didn’t have this native. He was in paradise, pure. Then he fell from grace.
- “Every living entity has an eternal spiritual body, which exists before he takes on a material body. As we said, entering the material body is a kind of punishment. Every soul is eternally part and parcel of God, but because of some sinful activity, the living entity comes into this material world. In the Bible it is said that due to disobedience to God, Adam and Eve lost paradise and had to come into the material world. The soul belongs to the paradise in heaven—the planets of Krishna.“
- I.o.w. we are not eternally revolving in matter. We started in Krsna’s lila.
77. (S): Matter is not a substance, an individual thing, or even reality. Matter is just phenomena, on similar footing with sensations and concepts, although more objectivized than sensations and concepts. Sensations and concepts are defined in relation to an observer’s senses and mind, but matter can also be defined in relation to other objects. This constitutes the basis of current theories of science that are formulated in terms of physical properties measured against other objects. But, unlike science that treats these objects as real, this is not so. Material objects are not immutable, unchanging things because objects are created and destroyed. Even fundamental objects are known to be spontaneously created and destroyed from the energy field in atomic theory. Matter is therefore not reality. Matter is a phenomenon like sensations.
Then what is reality? Only consciousness is real, as it is immutable and unchanging. It is real because it is never created and will never be destroyed, it always exists individuated, and the individuality of consciousness never changes. Consciousness creates phenomena through choices but the person or individual underlying those phenomena remains unchanged. Sensations, concepts and body are all phenomena in this view; the senses are produced from the mind and the body is further produced from the senses. The body is also the experience of consciousness, and it is therefore just like a sensation or a concept, although more objectified.
78. (T): Paramanus are real and eternal.
“The material manifestation's ultimate particle, which is indivisible and not formed into a body, is called the atom. It exists always as an invisible identity, even after the dissolution of all forms. The material body is but a combination of such atoms, but it is misunderstood by the common man.”
(SB 3.11.1)
79. (S): The capabilities in consciousness would far exceed the ones in matter, then there would be some meanings that we could never know and express through matter.
80. (T): That is true, they exceed. Consciousness belongs to the realm of the spiritual energy, where it can fully know itself and express itself.
Conditioned or fallen consciousness is meant to become frustrated in expressing itself – which is pursuing demoniac, non-godly plans in matter.
But matter can turn into spirit again, and one can live self-realized even in this world.
81. (S): A difference in the native capabilities of matter and consciousness would limit or hinder the purpose for the existence of matter in the first place, namely to facilitate self-knowledge and self-expression.
82. (T): This world is perfect, just as the prison is a natural or perfect part of a kingdom.
Imperfect from the short term view of the prisoner, perfect from the viewpoint of the king.
83. (S): The classic design argument often fails in the face of adaptation: Why are living beings adapting to environments if God created everything perfectly at the start of creation?
84. (T): The Veda has this argument: the prison of matter is not meant to be perfect.
   We are rebel souls, put out of heaven.
Prana-vayu is part of this argument. Prana-vayu is “…..how consciousness and God actually control material objects” to create and maintain the prison.
We are not just ‘naturalists’ but ‘Krsnaturalists’.
85. (S): The three modes mutate and combine over and over to create an infinite variety, but in each case one of the modes predominates over the other two modes. Owing to this domination, it is possible to see each type of existence, activity and pleasure as primarily governed by one mode.
86. (T): Infinite variety is not possible because the material world is finite. Bhagavad sandarbha Anuccheda 10.
Lord Siva explains (Padma Purana, Uttara-khanda 255.56.59):
19 “My dear Parvati, you have just heard about the opulences of the material energy, now hear about the supreme opulences of the spiritual world, which comprises the spiritual quarters of all existence– Parabrahman-God, Brahman– His effulgence, Tatastha– the saktis or subordinate living entities.
20 “Produced from the perspiration of the Personality of Godhead, whose limbs are all the Vedic literatures, the auspicious Viraja River flows on the boundary that separates the material energy from the spiritual sky.
21 “On the farther shore of the Viraja River is the spiritual sky. In that spiritual sky I the abode of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. That abode is eternal, imperishable, unlimited, effulgent, transcendental, and full of nectar. That abode is made of the transcendental energy known as the mode of pure goodness (suddha-sattva).” (Brahma samhita purport to 5.6)
- “The sole potency of Krsna which is spiritual, functioning as Krsna's own proper power, has manifested His pastimes of Goloka or Gokula. By her grace individual souls who are constituents of the marginal potency can have admission into even those pastimes. The deluding energy, who is of the nature of the perverted reflection of the spiritual (cit) potency, has got her location on the other side of the river Viraja, which surrounds the Brahma-dhama forming the boundary of Maha-Vaikuntha as the outer envelope of Goloka. The position of Goloka being absolutely unalloyed with the mundane, deluding energy, far from having any association with Krsna, feels ashamed to appear before His view.” If the material world would be unlimited, it would pervade the spiritual world with its unwholesomeness, but bhagavatam says there is no modes of nature in the Spiritual World. If the material world would be unlimited, then there would be unlimited souls in the material world. But there are no unlimited souls in the material world, only a few. Why would the spiritual world need an unlimitedly big prison= Durga, the citadel of DurgA. There are only a few rascals to be kicked out of the spiritual world, to the material world. If the amount of rebellious souls is unlimited, God made a mistake in expanding them; He has caused unlimited suffering. There are innumerable spiritual living entities. And some of them, those who are not fit to live in that spiritual world, they are sent to this material world. The same idea is expressed in Milton's Paradise Lost. So we, all conditioned souls, we are practically living in a place after Paradise Lost. According to the Skanda Purana (2.2.27), there are 35 million universes in the material world. In SB 10.3.25 it says:
“After millions of years, at the time of cosmic annihilation, when everything, manifested and unmanifested, is annihilated by the force of time, the five gross elements enter into the subtle conception, and the manifested categories enter into the unmanifested substance. At that time, You alone remain, and You are known as Ananta Sesa-naga. ” Purport: “After many millions of years, when Lord Brahma comes to the end of his life, the annihilation of the cosmic manifestation takes place. At that time the five elements—namely earth, water, fire, air and ether—enter into the mahat-tattva. The mahat-tattva again enters, by the force of time, into the non-manifested total material energy, the total material energy enters into the energetic pradhana, and the pradhana enters into You. Therefore after the annihilation of the whole cosmic manifestation, You alone remain with Your transcendental name, form, quality and paraphernalia.”
If the material world is literally unlimited how Maha-Visnu can expand and take it in again every 6.22 trillion years. Prisons are always a very small part of the whole state.
87. (S): The Vedas urge us to rise through these modes—from ignorance to passion to goodness—
88. (T): You can skip raja and sattva if you are in tama and go directly to suddha-sattva.
 If in raja you also don’t have to go through sattva.
Prabhupada: …Goodness helps. Even if he's not in goodness... That, just like all these European and Americans. They were not in goodness. They were on the platform of ignorance. But still, they, because they took it, therefore they are coming, progressively.
Devotee: Krishna says you can understand all behavior in terms of the modes of nature, the three modes. I'm trying to understand why...
Prabhupada: That is generally. Unless one becomes in goodness... But bhakti-marga is transcendental. It does not depend on the qualities of this material nature. Ahaituki apratihata. Nothing can check bhakti-marga. Even one is in the platform of ignorance, it cannot check. Because it is purely spiritual. It does not depend on material conditions. These goodness, passion, ignorance, they are material conditions. So bhakti does not depend on material conditions.
Devotee: Why is it then, that one person accepts it and another rejects it?
Prabhupada: That is his choice.
Devotee: That is from a spiritual position, his basic disposition?
Prabhupada: That is his choice, yes. We have got this independence, to accept or not to accept.
89. (S): At any given time, one of the modes predominates while the other two become subordinate.
90. (T): This is different in pradhana where the 3 gunas are withdrawn, inert and therefore in balance.
91. (S): The knower aspect becomes the essence of the universe, and the meanings known in creation are the meanings that God wants to know Himself as.
92. (T): Which aspect of God can seek cit– knowledge and ananda– happiness in this rotting matter.
“You have to go back to home, go back to Krishna, and there is your real life. Krishna comes therefore. He displays His rasa dance in Vrindavana to attract these fallen souls, that "If you want enjoyment, why not come back to Me? Here is the eternal enjoyment. Why you are rotting in this material world and becoming implicated, sometimes as Brahma and sometime as the worm in the stool, desiring varieties of inferior enjoyment. Why? Why you are so… become fool?"” (Hyderabad, April 23, 1974, Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.2.9)
The material world is dictionary of spiritual world but that is making the best use of a bad bargain since it is a rippled edition, not meant to expand His glories.
93. (S): In a similar fashion, the form of God is reflected in matter and while this form is eternal, Time causes matter to churn like ripples in water.
94. (T): Then you get the virat-purusa– the Universal Form , who Arjuna in the Bhagavad-Gita didn’t like to see for long.
So God also has no pleasure in revealing it.
“You have been perturbed and bewildered by seeing this horrible feature of Mine. Now let it be finished. My devotee, be free again from all disturbances. With a peaceful mind you can now see the form you desire.”
A devotee is not much interested in the universal form, for it does not enable one to reciprocate loving feelings. (Bg 11.49)
When Arjuna thus saw Krishna in His original form, he said: O Janardana, seeing this humanlike form, so very beautiful, I am now composed in mind, and I am restored to my original nature.  (Bg 11.51)
the universal form which Krishna showed to Arjuna is not the original form of God. The original is the Krishna form. The universal form, with its thousands and thousands of heads and hands, is manifest just to draw the attention of those who have no love for God. amongst the devotees there was no necessity of showing it. That form was exhibited by Krishna at the request of Arjuna so that in the future, when one represents himself as an incarnation of God, people can ask to see his universal form. (Bg 11.54)
95. (S): Time determines what will happen in the universe but not who will do it. Consciousness, with its unconscious tendencies, karma, ego, mind, intelligence and senses, determines whether it wants to participate in the events preordained by Time. The events in the universe are fixed, but their doers are not fixed. Events, as we see them in the universe, will happen regardless of whether a particular individual participates in them. However, the decision to participate in those events makes the consciousness responsible for them.
96. (T): Not so, Kala, Time, determines the particulars for that jiva, which has its specific course in the grinding wheel of kala, according to its specific personality.
97. (S): The controller form of God is considered the first emanation of the enjoyer form. While both enjoyer and controller forms are supreme, the Vedas treat the enjoyer form to be the original form, and the controller form to be a subordinate manifestation of the original need to enjoy. The controller form emerges as consequence of the need in God to know and enjoy.
98. (T): Paramatma – the 3 Gods Immanent are not lila-avatara, these 3 are the 3 purusa-avataras , see:
Caitanya caritamrta madhya 20.244-246
- “The first personal expansion is Sankarshana, and the others are incarnations like the fish incarnation. Sankarshana expands as the Purusha, or Vishnu. The incarnations such as Matsya, the fish incarnation, appear in different yugas for specific pastimes.
PURPORT
The purusha-avataras are the Lords of the universal creation. These are Karanodakasayi Vishnu, Garbhodakasayi Vishnu and Kshirodakasayi Vishnu. There are also lila-avataras, and these include (1) Catuhsana, or the four Kumaras, (2) Narada, (3) Varaha, (4) Matsya, (5) Yajna, (6) Nara-Narayana, (7) Kardami Kapila, (8) Dattatreya, (9) Hayasirsha, (10) Hamsa, (11) Dhruvapriya, or Prisnigarbha, (12) Rishabha, (13) Prithu, (14) Nrisimha, (15) Kurma, (16) Dhanvantari, (17) Mohini, (18) Vamana, (19) Bhargava Parasurama, (20) Raghavendra, (21) Vyasa, (22) Pralambari Balarama, (23) Krishna, (24) Buddha and (25) Kalki.
These twenty-five Personalities of Godhead are known as lila-avataras. Because they appear in each day of Brahma, or in each kalpa (millennium), they are sometimes known as kalpa-avataras. Of these incarnations, Hamsa and Mohini are neither permanent nor very well known, but They are listed among the prabhava-avataras. Kapila, Dattatreya, Rishabha, Dhanvantari and Vyasa are eternally situated and very widely known. They are also counted among the prabhava incarnations. Kurma, Matsya, Narayana, Varaha, Hayagriva, Prisnigarbha and Baladeva, the killer of Pralambasura, are counted among the vaibhava-avataras.
Madhya 20.245
 “There are six types of incarnations [avataras] of Krishna. One comprises the incarnations of Vishnu [purusha-avataras], and another comprises the incarnations meant for the performance of pastimes [lila-avataras].
 “There are incarnations that control the material qualities [guna-avataras], incarnations associated with the reign of each Manu [manvantara-avataras], incarnations in different millenniums [yuga-avataras] and incarnations of empowered living entities [saktyavesa-avataras].
The guna-avataras are three—Lord Brahma, Lord Siva and Lord Vishnu (SB 10.88.3). The avataras associated with the reign of each Manu, known as manvantara-avataras, are listed as follows in Srimad-Bhagavatam (Eighth Canto, chapters 1, 5 and 13): (1) Yajna, (2) Vibhu, (3) Satyasena, (4) Hari, (5) Vaikuntha, (6) Ajita, (7) Vamana, (8) Sarvabhauma, (9) Rishabha, (10) Vishvaksena, (11) Dharmasetu, (12) Sudhama, (13) Yogesvara and (14) Brihadbhanu. All together these are fourteen in number, and of these, Yajna and Vamana are also counted among the lila-avataras. All these manvantara incarnations are sometimes called vaibhava-avataras.
The four yuga-avataras are (1) sukla (white) in Satya-yuga (SB 11.5.21), (2) rakta (red) in Treta-yuga (SB 11.5.24), (3) syama (dark blue) in Dvapara-yuga (SB 11.5.27) and (4) generally krishna (black) but in special cases pita (yellow) as Caitanya Mahaprabhu in Kali-yuga (SB 11.5.32 and 10.8.13).
The saktyavesa-avataras are categorized into (1) forms of divine absorption (bhagavad-avesa), such as Kapiladeva or Rishabhadeva, and (2) divinely empowered forms (saktyavesa), of whom seven are foremost: (1) Sesha Naga in the Vaikuntha world, empowered for the personal service of the Supreme Lord (sva-sevana-sakti), (2) Anantadeva, empowered to bear all the planets within the universe (bhu-dharana-sakti), (3) Lord Brahma, empowered with the energy to create the cosmic manifestation (srishti-sakti), (4) Catuhsana, or the Kumaras, specifically empowered to distribute transcendental knowledge (jnana-sakti), (5) Narada Muni, empowered to distribute devotional service (bhakti-sakti), (6) Maharaja Prithu, specifically empowered to rule and maintain the living entities (palana-sakti) and (7) Parasurama, specifically empowered to cut down rogues and demons (dushta-damana-sakti).
b. Arjuna and Krishna found Visnu enjoying in a palace in the causal ocean. But He was not enjoying matter.
SB 10.90.52: From that region they entered a body of water resplendent with huge waves being churned by a mighty wind. Within that ocean Arjuna saw an amazing palace more radiant than anything he had ever seen before. Its beauty was enhanced by thousands of ornamental pillars bedecked with brilliant gems.
SB 10.89.53: In that palace was the huge, awe-inspiring serpent Ananta Sesha. He shone brilliantly with the radiance emanating from the gems on His thousands of hoods and reflecting from twice as many fearsome eyes. He resembled white Mount Kailasa, and His necks and tongues were dark blue.
SB 10.89.54-56: Arjuna then saw the omnipresent and omnipotent Supreme Personality of Godhead, Maha-vishnu, sitting at ease on the serpent bed. His bluish complexion was the color of a dense raincloud, He wore a beautiful yellow garment, His face looked charming, His broad eyes were most attractive, and He had eight long, handsome arms. His profuse locks of hair were bathed on all sides in the brilliance reflected from the clusters of precious jewels decorating His crown and earrings. He wore the Kaustubha gem, the mark of Srivatsa and a garland of forest flowers. Serving that topmost of all Lords were His personal attendants, headed by Sunanda and Nanda; His cakra and other weapons in their personified forms; His consort potencies Pushti, Sri, Kirti and Aja; and all His various mystic powers.
The Lord has innumerable energies, and they were also standing there personified. The most important among them were as follows: Pushti, the energy for nourishment; Sri, the energy of beauty; Kirti, the energy of reputation; and Aja, the energy of material creation. All these energies are invested in the administrators of the material world, namely Lord Brahma, Lord Siva and Lord Vishnu, and in the kings of the heavenly planets, Indra, Candra, Varuna and the sungod. In other words, all these demigods, being empowered by the Lord with certain energies, engage in the transcendental loving service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Laghu Bhagavatamrta 1.2.6 states that Visnu doesn’t touch maya; she is Siva’s wive. Visnu does the creation by His will. He enters the universe but doesn’t touch it by the power of his acintya-sakti.
Even His glance to impregnate the jivas is by the entering and expanding of Sambhu, and is thus factually done by Siva, see Brahma Samhita t 7-10.
The Purusa-Avataras have some maya-gandha = scent, but actually no maya-sparsa = connection; how can you say they become self actualized and gratified by matter.
CC adi 2. 52-55: “Superficially we see that these purushas have a relationship with maya, but above them, in the fourth dimension, is Lord Krishna, who has no contact with the material energy.
PURPORT
The three purushas—Karanodakasayi Vishnu, Garbhodakasayi Vishnu and Kshirodakasayi Vishnu—all have a relationship with the material energy, called maya, because through maya They create the material cosmos. These three purushas, who lie on the Karana, Garbha and Kshira oceans respectively, are the Supersoul of everything that be: Karanodakasayi Vishnu is the Supersoul of the collective universes, Garbhodakasayi Vishnu is the Supersoul of the collective living beings, and Kshirodakasayi Vishnu is the Supersoul of all individual living entities. Because all of Them are somehow attracted to the affairs of the material energy, They can be said to have some affection for maya. But the transcendental position of Sri Krishna Himself is not even slightly tinged by maya. His transcendental state is called turiya, or the fourth-dimensional stage.
Adi 2.53:  “‘In the material world the Lord is designated as virat, hiranyagarbha and karana. But beyond these three designations, the Lord is ultimately in the fourth dimension.’
Virat (the phenomenal manifestation of the Supreme Whole), hiranyagarbha (the numinous soul of everything), and karana (the cause, or causal nature) are all but designations of the purushas, who are responsible for material creation. The transcendental position surpasses these designations and is therefore called turiya, the position of the fourth dimension. This is a quotation from Sridhara Svami’s commentary on the Eleventh Canto, Fifteenth Chapter, verse 16, of Srimad-Bhagavatam.
Adi 2.54: “Although these three features of the Lord deal directly with the material energy, none of Them are touched by it. They are all beyond illusion.
 “‘This is the opulence of the Lord: Although situated in the material nature, He is never affected by the modes of nature. Similarly, those who have surrendered to Him and fixed their intelligence upon Him are not influenced by the modes of nature.’
This text is from Srimad-Bhagavatam (1.11.38). Those who have taken shelter of the lotus feet of the Personality of Godhead do not identify with the material world, even while living in it. Pure devotees may deal with the three modes of material nature, but because of their transcendental intelligence in Krishna consciousness, they are not influenced by the material qualities. The spell of material activities does not attract such devotees. Therefore, the Supreme Lord and His devotees acting under Him are always free from material contamination.”
- The creation is done in yoga-nidra transcendental sleep; without real interest, as duty, thankless task.
- “The Lord does not desire that a living being be illusioned by external energy. The external energy is aware of this fact, but still she accepts a thankless task of keeping the forgotten soul under illusion by her bewildering influence. The Lord does not interfere with the task of the illusory energy because such performances of the illusory energy are also necessary for reformation of the conditioned soul. An affectionate father does not like his children to be chastised by another agent, yet he puts his disobedient children under the custody of a severe man just to bring them to order. But the all-affectionate Almighty Father at the same time desires relief for the conditioned soul, relief from the clutches of the illusory energy. The king puts the disobedient citizens within the walls of the jail, but sometimes the king, desiring the prisoners' relief, personally goes there and pleads for reformation, and on his doing so the prisoners are set free. Similarly, the Supreme Lord descends from His kingdom upon the kingdom of the illusory energy and personally gives relief in the form of the Bhagavad-gita, wherein He personally suggests that although the ways of the illusory energy are very stiff to overcome, one who surrenders unto the lotus feet of the Lord is set free by the order of the Supreme.” (SB 1.7.5)
99. (S): The controller form of God controls all experiences—including those of the enjoyer form of God.
100. (T): Siva never controls Visnu, unless Visnu allows His devotee, Siva to lord it over. This would only be to enjoy lila– but that is temporary, not on principle or as a principle.
And first of all, Visnu will not enjoy Sivas wive, Durga and her energy.
101. (S): The truth is that Śiva is the supreme controller and Vinu is the supreme enjoyer.
102. (T): Siva controls by the anumanta, permission and power of Visnu.
Thus “The truth is that Śiva is the subordinate controller, under Visnu and Visnu is the supreme enjoyer” or “The truth is that Śiva is the supreme controller in the material universe, appointed and empowered by Visnu and Visnu is the supreme controller and enjoyer”. Siva is Maha-deva for the material realm, Visnu is the Adi-deva.
103. (S): Their energies are called by different names. The energy of the Vinu form is called prakti…Śakti,on the other hand, is the combination of three modes of nature that are controlled by the consciousness in the controller form of God.
104. (T): Prakrti is also controlled by Siva, this is just established in your text also “the controller form of God controls all experiences—including those of the enjoyer form of God.”
105. (S): Prakrti is a name for the combination of six causes, which are the aspects of the knowing and enjoying form of God into the ‘mirror’ of material nature. Śakti, on the other hand, is the combination of three modes of nature that are controlled by the consciousness in the controller form of God. They are sometimes regarded as different energies and sometimes as aspects of the same energy.
106. (T): The different names you get as different views on the same object.
Sakti is energy of the Saktiman, the energetic, who is controlling the sakti.
Prakrti is property of and enjoyed by the purusa = enjoyer.
Prakrti is also connected to the modes.
“The living entity in material nature thus follows the ways of life, enjoying the three modes of nature. This is due to his association with that material nature. Thus he meets with good and evil among various species.” (BG 13.21)
-- prakriti = great product, great action, the great flow, making or placing before or at first, the original or natural form or condition of anything , original or primary substance (opp. to vi-kRti), cause original source,  origin, nature , character , constitution , temper , disposition, fundamental form , pattern , standard , model, the original producer of (or rather passive power of creating) the material world (consisting of 3 constituent essences or Gunas called sattva, rajas, tamas) , Nature (distinguished from puruSa, Spirit, the 8 producers or primary essences which evolve the whole visible world, a goddess , the personified will of the Supreme in the creation (hence the same with the Sakti or personified energy or wife of a deity , as Laksmi, Durga &c. ; also considered as identical with the Supreme Being).
-- Sakti = abilit, energy [power], strength, might, energy or active power of a deity personified as his wife and worshipped by the zAkta sect of Hindus under various names, capability.        
-- purusa = human being, Supreme Being or Soul of the universe, male, person, soul, spirit, personal and animating principle in men and other beings, Spirit as passive and a spectator of the prakRti or creative force, primeval man as the soul and original source of the universe, men.
107. (S): We assume that the ‘real’ person is different from the guises he wears and the roles he plays, but that is not the case for God. The forms of God are different complementary moods or personalities that exist in the same Supreme Person and He manifests them as different individuals with different forms although all at the same time.
108. The real person is Krishna. All others are amsa, expansion/ emanation and kala (amsa of the amsa) or even further amsas, displaying PARTIALLY Krsna’s glory. They are Krishna in disguise and partially manifesting. Narayana or Visnu is God ruling from His palace in the spiritual world and God immanent. Krishna is the original source of all these expansions residing in the palace gardens or the holy resorts of the Spiritual Kingdom, as the kings of our world have their palace and governing offices but their relaxation and pleasure is away from the public and the management in the loving friendship with his family in some heavenly rural paradise.
The Purusa-avataras are (for) G-O-D  Generating Operating Destroying the material world.
The Lila-avataras also have Their abodes in the spiritual world for the relationship and lila with various types of worshipers.
If you only wish to state about the material realm this ’complementing’ is ok. But then you have to de-head your analogy. You should here introduce transcendence.
109. (S): The first feature of śakti is called māya-śakti.
110.  (T): 3 features of sakti –  antaranga – internal , tatastha– souls, bahiranga– external.
111. (S): We know the world in terms of certain forms of worldly understanding such as taste or color or smell. Māya however creates the forms of personal understanding, which are the ways in which consciousness perceives itself. While sensations define the modes in which we know the world
112. (T): Maya’s guna’s are 3 types - sattva, raja, tama - of gandha-smell, rasa– taste, rupa– form, sparsa-touch, sabda– sound
“This divine energy of Mine, consisting of the three modes of material nature, is difficult to overcome. But those who have surrendered unto Me can easily cross beyond it.” (BG 7.14)
According to the Veda, the paramanus (SB 3.11.1) are the ultimate, smallest particle and the components of the six kinds of quarks (elementary subatomic particles), the six types of anti-quarks and the leptons (the electron, positron and neutron). These are the smallest particles known in the western science. Each of these particles is a little smaller then the 10^-18cm. The size of the atom of the western materialistic science is 1 angstrom (10^-10cm).
The paramanu according to the Nyaya-Vaisesika is 0.79×10^-22 cm. But since they are souls in susupti they can expand or shrink further. The radiations = energies = modes = gunas of the paramanus all differ (SB 3.26.4 purport). One can call these gunas also the frequencies, waves or vibrations of the paramanu. This solves the wave-particle question of quantum mechanics; the particles are the paramanus and the ‘waves nature’ is the gunas of the paramanu They mix to give varieties of quarks (elementary subatomic particles) and leptons. If these assemble then we get for example, mesons an elementary particle having a mass between that of an electron and proton (these particles were originally named mesotrons by Heisenberg), protons, anti-protons, hadrons, baryons, neutrons. Atoms and molecules are composed of these particles. The further combination of these particles will give the elements or the objects of unlimited varieties of qualities of our world. The qualities, modes or guna’s means in relation to rupa, sparsa, sabda, rasa and gandha (form, touch, sound, taste and smell). The paramanus are the building blocks of the universe and the gunas are like the concrete that binds the paramanus. The subtle realm is also paramanus, atoms but their gunas make them invisible for us, and present for the (upa-) devatas.
- The types of qualities and the quality of intensities are controlled by the Paramatma; designed and designated by His officers at the creation of the universe, and manipulated during its maintenance. For example, as the light is dimmed or adjusted.
113. (S): The Vedic solution is to enter into a relation with God in which the living being constantly feels deprived of God and finds pleasure in meeting Him.
114. (T): There is no more separation in the spiritual world. So says Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti and Srila Jiva Gosvami commenting on Srila Rupa Gosvamis Ujjvala Nilamani.
Visvanatha: “The condition of union and separation: The condition of separation of the Vraja women from Krishna has been described according to the prakata pastimes of Krishna.
There is no separation at all of the Vraja women from Krishna, who eternally enjoys in the forests of Vrindavana with pastimes like the rasa dance.
From the Padma Purana, Patala-khanda, Mathura-mahatmya: There Krishna plays in the association of the cows, cowherds and gopis.
Jiva: Having described the separation of Krishna and his associates, the author now speaks in order to dispel the unhappiness of that situation. Separation is the special feature of the pastimes on earth. Verses 186 describe the special nature of the aprakata pastimes, where the pastimes of enjoyment are continuous. The word vrindaranye refers to the aprakata place.. The scriptural proof is given in verse 187. Krishna plays with the cows, cowherds and gopis. The present tense is used to the continuous nature of this act. As with the previous verse a distinction from the prakata pastimes on earth is established. Without that distinction, the events could not take place Eternally.” (Un p 596)
115. (S): The material creation arises out of God’s need to know His Self as He is not. Here, God’s actualization is affected as His self-denial or self-negation, also called God’s austerity: God wants to know what He is not and He engages in self-abnegation. The material creation from His self-image is like someone looking at a picture of oneself from a time that one does not identify with anymore (say when someone was very ugly or very poor). In such a case, one does not acknowledge the picture to be one’s true self, although in some sense it is that person’s picture. Similarly, when God engages in self-denial He creates the material world, which is everything that God is not. It is still God’s image, although the image is vitiated. God does not identify with this vitiated self-image as His true self, and so the image is about what He is not. This self-denial is God’s conception of not-self and constitutes the material form of māya.
116. What is the increase of pleasure He will get from this adventure.
It is rather His jiva particle who wants to experience what it is not; the enjoyer. You can rewrite this whole paragraph and theory with the jiva as subject, then it is truth.
The jivas self-denial or self-negation. Then the tapa, pain of going through 8.400.000 species.
117. (S): The material creation from His self-image is like someone looking at a picture of oneself from a time that one does not identify with anymore (say when someone was very ugly or very poor). In such a case, one does not acknowledge the picture to be one’s true self, although in some sense it is that person’s picture.
118. (T): Then why would He make that picture of Himself.
119. (S): Rather, in the spiritual creation, one voluntarily adopts a certain type of māya to feel inadequate in a particular manner. The sense in which one feels inadequate without God and misses Him is said to be the living being’s eternal form or svarūpa in relation to God.
120. Spirit can be independent of matter, Spirit doesn’t need matter. It is not that matter and spirit are always to be entwined. God is complete, with no need of mattter. The Upanishads teach:
“The completely Perfect is complete and perfect.”
There is, as stated in Bhakti rasamrta sindhu, a perfect, more perfect, most perfect. (NOD 2.1.221)
121. (S): In Hegel’s view, originally God existed as pure Being. However, when this Being attempted to think Himself (i.e. know Himself), He ended up with Nothingness, since pure Being is unthinkable. So by thinking Himself, God distanced Himself from His own essence. Hegel calls this God’s self-alienation and it can be compared to Vedic notion of māya .God’s attempt to think Himself is His attempt at self-knowledge.
122. (T): The vedic scenario is different.
It is in CC Adi-lila 7.106 The purport of Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura.
"Someone may argue, “Why is there a need to create the spiritual sparks?” The answer can be given in this way: Since the Absolute Personality of Godhead is omnipotent, He has both unlimited and limited potencies. This is the meaning of omnipotent. To be omnipotent, He must have not only unlimited potencies but limited potencies also. Thus to exhibit His omnipotency He displays both. The living entities are endowed with limited potency although they are part of the Lord. The Lord displays the spiritual world by His unlimited potencies, whereas by His limited potencies the material world is displayed. In the Bhagavad-gita (7.5) the Lord says:
“Besides these inferior energies, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is another, superior energy of Mine, which comprises all living entities who are exploiting the resources of this material, inferior nature.” The jiva-bhuta, the living entities, control this material world with their limited potencies. Generally, people are bewildered by the activities of scientists and technologists. Due to maya they think that there is no need of God and that they can do everything and anything, but actually they cannot. Since this cosmic manifestation is limited, their existence is also limited. Everything in this material world is limited, and for this reason there is creation, sustenance and dissolution. However, in the world of unlimited energy, the spiritual world, there is neither creation nor destruction.
If the Personality of Godhead did not possess both limited and unlimited energies, He could not be called omnipotent. Anor aniyan mahato mahiyan: “The Lord is smaller than the smallest and greater than the greatest.” He is smaller than the smallest in the form of the living entities and greater than the greatest in His form of Krishna. If there were no one to control, there would be no meaning to the conception of the supreme controller (isvara), just as there is no meaning to a king without his subjects. If all the subjects became king, there would be no distinction between the king and an ordinary citizen. Thus for the Lord to be the supreme controller there must be a creation to control. The basic principle for the existence of the living entities is called cid-vilasa, or spiritual pleasure. The omnipotent Lord displays His pleasure potency as the living entities. The Lord is described in the Vedanta-sutra (1.1.12) as ananda-mayo ’bhyasat. He is by nature the reservoir of all pleasures, and because He wants to enjoy pleasure, there must be energies to give Him pleasure or supply Him the impetus for pleasure. This is the perfect philosophical understanding of the Absolute Truth.”
123. (S): Hegel’s view, originally God existed as pure Being. However, when this Being attempted to think Himself (i.e. know Himself), He ended up with Nothingness, since pure Being is unthinkable.
124. (T): He is almighty– He can think of Himself.
125. (S): So by thinking Himself, God distanced Himself from His own essence.
126. (T): He is perfect and expanding in perfection, why He would be turning away from Himself. This is anthropomorphism; conditioned jivas will do that– in disgust “When the material life of a wandering soul has ceased, O Acyuta, he may attain the association of Your devotees. And when he associates with them, there awakens in him devotion unto You, who are the goal of the devotees and the Lord of all causes and their effects”. (SB 10.51.53)
My Lord, Your Lordship can easily be approached, but only by those who are materially exhausted. One who is on the path of [material] progress, trying to improve himself with respectable parentage, great opulence, high education and bodily beauty, cannot approach You with sincere feeling. (SB 1.8.26)
127. (S): Hegel calls this God’s self-alienation. God’s attempt to think Himself is His attempt at self-knowledge.
128. (T): When he sees Himself, He increases in ecstasy. In Rupa Gosvami's Lalita-madhava, it is said, "One day Krishna happened to see the shadow of His beautiful form reflected on the jeweled foreground. Upon seeing this bodily reflection, He expressed His feelings: 'How wonderful it is that I have never seen such a beautiful form! Although it is My own form, still, like Radharani, I am trying to embrace this form and enjoy celestial bliss.'”
129. (S): Māya facilitates God’s self-knowledge as His energy to feel inadequate and desire Himself.
130. (T): Some of God’s energy, some jivas, feel incomplete in the spiritual world, being apurna-sakti incomplete, being tiny in knowledge and want to be God and then become dog in the material world.
131. (S): God derives self-knowledge from the creation.
132. (T): In one of His infinite energies, the jiva gets self knowledge as the prisoner learns his lesson after a tour through the prison house.
133. (S): God as the supreme consciousness creates the universe out of matter. The individual consciousness looks at this universe and considers it his own reflection—the living being has the tendency to identify with the products in the creation as images of his personality.
134.  (T): ‘‘looking at the universe’’ is later, the soul falls down out of envy.
It gets a second choice at the margin of spirit and matter. Here it gets to see matter for the first time. Then in matter the first position the falling soul takes is the post of Brahma. Then one becomes Indra. Then one further falls down; one gets a tour through 8.400.000 species. (this is in “Brahmana and Vaisnava” by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta ch 2. P.86. Here is the full text:)
“At the border, the jiva is pure, without material designations. He is not serving the Supreme Lord (anymore). He is in santa-rasa and its tatastha-bava is constitutional. He has no taste for serving the Lord due to lack of knowledge (which he lost).
The propensity for serving the Supreme Lord is dormant. The propensity for material enjoyment is not there but indifference to the service of Hari and the seed of material enjoyment (after that) are present (because he had been serving and has become indifferent since later he writes: the jiva revives remembering the lotus feet of Sri Krsna, not Maha-Visnu…his lost Krisna consciousness is revived…forgets his ancient memory…re-established as the servant of the Lord).
The jiva cannot remain indifferent forever by subduing devotional and non-devotional propensities. He therefore contemplates unconstitutional activities from his marginal position. He is infected by impersonalism but due to neglecting the eternal service of the Lord and thereby developing the quality of aversion to the Lord, he cannot remain fixed in that position. In this way aversion to the Lord breaks his concentration of mind and establishes him as the master of this world of enjoyment.
Maya, the external energy of the Supreme Lord, then induces the marginal living entity to enjoy this world through her covering and throwing potencies and thus shows the living entity the reality of being averse to the Lord's service. At that time the living entity considers himself the king of enjoyers, and being situated in the mode passion he takes the position of Brahma and creates progeny…. Pride, illusion, greed, anger, and lust and induces the living entities to dance frantically in aversion to the Lord.
And on the platform of progress, if a living entity cultivates transcendental sound vibration and revives the process of remembering the lotus feet of Shri Krsna, he then achieves scientific spiritual knowledge. By this process, all anarthas are destroyed and he becomes situated in a supremely auspicious position.
Due to forgetfulness of Krsna there is perverted temporary and adverse movement of the senses. When they are properly employed in eternal subjects their disease of transience is destroyed and they give up the desire to embrace such transient objects.
Although the eternal living entity is constitutionally favorably inclined towards the Supreme Lord, due to his indifference towards the eternal service of the Lord he is eligible for being controlled by maya. He is eligible for achieving transcendental knowledge-this ancient memory he also often forgets.
By the mercy of a great liberated personality, who is pure, eternally engaged in service, self-realized, and the only shelter for the living entities, his lost Krsna consciousness is revived. Thereafter he desires freedom from Maya's covering and throwing potencies and searches after his own auspiciousness. As a result of this, he attains transcendental knowledge. The desire for achieving transcendental knowledge induces him to cultivate favorable service to Lord Vishnu. This cultivation begins with endeavoring for self-realization, reviving his lost propensity of service, and, ultimately, being re-established as the servant of the Lord. Then he is no longer considered a nondevotee, averse to the Lord.
135. (S): In the spiritual creation, māya creates in the living being a sense of separation from the ultimate pleasure object, God. A spiritual being lives under the idea “I am not God, and I miss God as the source of my completeness;” He or she also thinks, “I can be complete by being in touch with God;” This māya too creates the feelings of separation and meeting, but its evolution does not change the object from which one feels separated—God
136. (T): You cant use these words in a perfect world, “separation.. I miss”. That is only in the material world. If one wants to be separated from God, one must go to the material world.
Feelings of separation and meeting are not there. Read govinda–lilamrta, krsna-bhavanamrta.
137. (S): This existence is sometimes called vaikuntha or freedom from misery.
138. (T): What you describe is imperfection. That is called brahmananda, only and lonely floating in the spiritual light. Vaikuntha is with God, in His pastimes. Brahman is the outskirts or barren space outside of Vaikuntha.
  Cc madhya 19.149:  “Because a devotee of Lord Krishna is desireless, he is peaceful. Fruitive workers desire material enjoyment, jnanis desire liberation, and yogis desire material opulence; therefore they are all lusty and cannot be peaceful.”
139.  (S): A possibility, which is also a subtle state but different from other subtle states such as thinking. The stage of possibility lies intermediate between manifest and unmanifest states.
140. (T): The unmanifest, always changing to manifest, is also already always a possibility.
Pradhana means the first or chief.
The accumulated karma (sancita) of each ātmā persists even during the period of dissolution. Sancita karma is stored in the prakriti and lies there inactive. Prakriti is the unmanifest state or the causal state of matter.
Nature as pradhana exists in an unmanifest form in which objects have not yet been created because nature consists only of various possibilities.’
The action of Time, converts the possible into the manifest or the invisible into the visible.
Creation is revealed but not manifested in this stage of mahat-tattva. It is different then unmanifested, it is manifestation. Knowing the world as possibility allows visionaries to intuit things exist outside them and are inexplicably “perceived. These are called tri-kala-jnanis. They know before this stage– the past, present and future.
The existence of things as possibilities for creation is therefore a subtle level of reality described in the Vedas. A deterministic world has no room for possibility since everything is predetermined. But in a consciousness friendly world, possibility appears before reality.
Mahat tattva ‘always’ appears after pradhana.
141. (S): One mode of choice must now represent those things that have been chosen, and this is called rajas. Another mode of choice must represent all those things that have been rejected and is called tamas. The third mode must represent possibilities not yet selected or rejected, although these were possibilities for selection or rejection and this is called sattva.
142. (T): How the namesrajas, tamas, sattva used here represent the meaning of the names
143. (S): There are things never created or destroyed which always exist as possibility.
144. (T): There is no thing that is eternally condemned to nothingness or never becoming manifested. There  is not anything that is eternally nothing or always unmanifested.
145. (S): Time restricts this possibility to what will happen but not who will do it.
146. (T): According to ‘who’, time will adjusts the ‘whats’. The universe is not like a fair ground with all the seats of the turning wheels and merry-go-rounds fixed. Time will shape the seats.
147. (S): The actions themselves are manifested through multiple stages of efficient causes beginning with thoughts that are created from the chitta. Consciousness does not generate thoughts but it controls their continuation by approving or disapproving their existence.
148. (T): Your description, how the soul chooses, is theosophy influence and too idyllic.
This is only when the atma has spiritual knowledge, in the human forms of life. Otherwise the soul is automatically transported through the species by the results of karma. Yamaraja has judged him and the course through some of the 55 crores or 550 million of hells and 8.400.000 species is set.
Even in the human forms, mostly he only witnesses, helplessly, the course of karma.
“The spirit soul bewildered by the influence of false ego thinks himself the doer of activities that are in actuality carried out by the three modes of material nature.”
Two persons, one in Krishna consciousness and the other in material consciousness, working on the same level, may appear to be working on the same platform, but there is a wide gulf of difference in their respective positions. The person in material consciousness is convinced by false ego that he is the doer of everything. He does not know that the mechanism of the body is produced by material nature, which works under the supervision of the Supreme Lord. The materialistic person has no knowledge that ultimately he is under the control of Krishna. The person in false ego takes all credit for doing everything independently, and that is the symptom of his nescience. He does not know that this gross and subtle body is the creation of material nature, under the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and as such his bodily and mental activities should be engaged in the service of Krishna, in Krishna consciousness. The ignorant man forgets that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is known as Hrishikesa, or the master of the senses of the material body, for due to his long misuse of the senses in sense gratification, he is factually bewildered by the false ego, which makes him forget his eternal relationship with Krishna. (BG 3.27)
“Everyone is forced to act helplessly according to the qualities he has acquired from the modes of material nature; therefore no one can refrain from doing something, not even for a moment.” (BG 3.5)
“Again and again, when Brahma's day arrives, all living entities come into being, and with the arrival of Brahma's night they are helplessly annihilated. “
(BG 8.19)
“The conditioned soul therefore transmigrates into different species of life, higher and lower, because of his association with the modes of material nature. Unless he is relieved of material activities, he has to accept this position because of his faulty work.”
(Sb 3.27.3)
“When the living entity becomes exactly like a monkey jumping from one branch to another, he remains in the tree of household life without any profit but sex. Thus he is kicked by his wife just like the he-ass. Unable to gain release, he remains helplessly in that position. Sometimes he falls victim to an incurable disease, which is like falling into a mountain cave. He becomes afraid of death, which is like the elephant in the back of that cave, and he remains stranded, grasping at the twigs and branches of a creeper.”
The precarious condition of a householder's life is described herein. A householder's life is full of misery, and the only attraction is sex with the wife who kicks him during sexual intercourse, just as the she-ass does her mate. Due to continuous sex life, he falls victim to many incurable diseases. At that time, being afraid of death, which is like an elephant, he remains hanging from the twigs and branches of the tree, just like a monkey.
“O killer of enemies, Maharaja Rahugana, if the conditioned soul somehow or other gets out of his dangerous position, he again returns to his home to enjoy sex life, for that is the way of attachment. Thus, under the spell of the Lord's material energy, he continues to loiter in the forest of material existence. He does not discover his real interest even at the point of death.”
This is the way of material life. When one is captured by sexual attraction, he becomes implicated in so many ways and cannot understand the real aim of life. Therefore Srimad-Bhagavatam (7.5.31) says, na te viduh svartha-gatim hi vishnum: generally people do not understand the ultimate goal of life. As stated in the Vedas, om tad vishnoh paramam padam sada pasyanti surayah: those who are spiritually advanced simply look to the lotus feet of Vishnu. The conditioned soul, however, not being interested in reviving his relationship with Vishnu, becomes captivated by material activities and remains in everlasting bondage, being misled by so-called leaders. (SB 5.13.18-20)
The bodies and minds of materialistic nondevotees seem to display the symptoms of life, but this appearance is deceptive. Actually, the conditioned soul has little control over his own bodily existence. Against his will, he has to excrete waste, get sick from time to time, and eventually age and die. And in his mind he unwillingly suffers anger, hankering and lamentation. Lord Krishna describes this situation as yantrarudhani mayaya (Bg. 18.61), riding helplessly as a passenger in a mechanical vehicle. The soul undoubtedly is alive, and irrevocably so, but in his ignorance that inner life is covered and forgotten. In its place, the automation of the external mind and body carries out the dictates of the modes of nature, which force one to act in a way altogether irrelevant to the dormant needs of the soul. (SB 10.87.17)
Until he chooses to accept the mercy of the Personality of Godhead, the jiva soul is anusayi, helplessly bound up in the embrace of illusion. (SB 10.87.50)
“Thus the conditioned living entity is forced to experience repeated birth and death. Impelled by the reactions of his own activities, he helplessly wanders from one inauspicious situation to another, suffering from the moment of creation until the time of cosmic annihilation.” (SB 11.3.7)
A sober person, even when harassed by other living beings, should understand that his aggressors are acting helplessly under the control of God, and thus he should never be distracted from progress on his own path. This rule I have learned from the earth. (SB 11.7.37)
Elephants are captured in the jungle in the following way. A large hole is dug and then covered over with grass, leaves, mud and so on. Then a she-elephant is exhibited in front of the male elephant, who chases after her with lusty desire, falls into the hole and is captured. The lesson to be learned from the elephant is that the desire to relish the touch sensation is certainly the cause of ruining one's life. An intelligent person, noting the elephant's great propensity to sport with the she-elephant, will take this excellent example to heart. Therefore, somehow or other one should avoid being cheated by allurement to the sensuous form of woman. One should not allow one's mind to be lost in lusty dreams of sex pleasure. There are various types of sense gratification to be enjoyed between men and women, including speaking, contemplating, touching, sexual intercourse, etc., and all of these constitute the network of illusion by which one is helplessly bound like an animal. Somehow or other one should remain aloof from sense gratification in the form of sex pleasure; otherwise, there is no possibility of understanding the spiritual world. (SB 11.8.13)
The mind is always concocting objects for happiness. I am always thinking, "This will make me happy," or "That will make me happy. Happiness is here. Happiness is there." In this way the mind is taking us anywhere and everywhere. It is as though we are riding on a chariot behind an unbridled horse. We have no power over where we are going but can only sit in horror and watch helplessly. As soon as the mind is engaged in the Krishna consciousness process—specifically by chanting Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna, Hare Hare/ Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare—then the wild horses of the mind will gradually come under our control. (On the Way to Krishna ch 1. Throughway to Happiness)
149. (S): A yogi controls the mind by selecting and rejecting thoughts that are being automatically created by chitta and not by generating other thoughts.
150. (T): The spiritual body also has mind, intelligence and ego. These have their thinking, feeling and willing according to the nitya-svarupa, one’s eternal form.
Then there is mattah smrtir jnanam apohanam from the ista-deva– one’s worshipable God form, in and outside the soul.
Then there is the nama-rupa, the name form or person or name of the istadeva one focuses on in dhyana– meditation or japa– the recitation of the name.
These generate content for the consciousness, apart from the generations of the material elements.

150a. (T): Conclusion. God is never imperfect, and struggling with us for a better material world. He has got so many energies, subtle energies that He appears to be doing nothing. Krishna is in Vrindavana. He is playing as cowherds boy, or He is dancing with the cowherds girls, or He is going to the pasturing ground with the cows as if He has nothing as work to do. He is free. Why He is free? Because He has got so many energies to act that He hasn't got to see personally whether things are being done or not done. God, Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is in the spiritual world, far away from the prison-house of the material world. Even His expansions for creating, maintaining and destroying the material world are turiya – transcendental - to matter. If you become Krishna conscious, then she is Radharani. And if you are not Krishna conscious, she is Durga.